Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Outside Provider HIPAA Violation

Rate this question


green

Question

Has anyone taken action against a private provider regarding the improper sharing of medical information with the VA?  I recently went to see a private cardiologist for some tests on my ticker.  I told the office staff 3 times each during two appointments NOT to share my information with the VA.  Yep, you guessed it, they sent copies of the doctor notes and evaluative tests to the VA without my permission.

Green

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'd have to check to make sure, but I don't believe there is any monetary award payable to the complaining party in a HIPAA complaint.  Now, if you suffered some measureable damage or loss, hiring an attorney would be in order and you could sue.  At this point, there is no discernible damage as you've described the situation -- yet.

You may want to speak to an attorney yourself before you make any agreement with them if you're considering a financial settlement instead of filing a complaint.  It sounds like they won't be seeing you again as a patient.  If it were I considering settling with them in lieu of a complaint, I would have a lawyer contact them and do my talking for me.  Otherwise, if you feel you should file a complaint on principle, you have six years to do it.

Of course, get copies of any records you have there before you get too far down either road you choose.  

As as for self-reporting, the fact that they asked you to name a price to keep quiet tells me that they may not self report if they settle with you financially.  JMO.

 

 

 

Edited by lotzaspotz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

By the way, don't let them try to push you into a corner to make a decision by their giving you a week to think about it.   You have a six-year window, but like I said, they may want to know what you plan to do before deciding whether to self report.  You're sure that was a veiled attempt to get you to tell them how much money it would take to make the problem disappear?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I sincerely believe they will self report as there is much to lose otherwise.  I also expect that they feel bad about their mistake and want to make it right as best they can.  Word of mouth can be damaging, there is potential to lose a lot more than money.

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yes, I'm sure they feel badly but at the same time are sweating this out because it is a business, after all.  There won't be any "word of mouth" if you settle with them because settlements normally include your written agreement not to discuss the grounds or terms with anyone.  That's why I suggested that if you're considering something like that, you get an attorney involved.  Again, I guess this all hinges on how you feel about all this and what you will accept as amends vs. filing a formal complaint that stands on its own merit, since I don't think you can be awarded any compensation.

I'm very sorry this happened to you.  Hopefully, no damage has been done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Found out this morning that the VA provided the HIPAA violation related doctor office notes and results of tests to the RO rating officials.  Very interesting as it has nothing to do with the secondary claims I've filed.  The Doctor's office hired an attorney to represent their interests (even though I gave no indication I had planned on seeking legal action at this time).  The attorney asked me to provide her names of the people I spoke with at the doctor's office as well as copies of any documents I had proving their error.  I find this bizarre as we are not in a legal battle and as such they have no "discovery" rights.  I simply responded to the email and suggested she speak with the HR person who told me they had conducted an internal investigation, they were sorry, and admitted they had made the error (twice).

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Heres another thing...about the VA Choice card

 

VA sent me a letter and said they can't get me appointment within 30 days for a sleep study  so they sent me a letter and asking me to call this Number, my spouse called for me and that number is just a referral  service to find a private clinic close to my address that will accept the VA choice program ''sleep study''...well that's fine ,  but  in my opinion  look at how many times my Name & SS number has been broadcast over the internet or phone lines... that worry's me.

maybe I a bit paranoid   eh!

 

.........Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use