Jump to content
VA Disability Claims Community Forums - HadIt.com Veterans
  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.

    CHAT NOW

  • question-001.jpeg

    Have Questions? Get Answers.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery instead of ‘I have a question.
       
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title.
      I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
       
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story.
       
      Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.
     
    Leading too:

    exclamation-point.pngPost straightforward questions and then post background information.
     
     
    Examples:
     
    • Question A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    Rephrase the question: I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
     
    • Question B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
    Rephrase the question: I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?
     
    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial of your claim?”
     
    Note:
     
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • VA Watchdog

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0

M21-1Mr, Law?


FirstOldOne

Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The code of federal regulations is statutory in nature and it binds the VA. The M21-1MR is an internal policy regulation. If the manual is in contrast with the law, then it must secede to the law. Hence, you can not trump the CRF or USC with the internal regulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Admin

VA Law, VA Code, VA Manuals

The U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar, V.A. frequently requested manuals are listed below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have used M21-1MR to 'trump', their flawed applications of 38 CFR.in many of my claims.

I used one part of M21 (their doctor;s version) to succeed in my FTCA wrongful death case.

M21-1MR is available on line. I have never searched for the doctor's version.

I found the 2 page doctor's M21 instruction as to handling VA employees with emergencies but ( all I found was 2 pages) after spending many hours in a law library years ago, looking for something else.

I felt like I had found the Holy Grail, at first . It was part of my FTCA and 1151 claims evidence..

As I drove home however, I realized this is M21 statement could cause negligence./malpractice, if followed through in any similar VA emergency situation.involving a veteran who is also employed by the VA.

I hope they changed that policy.

Edited by Berta (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

http://www.veteranslawlibrary.com/files/CAVC_cases/2011/Castellano_09-3386.pdf

Given this unique history, it is not a surprise that substantive rules promulgated before
the APA might be contained in the M21-1 or a directive, letter, or other document. See Buzinski
v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 360, 369 (1994) (noting that Rank v. Nimmo, 677 F.2d 692, 698 (9th Cir.
1982), held that "VA handbooks, circulars, and manuals" may have the "force and effect of law"
if they prescribe substantive rules); Fugere v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 103, 107 (1990) (the
placement of a rule "in a procedural manual cannot disguise its true nature as a substantive
rule"), aff'd, 972 F.2d 331 (Fed. Cir. 1992).

provision or other VA directive that plainly is erroneous or inconsistent with regulation.
Compare Smith v. Shinseki, 647 F.3d 1380, 1385 (Fed. Cir. 2011) ("VA interpretations of its
own regulations in its Adjudication Procedures Manual [M21-1] are 'controlling' as long as they
are not 'plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.'" (citing Thun v. Shinseki, 572 F.3d
1366, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (quoting Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 461 (1997)))), Haas,
525 F.3d at 1197 (holding that an M21-1 inconsistent with regulation confers no rights on
claimant), and Fournier, 23 Vet.App. at 487-88 (discussing Haas), with Cohen v. Brown,
10 Vet.App. 128, 139 (1997) ("Where the Manual M21-1 and the regulation overlap, the Manual
M21-1 is irrelevant . . . . except where the Manual M21-1 is more favorable to the claimant.").
Edited by free_spirit_etc (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines