Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dav Purpose

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

The DAV purpose is, ..."To cooperate with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs"...

Source: http://www.davmembersportal.org/mo/Missouri%20DAV%20Constitution%20Bylaws/National_Constitution_Bylaws_2010.pdf

Article ll "Purpose".

(Other Veterans Service Organizations have similar bylaws).

Keep this in Perspective:

If your neighbor was suing you, would you go to his lawyer for advice on how to settle it? This is exactly what is happening here! The VA pretends to be "non adversarial" and most of us who have been around a while know that is simply not true.

So, we give a POA to a VSO who promised to cooperate with our adversary!!! Its written right into the bylaws that your VSO represents VA not YOU. Its a conflict of interest, big time. So its no wonder our VSO's make ups stuff like

"you cant get tinnitus and hearing aids" from VA.

Source:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm going to chime in here! There are good and bad in every job field. I've worked in private sector and Government jobs and there were hard workers in both but there were also people just taking up space. My husband is a former VSO for the State of Kentucky and he worked his buns off. He carried cards with him everywhere he went and if he ran into a Veteran or family member of one he gave them his card and told them to give him a call. When he could no longer walk he rode his scooter around. Now the office he had is empty and has been pretty much since July 2010. My suggestion is if you have a complaint about the service you are getting from the VSO then go up the chain of command with the specific complaint but also remember they can't change when decisions are made or what the decisions are. They are there to serve you in processing your claims and answer your questions. If all of them were gone like my husband is who is going to be there to help? There will just be a bunch more empty offices.

By the way, I took over his claim because his VSO wasn't doing anything. I also got my own Social Security Disability all the way up to appearing before a Hearing Officer and fought my way to get disability from the State of Kentucky Retirement Systems. I'm not bragging, just saying that there is a lot of excellent information here and if your VSO isn't doing something and you read about it hear call them up and suggest they do it. Research your disabilities and read all the ways they affect you, including meds side-affects. I included a list of some of my husbands meds and there side-affects with the BVA appeal and it was referenced in the decision "it is clear the side-effects of the medication he is on will prevent him from doing even sedentary employment."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Kudos to your husband, Dinnard, for his fine efforts in assisting veterans.

I don't want to discourage VSOs like him who serve in excellence.

It's good to be realistic about our situations. You've all probably been in jobs where there is more work than can be done, misguided leaders who take workers the wrong way, CYA policies that thwart The Process, etc.

When you're in that type of environment for awhile it's normal to become jaded and perform with less than excellence.

So- if your claim is with a VSO, you don't want to assume that they are working on it whole-heartedly to the degree it should be. You've got time on your hands so research your claim and determine if you're presenting the best case or if more needs to be submitted.

Cancel the POA and take the reins yourself if you feel able and that it's necessary.

I was scraping by while awaiting SSDI so I kept working on my claim. I came across the On The Record decision possibility, pursued it and won - saving months or more in poverty. http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/on-the-record.html

Acknowledge that VSOs and others are over-worked and possibly burnt out so no one will devote as much time and effort to your claim as you will.

Good luck! :smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I appreciate your perspective Dinnard, and found it interesting that you fired your VSO and took over your claim, too.

Im not sure people are aware that their VSO is sworn to "cooperate with the Veteran's opponent (the VA)" The way they get away with this conflict of interest is they say they are non adversarial. Does anyone here think VA is non adversarial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • In Memoriam

This isn't about good or bad workers. This is about the purpose and intent of the VSO's. VSO's are there to serve the VA and not the Veteran.

Sure there are good and bad workers that serve the VA.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I had VSO at one of my hearings and when the hearing started up the DRO look at me said Introduced himself & ask ''HOW MAY I HELP YOU TODAY''

and then he looked at the VSO VSO said nothing then the DRO look over at me...it was my first time at a DRO hearing...All I knew to do was speak up I had presented all my evidence and thank the DRO for giving me the time to state my case in person and I told him my story...That VSO was useless but maybe later he may have helped expidite my claim? IDK?

I think sometimes a veteran can get a bad VSO & maybe sometimes he can get a good one that knows the system and veteran friendly.... just my opinion.

Maybe the veterans should train the VSO...I mean if we have to work our claim and gather all the evidence/time limits and use proper VA Language we may as well get our self's educated in VA Law.

Time to get shed of a VSO if he /she don't seem to be helping with your claim or have your interest at heart like not returning calls or messing up things he/she knows nothing about.

If the VSO are there to serve the VA&not the Veteran Well without the veterans there would not be a VA!

The best VSO&Advice a veteran can have in my opinion are some of these fine folks right here on hadit they know who they are!

Merry Christmas Everyone!!!

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use