Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Exam Findings As Evidence For Other Contentions

Rate this question


Andyman73

Question

Ok, I have a question. Can I use C&P exam findings/results as medical evidence to support a claim for increase or secondary contention? My issue is this, I just received 30% for pes cavus w/plantar fasciitis, bilateral. The evidence and opinions would support a claim for increase for my knees and ankles, since both are aggravated by my feet. This is a new award, however the L ankle and bilateral knee SCDs date back to 1998. Since this time my R ankle has become affected by the non-stop limping.

Also I had an EMG done, to both lower extremities to determine what effect on my feet, was from nerve impingement. Doc who did the EMG, had ordered an MRI of my back this past late winter. In the MRI report is noted L5-S1 moderate to severe narrowing of the neural foramina, bilateral, w/bulging disc that may impinge upon the nerve root, therein. She opined that the non-physical issues with my feet may be due to the back issue. Can these then be used as medical evidence for claims of increase for the known SCDs and for secondary for R ankle. Also, for shoulders and cervical/neck, since I over use my upper body to compensate for the back, knees, feet etc.?

As I understand it, secondary contentions are either caused by or aggravated by SCDs. And they do not need to be in STRs, correct?

Thoughts and opinions, please, all.

Thanks,

Semper Fi.

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I did on three conditions, noting that they are inferred conditions diagnosed by the VA's contracted doctor. I filed all three as new claims after I finally got hold of my C-File with the C&P examination results in it.

The VA kept them up for a few months as new claims, but then "moved" them over to some pending area due to them being secondary to a couple of conditions that I had on appeal under a NOD review. (All are still pending.)

I'll keep you posted if they turn out. Meanwhile, if you research "inferred condition" a bit, it will give you some information on these.

Mark

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Mark,

How long ago did you do this? Earlier this year I filed for increase for my SC L ankle. It was denied. No surprise, right? I never even considered a secondary for my R ankle because of the denied increase.

But now I have the 30% bilateral pes cavus with plantar fasciitis SCD. I would like to reopen the ankle claim and adding the R ankle as secondary.

Your thoughts are welcomed with an open mind.

Semper Fi

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes you can Andyman73,& try to view your C-File buddy!

when you file be sure and file on all your contentions...you need to get your EED entered & if you have to appeal then you will have a better EED.

Always use any Pro evidence you can that is pertinent to your claims...if you have to go get a IMO with a specialist qualified in the field of your disability....the raters''usually go with a good IMO over the VA Doc's.

but you could still use the VA Dr's if there favorable to your claim if there negative don't use them as your evidence.

jmo

..................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

PS

They look at an increase with a fine tooth comb...so get all your Ducks in a row.

remember good probative evidence wins claims.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck,

I plan to reopen several claims from earlier this year. They all can be tied in with the VA's own evidence.

And the one doc inferred that some of my foot issues are caused by my back. And she had ordered the MRI that she then used to opine in such a way that got my back increased from 10 to 40%. So...I am willing to bet on her opinion again.

I ordered my C-file back in May. So...lots of hurry up and wait.

Semper Fi.

Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Mark,

How long ago did you do this? Earlier this year I filed for increase for my SC L ankle. It was denied. No surprise, right? I never even considered a secondary for my R ankle because of the denied increase.

But now I have the 30% bilateral pes cavus with plantar fasciitis SCD. I would like to reopen the ankle claim and adding the R ankle as secondary.

Your thoughts are welcomed with an open mind.

Semper Fi

Andy

Let's see.....my C&P where the VA-contracted medical doctor (Veterans Evaluation Services) diagnosed my inferred secondary conditions was back in August, 2012. I had no idea that these conditions were diagnosed until I finally received my C-File in July, 2014, and then immediately filed for the new claims after that. Everything else was under a NOD when I filed.

What I did do was go ahead and get a private IME/IMO done for these conditions as well to help substantiate my claim and provide good backup for the VA doc's C&P information.

I'm still under a NOD waiting for the VA to finish a de novo review, and did a couple more C&P's back in July of this year, so we'll see how it all goes. If I were you, I'd go ahead and file the claim, and then get a private IME/IMO done for your new conditions to push the VA into reacting. Sounds like a great case you have!

Good luck!

Mark

Edited by MarkInTexas

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use