Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Worker Told Me Im Screwing His Company?

Rate this question


killemall

Question

So....

July 2014 I was bumped from 40 to 70 percent.

However I was denied sc for both knees...depression...sleep apnea and hypertension.

March 2015 I started the quick claim process for those issues plus a few others where I will be submitting more evidence once ready.

I decided that I should do a NOD for the issues that were not service connected in my July 2014 award letter since my one year window was almost closed.

The point was to make sure I could secure my back pay on those issues in the case that the va does SC some of them.

I explain why Im doing the NOD to the VA counselor and he tells me Im trying to screw his company.

I said what company?

He said the VA.

I explained that hes not a car insurance officer who is telling me that they dont wanna pay for my busted car.

I was very mad and pointed to the hearing aids ive been wearing 13 years since I was 22 and exclaimed..

Im xxxxxxx broken! Im not a car. Im a guy who did what I sighned up to do and you are here for me and not any xxxxxxx insurance company.

I then told him Ive never complained about anything in my life but I was considering going to higher about his remark of me screwing his company.

His composure changed very quickly and he filled out the NOD for me.

Whew....I was pissed off!!!!!

Anyways...is it true that a NOD can make me wait three years like he was saying?

In the past I would just do a nod within one year to show I disagreed and then submit claims for the same issues I disagreed with and a year later Id get my award and retro pay for the issues that were now service connected.

The nod was just used to lock in my origional claim date.

Has somthing changed???

Why is he saying two to three years?

Also. Can I just submit my new evidence for these decisions I disagreed with today into the quick claim process???

Or is somthing not gonna jive???

Thanks for any help and damn he pissed me off!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Killemall,

Yeah, see....that's the problem here, too many of them have the mentality that we are "screwing their company". They run it like a HMO, deny deny deny, ok here's a few dollars, go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

1. It should be illegal or unethical for VA employees to advise you against applying for benefits of filing a NOD. Like you, I had a VA employee tell me, "Oh, you can file a NOD, but it will be a waste of time and they will look at everything else and try to reduce you, holding up the rest of your benefits". Its simply not true. The VA has a procedure for rudicing benefits, and they can/do that all the time. BUT, there has to be evidence of same. There are "reduction criteria" such as you not seeking treatment for your SC condition for an extended period, but the criteria does NOT include: "Reduce a Veteran if he seeks an increase". That malicious rumor is false, you will likely be reduced if you meet the criteria for a reduction, not because you sought an increase, or because you have purple hair. These attempts at "reducing the backlong" by strong arming Veterans into dropping their appeals/claims are very bad.

2. As far as "the NOD making you wait 2 or 3 years", unfortunately, that is true. In fact, an appeal to the BVA is more like 4 years. Right now, for the most part, VA does not process both appeals and claims to the same Veteran at the same time. This is because their is only ONE paper copy of your cfile. Your Cfile can be sitting at the BVA waiting on an appeal or in your RO, but not both at the same time. SOME Vets have had their cfile scanned in, but most of the rest of us are still on paper. Further, I doubt that, if yours is one that is scanned in, that does not mean your claim will be "pushed ahead" of Vets who are still on paper. You can kid yourself but the backlog of claims is a reality, and the VA uses any excuse to try to make your claim another one of the longer ones. If VA can delay your claim another year, that is money in their pocket. It means your benefits, if you dont die or give up on your claim first, will be paid out of next years budget. The only thing Va likes better than delaying your claim to 2016, is delaying it to 2017 or 2018. The VA has delayed me for 13 years, so far. Yes, I got some benefits, but I never did get "any" benefits, none, zip, zilch, nada, back to 2002 when I applied.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The new system is be electronic, no more paper C Files. The EBenefits site accepts uploads of every document you have. If you cant upload it, your VSO can, and its free, no postage involved. Entire claims are contained in digital format, and can be accessed from multiple locations at the same time. They are processing every claim file into digital format as we speak, so it wont be long before everyone's CFlie is digitized. Unfortunately, the oldest files, the biggest files, take the longest, but this has been an ongoing process for a few years now and that is good news.

The old rules are ineffective. They need to allow new claim processing separate from appeals and DRO's. As long as the new claims are not related to the existing appeal, there should be no reason nor rhyme to deny Vets the right to claim what is lawfully due to them.

Decentralizing the VBA claims and putting them at VAMC locations would also help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use