Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Flat Feet Confirmed, Poossible New Or Cue Claim & Secondary Condition?

Rate this question


Question

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Feet issue disability denied more than 10 years ago.

Question #1 Does this Ortho statement from VA confirm that finally, truly that i have flat feet, pain and swelling? Not first time I received support socks or inserts, but this is a clear diagnosis. right>?

severe pes planus, posteriot tibial tendon dysfunction and chronic edema

(overall summary; other details include Vasc, Neuor, and Ortho specifics)

Question #2. Is this confirmed diagnosis possible new claim, CUE and / or a Secondary condition claim re"lumbar strain result of first condition "flat feet" and non support during service aka steel toe combat boots, low quarters and dress pumps..... etc??

*Note: my SMRs "are not SILENT and have several entries that give nexus to this now "confirmed condition" of flat feet, plantar facisitis, ankle strain and swelling. IMO should confirm feet condition and hopefully connect to constant ongoing pain with edema, varicos veins, etc and to SC lumbar strain, knee mensicus tear/ SC surgery .

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

You have to link it to Service and also show that it caused problems after 1 year. I am 30% for Pes Planus and at least they were fairly easy after I showed I had them in Service.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Cowgirl,

Regarding question #1, it sure sounds like a diagnosis to me.

As for question #2, you can claim any condition you want. But if the claim doesn't have the three requirements of service-connection, then the VA will simply deny the claim. Remember for direct service-connection you must show 1) an inservice occurance of an injury or manifestation of a disease, 2) a current condition with a clinical diagnosis, and 3) something connecting 1 and 2, such as continuity of treatment or an IMO, or both. For a presumptive claim you must be able to show that a presumptive condition listed under §3.307-3.309 manifested itself within the presribed time limits.

As far as CUE, if the claim was denied because it wasn't diagnosed at the time, this doesn't constitute CUE. A changed diagnosis or a condition being diagnosed at a later date doesn't meet the criteria of CUE. What was the actual reason for the denial ten years ago? Also, what does your entrance exam state when you enlisted?

If you are claiming this as secondary to your back, you'll need to ask your doctor whether the two are related. It is rather common for people that have lower back disabilities to have knee problems because of the different gait. But as far as flat feet, that would be a question for your doctor.

If you want to claim the lower back as secondary to flat feet, you'll still need to ask your doctor for an opinion. Having said that, you'll need to show that your flat feet warrant service-connection before the secondary lower back condition will be considered.

You also noted that your SMR's aren't silent for this. You'll need to take a look at the denial from ten years ago to find out what the denial was based on. If you posted the reason for the denial ten years ago, perhaps I can shed some light on this situation.

Vike 17

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use