Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pulled A Quick One With My C&p

Rate this question


zeelarry

Question

Well, I went to my Kidney C&P this past Tuesday. The C&P Exam was posted on eBenefits today, with no surprises. As usual, I took all of my Lab Tests and Private Doc's write ups, that were pertinent to the kidney disease [which were already part of my C-file]. The C&P thanked me & said that it saved him time looking for the info.

NOW, FIGURE THIS ONE OUT- in reading over the whole C&P Exam, the Doc also did a write up on my Diabetes, GERDS, and ED. I just had the C&P done on these ratings back in March 2015, and claims were granted!!!!

The last section of the C&P Form is titled Remarks, if any: It appears that the Doc is given an opportunity to add any additional comments. In all 3, he wrote INCREASE. However, I do remember discussing some of the information that answered the questions, but NOT IN DETAIL. However, some of the critical ones were not discussed and are incorrectly stated on the Exam Form. In particular, the DM Exam Form asks about Regulation of Activities, and he answered NO. I just went through a NOD [Jan 2015] with VA about this, and based on my private doc's letter I was granted a higher rating due to restrictions of activities in April 2015.

I feel that this is a backdoor approach that VA pulled off, in an attempt to lower my ratings. This is absolute BS, especially if they go back & lower my DM %, back to pre-NOD!!!!!!!!!

Edited by zeelarry

Life is GOOD!!!! Could be better if VA did what it is paid to do.

100% - P&T - Heart [iCD] *

80% - Renal Dysfunction**

40% - Type 1 Diabetic [Not AO related]

10% - GERDS

0% - Gallbladder Removal [Currently under appeal]

0% - SCARS

0% - Hypertension [downgraded with 100% Heart]

SMC(K-1) - ED

SMC(S-1) - * & **

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have to tell you that the majority of my exam notes state some sort of error. As an example, I recently went to a VA podiatrist to perform an exam for a diabetic shoe recommendation. During the exam the Doctor noted that I have lost my protective sensation (consistent with 2 neurologists) and made the recommendation for diabetic shoes. Imagine my surprise when I looked at the notes which stated that my protective sensation is intact. I went to the VA center and complained so they had a second podiatrist look at my feet and he added an addendum to the first doctors notes stating the facts. I'd like to say that this sort of sloppy documentation is unusual but the truth is it happens all the time. How do you change a culture that has a little regard for accuracy and thoroughness.?

It seems to me that very few VA medical folks could maintain a job in private practice, hey, maybe that is why they work for the VA (I know that was snarky but sometimes I really wonder).

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the VA pays there employees pretty good especially the Dr's, off one day a week plus weekends,there salaries are compared Nationally.

But unfortunately some of the C&P Doc's write what ever they want. if you get the report and disagree with it request another C&P Exam to use a different Doc.

jmo

...............Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I personally feel part of the process should be that the exams are recorded automatically, the patient is notified, if they wish to not have it recorded they sign a waiver, etc.

At the end of every exam the doctor then goes over his findings with the patient to see if there are any mistakes... I.e. "regarding your cases of "characteristic prostrating" in connection with your migraines, which you referred to as "laying down", you reported varied numbers, would you agree that once a month is a fair average of this symptom?"

i think this would be better for the VA and for the VET. This way if a vet is scamming and says what he says, then gets 10% when he wanted 50% he goes says "i said i was laying down all day every day", the VA can pull the BS flag and say nope, you agreed with the finding in your C&P exam. If the VA is trying to scam you by BS'ing exams like this you can disagree on the spot. fewer NOD's requesting DRO hearings or new exams based on existing C&P exams, less backlog.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use