Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
diver
Hello all.. first of all I want to thank all of you for all the help you have given me through this process with the VA. I again have some questions for the expert here. I am rated 40% for at lumbar strain. I have an x-ray before and an MRI that was done after my C&P that show that I have DDD of L5 S1 and the MRI shows a 4mm bulge. The C&P examiner stated “1b) at this time, there is no diagnosis attributable to the bilateral hip pain” & “2b) lumbar muscle strains/sprains cause symptoms isolated to the low back. They do not cause problems in the legs like some other spine conditions. The most common symptoms of lumbar strain/sprain are: pain around the low back and upper buttocks, low back muscle spasm, pain associated with activities and generally relieved with rest. Lumbar sprain/strain involves the ligaments or muscles and not the nerves. Hence, there should not be any neuropathy symptoms.”
The examiner did not have the results of the MRI to look at.
My question is.
The VA denied my claim for sciatica because there is no current diagnosed disability. I have a diagnosis of Lumbosacral spondylosis without
myelopathy (SCT 48210000) would this be different then the lumbar strain and there for be the cause of the chronic hip pain. If so what should I do about it if anything?
The dr marked the claim is less likely than not.
Next question the examiner did an exam for peripheral nerve condition. For diagnosis he marked no and “there is no objective evidence to support a diagnosis of the claimed condition at this time. Now for the question foot dangles and drops, no active movement of muscles below the knee, flexion of knee weakened or lost. The doctor selected right: incomplete paralysis and if incomplete he marked mild. For the left foot he marked incomplete and moderate.
Looking at the rating that exact selection (if I read it correctly) is 10% and 20%. What should I do?
And for my chronic hip pain. It was denied because there is no diagnosis of hip pain. The doctor said there is no objective evidence to support a diagnosis of the claimed condition at this time. But later on in the exam sheet he marked pain to palpation in both hips. Hip flexion: 15
Right hip adduction (normal is 25 degrees) 15. abduction (normal 45) 15
Left hip post test ROM =20
Post test extension is at 0
External rotation ends (normal 60) 15
Internal rotation (normal 40) 15
Left hip adduction (normal 25) 15
Left hip abduction (normal 45) 15
Hip flexion (normal 125) 15 right hip
Yada yada lots more but I don’t want to bore you any more. If there is more you need please ask for it and I will get it for you.
For all of this there seems to me to be plenty of evidence for a positive outcome. So what do I need to do to get it?
Thank you
Diver
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
6
Popular Days
Feb 14
11
Feb 15
1
Top Posters For This Question
ArNG11 6 posts
diver 6 posts
Popular Days
Feb 14 2015
11 posts
Feb 15 2015
1 post
Popular Posts
ArNG11
If I may how did you injure your back? It depends on the evidence that you have or had at the time the decision was made. It's a big plus if you have inservice medical records that document the inju
ArNG11
Man, honestly NOD are the way to go to battle the low ball ratings however, you only have one year to do that via a Notice of Disagreement. In order to combat a decision that has become final, the o
ArNG11
Don't think in terms like that brother. You will go looney. Research, familiarize yourself with the CFR's and ask questions on here. There are a lot of knowledgeable people on here that will be mor
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now