Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

C&p Report

Rate this question


Question

Posted

We recieved John's report today, Please tell us what this all means

PTSD----GAF score----60

Degenerative joint disease of lumbar spine is at least as likely as not

Right shoulder joint disease this is at least as likely as not

DMII

Peripheral neurpthathy both lower extremites this is at least as likely as not

right hip joint disease this is less likely than not

As far a hearing loss and tinninus although it is on discharge papers she wrote is not caused by or a result of his military service. ( will file NOD on this).

Can anyone tell us what this all means and what kind of rating he Might get

also filed for TDIU

Thanks in advance

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

PTSD----GAF score----60

Degenerative joint disease of lumbar spine is at least as likely as not

Right shoulder joint disease this is at least as likely as not

DMII

Peripheral neurpthathy both lower extremites this is at least as likely as not

right hip joint disease this is less likely than not

John M, I dont have a clue about the PTSD. Did they opinionate as to it was related to service?

Lumbar Spine DJD was 50 percent sure (benefit if doubt should be applied) win

Right Sshoulder was 50 percent sure (Benefit of Doubt Rule also applies) win

DMII and PN same: But remember DMII opens the door to a lot of secondary conditions down the road.win

Right Hip is less than 50 percent and will probally be denied.

Posted
PTSD----GAF score----60

Degenerative joint disease of lumbar spine is at least as likely as not

Right shoulder joint disease this is at least as likely as not

DMII

Peripheral neurpthathy both lower extremites this is at least as likely as not

right hip joint disease this is less likely than not

John M, I dont have a clue about the PTSD. Did they opinionate as to it was related to service?

Lumbar Spine DJD was 50 percent sure (benefit if doubt should be applied) win

Right Sshoulder was 50 percent sure (Benefit of Doubt Rule also applies) win

DMII and PN same: But remember DMII opens the door to a lot of secondary conditions down the road.win

Right Hip is less than 50 percent and will probally be denied.

Jstacy:

PTSD is related to Viet Nam Combat

Thanks for your reply, that gives us something to go on, If the rating would come up to what you said should we file for NOD for the hearing?

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

GAF of 60 plus a diagnosis of PTSD should get TDIU if not working. You are on a teter totter if you know what I mean could go either way. That said I would wait for a decision before I started preparing for a fight. Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Guest terrysturgis
Posted

Mrs. JOHNM, Absolutly NOD the tinnitus and hearing. My decision reported that on the exam I had when I got out of the service in 1970 it showed hearing loss. My MOS was artillery so that helped. I helped two veterans file for tinnitus. One an airplane engine mechanic and the other infantry ( M-60 operator). Both denied. Be sure to point out your husband's hearing loss as proven by SMR's. I am 10% bilaterial Tinnitus 0% hearing loss. From what I have seen you have to be almost deaf to get any percentage on hearing loss.

I also sent the VA a tape recording I made to my wife about Feb. 1970 full of explosions. Do more research on SMR's and send any other evidence you can come up with. Do not give up, please. Good luck! Terry Sturgis

Posted (edited)

51-60: Moderate symptoms (e.g., flat affect and circumstantial speech, occasional panic

attacks) OR moderate difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning

(e.g., few friends, conflicts with peers or co-workers).

A GAF of 60 is the high end of this scale meaning that your symptoms are teetering between moderate to mild symptomology.

Patrick

Edited by Patrick428
Posted
The VA has said that they no longer use the GAF as an indicator of severiety of PTSD, but some say they still use it. Logically, it shouldn't be used. PTSD is the same as "shell shock". Shell shock is a dramatic effect or impact on the memory of the combat warrior. Its an mental impression that is inescapable, persistent, constant.

GAF is scored on factors that may not be related to PTSD. For instance, suicidal tendencies may not be related to PTSD. Nor, other so-called symtomologies of GAF may not be related to PTSD.

For me, PTSD has impacted me in a way that I am isolated from everyone, by choice, as it did in Vietnam after 3 months in combat. Its constant worry about seeing people die and thinking that the next may be myself. Its a BITCH.... isolation, worry....... mental breakdowns

Yes, I have denied, time and again, that I am suicidal.......... but 20 years ago, I sold all my weapons..... 2 pistols, Beretta 92F and Walther PP-32, and my 308 rifle. Why? I didn't want a weapon that could take my life so close by, so I got rid of them.

Using a GAF score is just not logical to me in determining a rating for PTSD. NO.

Army I am new at this game but I do agree with you, i had a PTSD exam last monday, GAF 35. how can they but a number be side a mental condition, if they aint using it then why are they useing it<

it just doesnt make sense but then again nothing about the VA suprizes me..bigjim

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use