Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Up Date On My Appeals

Rate this question


RUREADY

Question

After contacting Bob about my appeals it has been with the judge for 30 days

so at least its not denied yet. After researching on the judge its looks like he

is judge hacker most his decision is a remand or a denial but most didn't have

no evidence nor medical opinions. Looks like he do read the whole c-file an consider

the evidence. So I wait some more but I got what I ask and I ant mad.

Everybody have a Great Thanksgiving!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

RU: Maybe the end is in sight. This is the 1st time I've seen your post. I had a "Great DRO Hearing" 6/26/14, all issues from (2) NOD's 2010 & 2012 awarded. Opted for "Informal" instead of "Formal recorded and transcribed" format. DRO tpld me we could go back on record with formal format at any time. So needless to say, because it worked out exceptionally for me, I'm a strong advocate for the DRO Hearing process. All major $ issues to include 2012 IU NOD awarded. I had been 90% SC since late 2010. My 6/27 DRO Hearing was officially for my 2010 NOD, so that took 31/2 yrs. add to that the 11 months I procrastinated on filing the NOD, I was 4+ yrs since the original claims denial. My bad!

Hope you can help me, help a few other Nam Vets I try to assist. Any and all info you might be able to share regarding your claims journey would be of great assistance. I never made it to the BVA level and from my research it appears that the majority of 2014 & 2013 BVA decisions have been waiting 4+ years. Remands seem to be the rule rather than the exception. So, any info you could offer based on your own experience would be appreciated.

Happy Thanksgiving

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

RU: Maybe the end is in sight. This is the 1st time I've seen your post. I had a "Great DRO Hearing" 6/26/14, all issues from (2) NOD's 2010 & 2012 awarded. Opted for "Informal" instead of "Formal recorded and transcribed" format. DRO tpld me we could go back on record with formal format at any time. So needless to say, because it worked out exceptionally for me, I'm a strong advocate for the DRO Hearing process. All major $ issues to include 2012 IU NOD awarded. I had been 90% SC since late 2010. My 6/27 DRO Hearing was officially for my 2010 NOD, so that took 31/2 yrs. add to that the 11 months I procrastinated on filing the NOD, I was 4+ yrs since the original claims denial. My bad!

Hope you can help me, help a few other Nam Vets I try to assist. Any and all info you might be able to share regarding your claims journey would be of great assistance. I never made it to the BVA level and from my research it appears that the majority of 2014 & 2013 BVA decisions have been waiting 4+ years. Remands seem to be the rule rather than the exception. So, any info you could offer based on your own experience would be appreciated.

Happy Thanksgiving

Semper Fi

Gastone

Gastone just glad you had success at the DRO level me I ask for a dro review only

once and it didn't go well for me. The appeals that I have now is about four years since

form 9 that the RO held on their desk for four years. I have one contention with this

appeals an early effective date for TDIU about 6 years of back pay or a quarter million

dollars in cash. I file my own claims, I do my own research about my filling , and I always

leave a paper trail of treatment records and doctor opinions behind for them to read or destroy

So my appeals has been rough road but I will do what ever it takes to win I will use every weapon

we have to use CONGRESSMAN, PRESIDENT,BOB,LAWYERS,DOCTORS doesn't matter who

like it or who gets mad. I never give up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

RU: Thanks for the quick get back. Did you have a DRO Hearing (Formal or Informal) with your initial NOD? Another Nam Vet I meet with filed his 11th Hour NOD requesting a DRO Hearing thru his DAV Rep after we discussed his BVA/DRO Hearing options and the need for New & Material evidence in regards to the DRO Hearing. He never verified what the DAV filed on his behalf. Turned out, he received a Continued Denial and Sup Stmt of Case, NO personal hearing. Told me he never sent in his New & Material Evidence, was planning on presenting it at the Official DRO Hearing. Big mistakes X (2), didn't verify what DRO request was made by his Rep and sat on his N&M evidence. The time wasted waiting for a DRO Review without N&M Evidence guaranteed a continued Denial.

You mentioned that your VARO held the Form 9 on their desk for (4) yrs. During this period, did you receive any Sup Stmt Of Case

issued after a VARO review of your Denial based on N&M Evidence being submitted? My limited understanding is the BVA has to Certify your appeal as ready for the BVA Hearing before it can be assigned a Docket Number. I take that to mean any and all New & Material evidence must be reviewed by your VARO and SSOC issued before Certification for BVA can be made. At what point did you receive the VA 90 day Evidence cut off letter?

Thanks for taking the time to help me out.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

RU: Thanks for the quick get back. Did you have a DRO Hearing (Formal or Informal) with your initial NOD? Another Nam Vet I meet with filed his 11th Hour NOD requesting a DRO Hearing thru his DAV Rep after we discussed his BVA/DRO Hearing options and the need for New & Material evidence in regards to the DRO Hearing. He never verified what the DAV filed on his behalf. Turned out, he received a Continued Denial and Sup Stmt of Case, NO personal hearing. Told me he never sent in his New & Material Evidence, was planning on presenting it at the Official DRO Hearing. Big mistakes X (2), didn't verify what DRO request was made by his Rep and sat on his N&M evidence. The time wasted waiting for a DRO Review without N&M Evidence guaranteed a continued Denial.

You mentioned that your VARO held the Form 9 on their desk for (4) yrs. During this period, did you receive any Sup Stmt Of Case

issued after a VARO review of your Denial based on N&M Evidence being submitted? My limited understanding is the BVA has to Certify your appeal as ready for the BVA Hearing before it can be assigned a Docket Number. I take that to mean any and all New & Material evidence must be reviewed by your VARO and SSOC issued before Certification for BVA can be made. At what point did you receive the VA 90 day Evidence cut off letter?

Thanks for taking the time to help me out.

Semper Fi

Gastone

I summited an IMO after I got the SOC after my dro hearing "off record" {maybe one of my first mistakes}

then my attorney and I ask or sign a waiver for the new evidence to go to BVA an let the judge decide the case and not the

AOJ or regional office and that's where the waiting gets long They will send you something that is the same denial in the

SOC even after you ask for the new evidence to be viewed by BVA they will hold it and then send you a SSOC

maybe 2-4 years for this. The form9 once file and receive should get you a docket # and then you wait for it to

get certified to go to BVA. If you send anything in while waiting to go to BVA and don't sign that waiver most likely the

judge wont see it and if the RO has not seen it maybe a remand because the RO has to make a decision on it first.

I made this mistake my self on my first claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

RU: Thanks for the info. Did you have an attorney at your DRO Hearing? What made you decide on the "Informal" format as opposed to the Recorded and Transcribed Hearing? Did you ever receive the VA 90 day evidence cut off letter? If so , when? Are you currently waiting for a Traveling Board, a Video Hearing or a DC Hearing?

A friend missed getting N&M Evidence in for his DRO Review and surprise surprise, DRO continued his Denial. It's been just about a year since he sent his Form 9 in and he has not had his Appeal Certified and has not received a BVA Docket number. He has received (2) supplemental SOC's about 7 months ago. Turned out after discussing what I thought was an error on his part relying on the VSO Rep to file for the Hearing and him setting on his N&M Evidence waiting for the Hearing that evidently was never requested, he sent it in. The evidence wasn't quite as strong as he thought, VARO Review of his Denial by SR Rater or a DRO continued his Denial. Sometimes we Vets can be our own worst enemies when it comes to VA Comp Claims. He's now waiting for a BVA Video Hearing that I really think will end up shooting him down or at the very best, Remanding his claim.

Thanks again and keep us posted

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

RU: Thanks for the info. Did you have an attorney at your DRO Hearing? What made you decide on the "Informal" format as opposed to the Recorded and Transcribed Hearing? Did you ever receive the VA 90 day evidence cut off letter? If so , when? Are you currently waiting for a Traveling Board, a Video Hearing or a DC Hearing?

I did not have an attorney at the dro but had a VSO who was also with the dro on the decision

that was offer, they already talk about what they was to offer me before the hearing was held then

I was told by dro he would grant my claim but when I got the decision it was the same bull shit that

they offered one year back pay. That why most dro will not go against their working buddies that

they train that rated your claim unless they miss something of records. jmho

90 day cut off I am not sure about"". That why I got an attorney for a quarter million it is worth

it to me to have my best chance of winning and not losing it at my mistake.

No hearing was ask for at BVA just the judge look over the evidence and make his decision

that's all I want. Hell even if I lose the claim I still can live

Edited by RUREADY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use