Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

To Cue, Or Not To Cue, That Is The Question My Friends.

Rate this question


Andyman73

Question

I was looking over some of my recent claim info regarding a granted increase on my back from 10 to 40%. C&P Doc wrote that this is the natural progression of the disease(DDD). And she noted that there was an X-ray from my AD time that showed then the DDD already starting. . And she noted that this should have been the original diagnosis as well. The original rating was/is still for low back pain.

Can some of you well versed VA claim Warriors give me some input on this? Thanks!

Semper Fi.

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes you could reopen the claim but an NOD would be better imo to get a better EED. Reopenning the claim I believe they will just go back to your C&P Exam in 3 -15

if it was rated as mild to severe in 3 15 C&P Exam check your ROM it could be grater than 20% now it possible be 30% maybe 40% bringing your rating up to possible 70% or higher & the EED May go back to the original claim 11-98

You may think about getting a IME/IMO and Ask the Dr to use the VA guidelines pertaining to this particular disability or the causes from it.

Remember in a cue claim you can't use new and material evidence, they use only the evidence back when the claim was first filed only.

Although you probably would get a better EED.

Asknod or Ms Berta broncovet or JBasser would be better to ask about this type claim they all know a hell of a lot more in this VA system than I do.

they be would be the ones to ASK about filing a reopen claim or just File NOD and Disagree.

Here is a link to EED's

https://iris.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/930/kw/(%26quot%3Bprotected%20disability%20rating%26quot%3B)/related/1/session/L2F2LzEvdGltZS8xNDMzODc2MTM0L3NpZC9VKkRHVHRvbQ%3D%3D

Note I may not be understanding your question?

...............Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck,

I'm not sure I even know what I'm asking. Lol I guess I want to know if I should persue the CUE angle. Or take a different approach with new claims for the trip D and radiculapthy. Or take a run at both. Like a hamster on a wheel...going nowhere as fast as I can!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

your probably going to get the cue denied if you file for wrong diagnosis They can correct that, and your disability kinda falls under the next rating code for the appropriate rating..if your current disability don't have a code number or wrong code?

you should file for your other disability's with new claim if you have new medical evidence, or you can file NOD on the current issues your having...not so much a wrong diagnosis but for your Back & the Radiculopathy

if you already have a claim with these disability's? then file for an increase if they have worsen.

but you need medical evidence to support your claim.

............................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The current rating is 40% for 5002-5295 I believe. But the 5295 no longer exists as a code, it was changed in the mid 2000s. Funny thing is they didn't swap the code with the one that replaced the 5295. And that is for "low back pain/strain" which might also be lumbarosacrial strain...I think. The DDD and Radiculapathy was never claimed, is mentioned in my SMR, and is also mentioned in the MRI report from March of this year.. I think that covers the "new claim and new med evidence" requirement.

I think I will run with that, a new claim for the DDD and for Radiculapathy and see what I get. And just let the whole CUE idea pass on.

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

That's good,

I wish you the best and you get what you ask for.

Hang In There!!!

............Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use