Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Secondary Issues

Rate this question


kate7772

Question

Okay, I am having a brain fart moment. What is it called when you are awarded for a condition that is caused from another condition? Something like ED as a result of PTSD. And how is the rate figured on this?

Thanks

Kate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Kate: Secondary to SC or condition that was DX'd prior to SC condition and has been aggravated by the SC condition. The ED is a SMC-K award, $100 and change. Check the SMC's for the exact amount.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Kate: Secondary to SC or condition that was DX'd prior to SC condition and has been aggravated by the SC condition. The ED is a SMC-K award, $100 and change. Check the SMC's for the exact amount.

Semper Fi

Gastone

What about something like hypertension due to something else service connected?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

It could work but you need medical opinion to say that the primary condition caused the secondary condition in some way. Some are easy like the many secondary conditions related to diabetes. Some are harder where their is less agreement among medical opinion on secondary conditions. For instance, if you have PTSD and claim your sleep apnea is secondary to the PTSD. The best secondary opinion I ever got was from the VA itself. They used to be able to have their doctors do this for you. They had a computer application or document that delivered the best secondary nexus you could wish for, but it was too good. The VA nixed that idea in a hurry.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It could work but you need medical opinion to say that the primary condition caused the secondary condition in some way. Some are easy like the many secondary conditions related to diabetes. Some are harder where their is less agreement among medical opinion on secondary conditions. For instance, if you have PTSD and claim your sleep apnea is secondary to the PTSD. The best secondary opinion I ever got was from the VA itself. They used to be able to have their doctors do this for you. They had a computer application or document that delivered the best secondary nexus you could wish for, but it was too good. The VA nixed that idea in a hurry.John

But if an issue is granted as secondary, how then do they rate it? Is it rated the same as if were the primary issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It is rating just like a primary condition using the rating tables in 38 USC part 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Kate: Hypertension is a tough nut to crack as a Secondary Issue, especially if DX'd prior to the SC your trying to link it to. If it develops post SC condition, much better chance. It comes down to the old DBQ and is it "More likely or 50% as likely as not caused or aggravated by your SC condition." How do you stack up against the usual causative conditions leading to HBP?

Good luck, it appears to me that the large majority of Dr's believe Hypertension is just part of the aging process. Nam Vets would like to see it added to AO Presumptives. I doubt that will ever happen but you never know.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use