Jump to content
Using an Ad Blocker? Consider adding HadIt.com as an exception. Hadit.com is funded through advertising, ad free memberships, contributions and out of pocket. ×
  • 0

Nod Dilema - It's In, But Found 3 Unadjudicated Claims Fm 2012 Claim (Focused On What Was Addressed, Failed To See What Wasn't)

This thread is over 365 days old and has been closed.

Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.

For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.

If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered. 


Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating. 


This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.




I was looking at my(VA form 21-438) fm early 2012 to quote some language, and found three unadjudicated claims for SC / Comp, including lower left radiculopathy related to SC IVDS/DDD, and Cervical Spine Condition with bilateral upper radiculopathy.

I cannot believe I didn't catch that - I was so focused on what they did address I forgot to look at what they didn't (and they didn't - in any way shape or form - not as deferred, just no mention).

The NOD is in, and doesn't include any info about these unadjudicated issues, but as I understand it they will remain open until adjudicated, so there is no ticking clock. The NOD as it is written seems to going FAST (went from stamped (Nov 21, 2014) to Under Review (like, three weeks later), then Gathering Evidence (in about a week)).

So I'm inclined not to complicate things with unadjudicated stuff. Think that's the right call?

Edited by GlassRose1500
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Any claim not mentioned specifically in a letter of explanation of a decision for benefits is deemed denied if not delineated as being deferred or requiring further investigation. If they don't mention it, it's considered moot. Moreover, if you do not protest by filing an objection or query, it is really moot and you are presumed to not have any druthers on the subject anymore.

The repair order for that is to file an amended NOD 21-0958 specifically asking for appellate review of the prior enumerated (and still not adjudicated) items you filed for. This protects your right to appeal them to the BVA and the CAVC. VA does this a lot thinking you have the IQ of a pet rock and a short memory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Apparently I do have the IQ of a pet rock because I missed these unadjudicated issues completely... the NOD I filed was timely. An amendment would not be, unless you are saying the form you referenced would permit the amendment so long as the initial nod was timely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'll get right on researching that. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

I want to ensure DRO review w/face to fave stays on track. It may be I chose the path of new and material evidence at some future point w loss of 2012 date.

Tks. My fellow Night Owl...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hell, any Vet who's interested in guns is okay with me even if they're a ground pounder. What I would do is submit it as:

"Addendum to NOD filed xx/xx/xxxx concerning disagreement with unadjudicated items filed for on the same date - to wit- Bozos # 1, 2 & 3 which have not been adjudicated to date. Appellant has waited patiently for claims to be adjudicated and is worried VA may have overlooked these. In the interests of judicial economy, Veteran asks that these outstanding claims be adjudicated forthwith so as to be incorporated into any future appeal in a timely manner and to avoid piecemeal adjudication and preserve scarce judicial resources."

Beat them up with their own words. This puts them on notice that you weren't born last night. It also points out they cannot do the "You didn't bitch so its moot." These claims have no true suspense dates such as the year following a denial because they are still viable legally. Being unadjudicated, they can only expire if the whole claim is closed out. Otherwise they fester like a splinter in your finger legally. If you have any added material evidence (new), you can also send that in regarding the AWOL claims. This reinforces the claim by implying you are still waiting on an initial determination and if they are going to throw a hissy fit, it's best to get all the contentions on the table early on.

Edited by asknod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This claim is already ripe for piecemeal adjudication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Go the IRIS route and be politely inquisitive. Ask them what the progress is since they failed to mention the items. Ask for a best guess on completion and see what they say.

One thing I strongly advise my folks to do is save every IRIS commo. I had a wad of about 25 of them I submitted with my Writ yesterday. After asking them for over a year when they planned on adjudicating two claims they've been sitting on since Oct. 2012, they continued to say "Gee, we're sorry it's taking so long but claims in Seattle are running about 15 months so be patient." On the last one in November I got more blunt and asked how 15 months comports with them having it 23 months. The answer was priceless: " Claims in Seattle are running about 15 months so don't fret..." That's going to look pretty foolish in about a month. The best one was "We're sorry we can't adjudicate your ILP claim but the raters have your c-file and we don't have access to it." A month later and another IRIS query came back with "Sorry, the c-file is in DC on an appeal you've filed. When it gets back here, we'll do the SOC.

IRIS is a wonderful tool because each commo has an inquiry number. It's embedded in their computer and cannot go away. When you get to appeal or a Writ, the avalanche of evidence cannot be rebutted. Always use their machine against them. Let them do the work of undermining their own case against you. Remember, these guys can't find their rear end with a methane detector in a closet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.


  • Advertisemnt

  • question-001.jpegLooking for Answers? Here are tips for finding the answers you seek.


    All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. To post, you must register. Registration is free. You can register for a free account here.


    You can read the forums without registering.


    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question.
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.


    Leading to:


    Post straightforward questions and then post background information.


    • A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    • I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
        • I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?


    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.




    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed.
    • This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines