Jump to content
Using an Ad Blocker? Consider adding HadIt.com as an exception. Hadit.com is funded through advertising, ad free memberships, contributions and out of pocket. ×
  • 0

Absence Of Evidence Is Not Evidence Of Absence!

This thread is over 365 days old and has been closed.

Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.

For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.

If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered. 


Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating. 


This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.




  • Moderator

The VA pulls this ploy rather frequently. They deny you based on "evidence of absence". (The record is negative for any Treatment by the Veteran for xxx disease) They count that as "proof" you dont have the disease, when it probably means the VA lost your records, or put them in another Veterans file, or never bothered to order them all in the first place.

This is error.

Moreover, in Jandreau v. Nicholson, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit noted
that identifying a form of cancer was an example of when a lay person—in this case, the
Board—would not be competent to identify a condition. 492 F.3d 1372, 1377 fn 4 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
Therefore, the only competent opinion as to the onset of the appellant's prostate cancer is Dr.
Tinetti's August 31, 2009, letter, which dates the onset of the appellant's prostate cancer in 1995-96.
Cf. Buczynski v. Shinseki, 24 Vet.App. 221, 224 (2011) ("[T]he Board may not consider the absence
of evidence as substantive negative evidence.) Accordingly, the Board's requirement of a "definitive
diagnosis" and its determination that the presence of cancer earlier than 1998 was not indicated is
simply untenable. See DeLisio v. Shinseki, 25 Vet.App. 45, 56 (2011) ("entitlement to benefits for
a disability or disease does not arise with a medical diagnosis of the condition, but with the
manifestation of the condition . . .").
3Based on the foregoing, the Court holds that the Board clearly erred when it determined that
the preponderance of the evidence was not at least in equipoise as to an onset of the appellant's
prostate cancer earlier than 1998. See Hood v. Shinseki, 23 Vet.App. 295, 299 (2009) ("The Court
reviews factual findings under the 'clearly erroneous' standard such that it will not disturb a Board
finding unless, based on the record as a whole, the Court is convinced that the finding is incorrect.");
Mariano v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 305, 313 (2003) (applying the "clearly erroneous" standard to
assess the Board's application of the "equipoise standard" under 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b)); see also
38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) ("When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence
regarding any issue material to the determination of a matter, the Secretary shall give the benefit of
the doubt to the claimant."). Thus, the Court will reverse and remand the Board's decision for it to
assign an effective date of October 10, 2005. See Gutierrez v. Principi, 19 Vet.App. 1, 10 (2004)
(holding that reversal is the appropriate remedy when the Board's decision is clearly erroneous
because the "only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision").
Source: Walker vs McDonald
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I saved my military records after I got out, that is the only thing that saved me in my claim. My service records were no where to be found according to DOD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

If VA can't find Records don't they have to go on ''presumption? as long as he as A DD214 & Honorable Discharge any doubt goes to the veteran?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

That's what you might think, and what the laws say, particularly when a "combat" veteran's claims are made.

The VA has traditionally thought and acted otherwise. Too many denied claims really don't comply with the law.

The VA has taken the attitude that it's necessary to fight many claims in court, even when it's obvious that they were wrong.

Often, the last resort defense has been to hide behind various laws limiting the government's liability.

Sometimes veterans win in court, sometimes they don't. Many of the wins cannot be used as a precedent, and are basically ignored by the VA, forcing

yet another and another similar court case for different veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA's favorite statement is that "Veteran's Records are silent regarding such and such". This is death toll ringing for your claim usually. I was examined by a VA dentist for TMJ. The doctor told me that there was nothing he could do about it. Much later when I looked at my SMC's the dentist had just written in " exam" and no DX, so the VA said my records were silent on TMJ and I lost. I got serious after that and got IME's for SC mental condition since VA drove me nuts .


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.


  • Advertisemnt

  • question-001.jpegLooking for Answers? Here are tips for finding the answers you seek.


    All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. To post, you must register. Registration is free. You can register for a free account here.


    You can read the forums without registering.


    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question.
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.


    Leading to:


    Post straightforward questions and then post background information.


    • A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    • I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
        • I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?


    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.




    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed.
    • This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines