Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Incorrect Effective Date

Rate this question


Question

Posted

I'm in the process of an appeal for an earlier effective date on a recent increase in disabilty compensation, and I'd like to get an opinion on how they apply the dates for my specific situation.

I filed a claim for a skin disability in October of 2001. The VA granted the service connection and assigned a rating of 10% in Feburary of 2003. In March of 2003 I filed an NOD stating that I felt the condition warranted a 60% rating. They came back and stated my condition increased to 30% and they made it effective to October 2001 (date of original claim). I filed another NOD within the one year time frame and they denied the claim with a Statement of the Case in June of 2004. I filed a notice that I would like to appeal. While awaiting the appeal I had my VA primary care physician write a report that the condition warranted a 60% rating. Finally in January of 2006 the VA granted me the 60% rating, however the effective date only went back to August of 2005 (the date my doctor wrote the report). Which leads me to where I am today.

If you file an original claim and it is on continuous appeal for 5 years and never finalized, shouldn't the effective date be the date of the original claim? I find it funny that they retroacted every rating increase to the date of original claim, until it the increase changed my monthly disability payment.

Anyone ever had this problem, and if so, how was it resolved?

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Stephanie-Welcome aboard here veteran-

you have done well so far with your claim and this is a common problem vets have to check for- the VA will often make errors in retro payments.

"Finally in January of 2006 the VA granted me the 60% rating, however the effective date only went back to August of 2005 (the date my doctor wrote the report). Which leads me to where I am today"

I would certainly challenge this with a NOD if the medical evidence warranted a rating of 60% prior to the report that said it did.

Did the doctor state when the disability actually rose to a higher level than the 30%?

It seems to me they need medical statement that from Oct 2001 to August 2005 your disability was in the criteria for 60%.

I have seen this done a lot in the past years- the VA picks the date of retro based on the date of a medical report.

They gave one of my local vets 40% for diabetes and used the date of his C & P for retro- DUH! He proved he had diabetes in the service and had filed his claim 12 years ago.

I told the vet if they dont cough up the rest of the money they owe him he could file a Sec 1151 claim and state he was disabled by VA care, if he got diabetes at the C & P!

They are working on his proper retro now.

If the VA does this to many vets and they don't question these errors-the VA saves money that belongs to veterans!

I am thinking- you could ask them to Reconsider the retro and that might go faster than a NOD-but you would still have to watch out for the formal NOD year of appeal date-

Either way- medical evidence should show that they erred in the date they used because the 60% did not happen the day the report was written.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted

We encountered the same problem regarding a claim for hypertension. We overcame that through evidence the VA overlooked in the service medical records of numerous high B/P readings before my husband retired. They rated it effective the date of the C & P exam, which was ludicrous. We appealed it to the Board, and were granted an earlier effective date, back to the initial claim date in 1993.

Do you have evidence that the severity of the skin condition equaled 60% while you were active duty? What medication in what strength were you prescribed to treat it? Any side effects from this medication? Could your doctor say with any degree of certainty that the condition has existed for several years, as likely as not while you were in the military?

Posted

I was thinking too that if this involves using creams pr skin preparations that affect your clothing-maybe you would be eligible for a clothing grant.

It isn't much but this BVA decision says why it should be applied for as soon as possible, if the med evidence supports the need for the allowance:

"Except as provided in paragraph ©(2) of this section, the

application for clothing allowance must be filed within one

year of the anniversary date (August 1) for which entitlement

is initially established; otherwise, the application will be

acceptable only to effect payment of the clothing allowance

becoming due on any succeeding anniversary date for which

entitlement is established, provided the application is filed

within one year of such date. The one-year period for filing

application will include the anniversary date and terminate

on July 31 of the following year. 38 C.F.R. § 3.810©"

This veteran received a clothing allowance due to a skin disorder:

veteran is entitled to a clothing allowance if he: (1)

"because of a service-connected disability," wears or uses

a prosthetic or orthopedic appliance (including a wheelchair)

that tends to wear out or tear his clothing; or (2) uses

medication that a physician has prescribed for a skin

condition "due to a service-connected disability" that

causes irreparable damage to the veteran's outergarments. 38

U.S.C.A. § 1162; 38 C.F.R. § 3.810.

from:http://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files1/9906183.txt

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted

Thanks for all the information.

My condition involves large puss filled boils to occur on over 40% of my body, and currently there is no cure, so I wouldn't be entitled to any special allowances. I was thinking my grant of the 60% rating might be considered a difference of opinion since my condition has gone unchanged since my original claim date in October 2001. I will go to my doctor and see if I can get another report that states I had this condition since that date.

Again, thanks for the help!!

Posted

If you can get the doctor to say that the condition, in its present state, was the same when you filed the original claim then the ED should be the date of the original claim. If not then VA is more likely than not going use the ole staged rating rule to say the 60 percent level was not met until the doctor said said so in 2006. NOD, NOD, NOD, IMO, IMO, IMO.

Ricky

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use