Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Nod Time Lines

Rate this question


Question

Posted

How long is your NOD taking to be addressed.

I'm looking for the timelines for the following states:

1.Maryland

2. Virginia

3. North Carolina

4. Delaware

5. Georgia

6.Alabama

7. Tennessee

8.Florida

9. Nevada

10. California

11. Texas

12. Missouri

All information is welcomed. A fellow veteran in Florida just hit 601 days.

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Really depends on what Appeal route is requested. DRO Review is probably the shortest (1to 2 yrs) dependent on the quality of Compelling New & Material Evidence, DRO Personal Hearing (3 to 5 years, regardless of the quality of the required N&M Evidence) and finally the direct to BVA 41/2 ++yrs.

The BVA route could be shortened by choosing a Video Hearing over a Travel Board Hearing. The DC Hearing would be the longest wait. With the BVA, there are is always the possibility of a Remand which could add considerable time to the eventual Award or Denial.

Keep in mind, after an initial claim is denied, there is the mandatory VARO Automatic Review of the Denial triggered by the receipt of New & Material Evidence by the VARO Rating Department. There is always a possibility that a Sr Rater or actual DRO will review the Vet's Denial based on the N&M Evidence and either Award or continue the Denial. If the Denial is continued, the Vet will receive a Supplemental Statement of Case.

Semper Fi

Gastone

  • 0
Posted (edited)

Los Angeles R.O. - NOD filed 12 months ago, along with election of DRO process. This is a single contention claim, with a single additional piece of evidence submitted (An IMO/Nexus Statement). Currently rated 70%-not service connected. Claims simply don't get any easier than mine in terms of review. I simply need the DRO to open it. Waiting is so stressful!!!

Edited by bluevet
  • 0
Posted

Fat & bluevet, Gastone information is the best I know of to date if you're trying to determine a timeline. VA does not abide by any timeline while processing claims but from experience and comments of others you can develop a pretty good timeline.

My NOD filed January 2013 at Houston asking for DRO review at same time and supplying New & Material Evidence finished March 2015 approx. 820 days or 2 yrs and 3 months. Waiting is stressful and checking status on E-benefits drives you insane so find a hobby that you enjoy until you win.

  • 0
Posted

Fat & bluevet, Gastone information is the best I know of to date if you're trying to determine a timeline. VA does not abide by any timeline while processing claims but from experience and comments of others you can develop a pretty good timeline.

My NOD filed January 2013 at Houston asking for DRO review at same time and supplying New & Material Evidence finished March 2015 approx. 820 days or 2 yrs and 3 months. Waiting is stressful and checking status on E-benefits drives you insane so find a hobby that you enjoy until you win.

I don't see any problem with Fat's question. If he gets many responses over time, it may give us an overall picture of how each R.O. is performing with appeals. This information is not available anywhere. The weekly performance reports only include aggregate data for appeals, not broken down by R.O.s.

  • 0
Posted

Thanks guys..................

  • 0
Posted

Just talked to Seattle VA today, they said 522 days..

Sometimes the people around you wont understand your journey. They don't need to, it's not for them.

- Joubert Botha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use