Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

I9 Now 30 Days?

Rate this question


Question

  • Lead Moderator
Posted (edited)

Most of you know Veterans must meet 2 deadlines for an appeal:

1. You must file a Nod within 1 year of decision

2. You must file the I9 within 30 days of the SOC or SSOC.

I had almost "blown" it. You see, even my SSOC said it was 60 days, but, as Alex Graham (Ask nod) pointed out, it has been changed to 30 days.

Of course, I dont know what happens when the VA sends you a notice that says "60 days" then they deny you for not getting it done in 30 days. There may be an effective date for the 30 days, and the VA may have to change their notices to reflect that, first. Im not taking any chances because one of the VA's favorite things to do is to hire someone with a rubber stamp that says, "Claim denied as Nod was not timely filed" OR, "Claim denied as the I9 was not timely filed."

Those are no brainers, but a tragedy for Vets. I never did figure out how the VA can get away with sitting on my 2012 Board Remand for 3 years, when "expiditious treatment" is required. I find it interesting that VA gets to define "expitious treatment" in a way pleasing to them, but strictly enforces each of our deadlines, to the fullest extent the law will allow.

The reason I bring this up is so that other Vets dont make the same mistake I almost made. Get your I9 filed in time (30 days).

Is this the same "non adversarial" claimant friendly VA that VA talks about?

Edited by broncovet

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

According to the latest 38 Code of Federal Regulations Part 20 Subpart D §20.302 Latest update as of July 9, 2015 you still have 60 days from the date of the Statement of Case (SOC) or 1 year from the time you filed your claim. However, you have only 30 days from the Supplemental Statement of Case (SSOC).

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=69b572170cddbf9e18ab028ebebf2679&mc=true&node=se38.2.20_1302&rgn=div8

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

This issue is one of my chief complaints concerning the VA. It's only fair to impose strict limits on the VA, since they and the regs/law impose them on veterans.

  • 0
Posted

NEVER GIVE UP

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

To be sure.

When sending your timely NOD or SOC,SOCS OR with any timed Appeal.

When you get there letter saying you have 30 days 60 days or one year which ever the case maybe Be sure and to attach copy of that particular VA's letter with your Appeal. (I have attach VA letter**** showing my appeal is in the correct timely return of appeal.)

just so there is no discretions in the Dates.

jmo

...............Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted

Thank you toddt. On the "instructions" which came with my SSOC dated June 10, 2015, it says:

"How Long Do I have to Complete this form and file it? Under current law, there are 3 different ways to calculate how much time you have to compe and file this form (I9). The one that applies to you is the one that gives you the most time

a. You have one year from the day your local VA office mailed you the NOD you are appealing.

b. You have 60 days from the day that your local VA office mailed you the SOC.

c. Your local Va office may have sent you an update to the SOC, Called a SSOC. If that SSOC was provided to you in response to the evidence you or your representative submitted within the one year period described in paragraph 4(a) of these instructions, above and if you have not already filed this form, then you have at least 60 days from the time your local VA office mailed you the SSOC to file even though the one year period has already expired."

end of I 9 quote.

It sounds like this says 60 days to me. ISNT IT JUST LIKE VA TO CONFUSE THIS ISSUE AND THEN DENY VETS FOR FILING IT TOO LATE??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use