Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Help The Cmp Examiner Denied My Claim Based On A Different Discharge

Rate this question


Burnsm00

Question

Hello...I recently did a cmp and pft test. Then two later i got a denial letter in the mail. I looked at the evidence on her decision and and put done 6204.2 uncategorized/erroneous enlistment as evidence to deny me. When my discharge was 6203.2 convience of the government. What do I do...do i have to wait five years because a cmp examiner made a big mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

was your discharge honorable? just curious.

i don't know much about CUE so i don't know if this falls into the category or not. or if you would have to file a notice of disagreement. but the nature of your discharge concerns me. i received a general under honorable condition discharge because mine was medically related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

We need more info.

I only found one case tat the BVA regarding this type of discharge:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/files3/1123124.txt

The veteran had a GI Bill issue and not a service connected claim.

His case was on remand.

The case states:

"6203.2, concerns a "Physical Condition Not a Disability." It states that (a) Whenever a Marine's performance deteriorates or has an adverse effect on others in the unit, commanding officers and subordinate leaders will try to determine the cause. When the command suspects a physical condition interferes with the Marine's effective performance of duty, the Marine should be referred to the appropriate medical authority. If examination by a medical officer confirms that the Marine is suffering from a physical condition apparently beyond the individual's control and indicates that the condition is not a disability, initiate separation proceedings per paragraph 6303 or 6304 as appropriate. Such conditions may include the following:

[Continued on Next Page]

(1) Obesity. Separation under this basis requires certification by a medical officer or medical board report that the Marine's overweight condition is due to pathological factors, not of a temporary nature, and apparently beyond the Marine's control. See MCO 6100.10B.

(2) Bed-wetting (enuresis).

(3) Sleepwalking.

(4) Chronic air sickness.

(5) Chronic motion sickness.

(6) Pseudofolliculitis Barbae. Refer to MCO 6310.1B, Pseudofolliculitis Barbae, for details or treatment required before initiation of separation action.

(7) Allergy. This includes, but is not limited to, allergy to clothing, boots, bedding, and bee stings, or illness such as asthma and hay fever.

(8) Disqualifying Height. Separation on this basis is appropriate when, after a proper enlistment, a Marine cannot be assigned duties appropriate to grade and MOS due to increased height. Before separation, the commander should investigate reassignment options for the Marine.

(9) Any additional physical condition which interferes with duty, as determined by the commanding officer and medical officer, that is not considered a physical disability."

Apparently the veteran was eligile for partial GI Bill and I found no case regarding a service connected disability with this type of discharge.

Except the BVA notes:

"he Veteran appears to have been granted service connection for asthma by the RO. The Veteran submitted a copy of the award letter which indicated he had "asthma, exercise induced" and a 10 percent disability rating from April 25, 2007, which is his discharge date. It appears there is a July 2008 rating decision granting service connection for asthma; however, such a document is not associated in the claims file.

The RO, in the September 2009 Statement of the Case, indicated "that DoD confirmed that the Veteran was not released due to a service-connected disability. Claimant was released due to a condition with his asthma." However, no such record from the Department of Defense (DoD) is in the claims file."

You should have received from the VA, after filing the claim, a VCAA letter. Did the VA ask for any additional info regarding your discharge and did you send it to them?

Did they request any confirmation from DOD as to the type of discharge you got?

As this case reveals, it is possible to get service connection with this type of discharge....but the BVA found there was much info lacking in the case.

Was your discharge Honorable?

And what are you claiming?

Can you scan and attach here the actual denial as to the VA's reason and Basis and also the Evidence list they used? (cover C file, name, address, prior to scanning.)

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP), Pulmonary Function Test (PFT)
It would seem to me that all you would have to do is present your DD-214 to your regional office showing that your discharge was 6203.2 vice 6204.2. Or, go back to the "cmp examiner" and have her correct the mistake and resubmit.
Edited by toddt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

And here I thought the CMP was a misspelling of the C&P exam?? Rereading his post I still think he meant C&P because later he states "CMP examiner."

As to the discharge, I believe they give a "for the convenience of the Gov't" discharge, in an effort to protect the VA/Gov't from potential compensation claims, but I'm not positive.

Personally, I'd file a CUE claim, requesting that the VA CUE themselves, based on the erroneous code used.

jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I misunderstood this too.

PR said "Personally, I'd file a CUE claim, requesting that the VA CUE themselves, based on the erroneous code used."

That might be a good idea but then again this veteran stated:

"When my discharge was 6203.2 convience of the government. What do I do...do i have to wait five years because a cmp examiner made a big mistake."

Burnsm00, did you file a claim for anything on the 6203.2 list above that is Not considered a disability?

We need more info.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use