Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

1151 C&p

Rate this question


Question

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted

No- the fact they gave a C & P exam doesn't mean that- the results might though.

I have seen some VA doctors agree ,by documentation, to negligence by other VA doctors.

I experienced that when I won my FTCA wrongful death claim.

But it was a battle that took over 3 years.And lots of VA opinions went against the claim until I succeeded with a VA opinion that awarded the claim,because- unlike all of the other VA opinions, this one was based on all medical evidence of record.

The C & P you got was to determine if there was additional disability caused by any negligence.

It could be a supportive opinion to your claim. Hard to say.

It is so difficult to get a VA doctor to document any finding of VA malpractice that I highly recommend getting an Independent Medical Opinion if they deny the claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted

Thanks for your reply Berta,

They didn't address fault in the C&P report - could my civ Dr records be enough to prove fault?

The C&P only addressed disability - ROM = 0 , pain scale 7/10 , gate antalgic

Posted

Would the civilian doctor be able to state this in a formal Independent Medical Opinion?

I hope VA has his records but still-they do not look for evidence of malpractice-the claimant or an IMO doctor has to spell it all out for them.

The doctor has to state what negligence occurred by referencing the specific medical records, and then state what additional disability the negligence caused.

In my Section 1151 claim I had to send VA the med recs that showed my husband had heart disease by EKG in 1988 and was supposed to be given further cardiac testing.They never mentioned his EKG or any further tests.He had collapsed at the VA and they sent him home with Sudafed for a sinus condition.

After his death I found an ECHO and further EKGs-all indicating heart disease.I found a sinus xray that revealed his sinuses were clear but VA had continued the sudafed for 6 years.

The VA Cardiologist who had performed these tests had told me that "nothing" was wrong with his heart.

His autopsy clearly revealed a myocardial scar (the 1988 "sinus" episode) and significant heart disease.

With this documented VA medical evidence of heart disease and the autopsy , I was able to prove that VA caused to his death.

It takes the specific documentation of medical negligence or malpractice, and the documented results (additional disability or death) of what the malpractice caused for VA to award a Section 1151 claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use