Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Kinda Confused About Results....

Rate this question


rcscrow15

Question

Hello everyone, first time posting here but not my first time on this site......I have used all that I have learned here and applied it with much success.....The knowledge here is just the best....Thank you all for your insight and guidance......I had an general medical c & p exam in November of this year. I did not find out what it was until I got there and it was for an SVT. The following is what I need your expert insight on: Please see below:

What does the orange area mean, and what impact will it have towards my current IU claim?

Date of interview-based METs test: 11/7/14
Symptoms during activity:
The METs level checked below reflects the
lowest activity level at
which the Veteran reports any of the
following symptoms (check all
symptoms that the Veteran reports at the
indicated METs level of
activity):
[X] Fatigue
Results:
METs level on most recent interview-based
METs test:
[X] (>7-10 METs) This METs level has been
found to be consistent
with activities such as climbing
stairs quickly,
moderate bicycling, sawing wood,
jogging (6 mph)
c. If the Veteran has had both an exercise stress
test and an interview-based
METs test, indicate which results most accurately
reflect the Veteran's
current cardiac functional level:
[ ] Exercise stress test [X] Interview-based
METs test [ ] N/A
d. Is the METs level limitation due solely to the
heart condition(s)?
[ ] Yes [X] No
If no, estimate the percentage of the METs
level limitation that is
due solely to the heart condition(s):
[X] 0% [ ] 10% [ ] 20% [ ] 30% [ ] 40%
[ ] 50% [ ] 60% [ ] 70% [ ] 80% [ ] 90%
e. In addition to the heart condition(s), does the
Veteran have other
non-cardiac medical conditions (such as
musculoskeletal or pulmonary
conditions) limiting the METs level?
[X] Yes [ ] No
Other medical condition #1: lack of energy due
to PTSD
Effect on METs level: 100%
15. Functional impact
---------------------
Does the Veteran's heart condition(s) impact his or
her ability to work?
[X] Yes [ ] No
16. Remarks, if any
-------------------
Although veteran has a normal EKG currently, a
diagnosis of SVT is
given based on history.Claimant is waiting to
see a cardiologist for
further evaluation.
Thanks

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am confused too...

Are you service connected for PTSD? If so at what percent?

Did you claim fatigue as secondary to the PTSD?

"Other medical condition #1: lack of energy due

to PTSD

Effect on METs level: 100%

15. Functional impact

---------------------

Does the Veteran's heart condition(s) impact his or

her ability to work?

[X] Yes [ ] No"

This could possibly set the stage for TDIU consideration ,if you are not working, based on how the examiner answered, but still

......it is confusing.

Do the meds you take for the PTSD cause the fatigue?

Are you service connected for SVT yet?

http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/Files2/0711771.txt

This above BVA decision has the rating criteria for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).

I think the cardio exam will tell you more.

I am confused about the way the claim was filed.

Fatigue on it's own is only a symptom.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

With SVT diagnosed, I'd suggest considering getting an outside VA interventional cardiologist's opinion.

At 45, it's possible that blockages might be coming and going, or even moving around.

It's also worth noting that 45 is in an age range that is at risk for an unexpected heart attack, with little or no

proceeding or obvious symptoms. Such attacks result in a higher death rate than those that occur later in life.

If the veteran with such a problem happens to be female. the risks are higher, and not as well understood as in a male.

Fatigue, intermittent high blood pressure, and high pulse rates can be a symptom of many pending or existing heart problems.

Long term stress, caused by PTSD, by itself, can lead to heart problems.

I've said this as someone that survived "silent" heart attacks, and eventual open heart surgery at about the same age.

My brother also a Navy veteran, was not so lucky, and died due to a massive heart attack and failed open heart surgery.

He was in his early 40's.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I had an SVT episode (strong, I thought it was a heart attack) back in September 27, 2013.......That day took everything out of me.....I never returned to work.......ptsd took over in the worse way ever...........I have not put in for fatigue as secondary to PTSD yet.....

The meds I take do make me very fatigued and i think are also related to my OSA........I am SC for PTSD 70%....This C & P was ordered because of TDIU submitted.....it was the second C & P ordered (first mental then general medicine) (found out it was for SVT on that day)....

.....I am not service connected to SVT Yet......

Thanks for the decision link......

Thanks Berta and Chuck

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use