Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

When Is It Too Late to Submit Evidence Before BVA

Rate this question


MarkInTexas

Question

When is it too late to submit new and material evidence in an appeal?  I just got my Dear John letter from the VA this weekend in the form of a Statement of the Case from a NOD I had filed on an initial rating back in 2013.

I haven't filed my Form 9 yet, and know I'm a few days into my 60 day deadline clock, so don't want to waste too much time.  I'm just wondering that if I receive another IME or IMO if I can submit them before my case gets transferred to the BVA.

I haven't decided my options for hearings yet....video...in person....etc.  Any thoughts?

Thanks again!

Mark

 

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Right up till you get the VA "60 Day New Evidence Cut off letter."

The important thing is to never set on your N & M Evidence, you never know, it should and could trigger the VA Mandated Review of your Denial by a Sr Rater or DRO upon receipt of N & M Evidence. If the evidence is strong enough, an award could be granted well before your BVA Hearing is on deck. At the very least, if Reviewed, you'll get another SOC.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You can submit N & M E at any time up until the BVA judges (VLJ) pick up your case for decision making.

Sending in evidence in to the RO at this time might reset the Case Certification Process, whereby the RO "ensures" that the file they have is complete.

If you're worried about the time-frame for the VLJ, you can always request a "stay", buying you a year to submit your N & M E.

 

If you give them the evidence now, it could delay the day you set your Docket Number with the BVA.  This is the key.  Your case is heard in Docket # order generally.

I would rather delay at the BVA then get held up at the RO, especially if I knew I was going to the BVA.

So, I'd say submit appeals request (Get Docket #), request "stay" of case, submit N & M E (referencing Docket #), release the "stay".  Then wait. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What we're seeing is that VA will accept your N&M E and usually still issue a SSOC. They rarely, if ever, change their MO on this. SSOCs eerily resemble the SOC as if they never look at the N&M E.  With the advent of a "no returns'' policy at the BVA (i.e. no remand for de novo review at the RO based on N&M E), your best bet, and the one we're all seeing a lot of success with, is submission of the N&M E only to your BVA judge for a truly "new look' at it. If the IMO/IME is probative and well- documented, the VLJ is far more receptive (and intelligent) and a grant there is far more  likely. After filing CUE on a skin scarring reduction, I chose to include it in my laundry list on the Extraordinary Writ. VA  promptly gave me back the 10% and I submitted a new IMO from my PA-C on my skin to the VLJ at the hearing. He didn't quibble and granted the increase to 30%. If you do it right, you win. Eventually. Why it took me 21 years is a good question. Best of luck sir. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Does the submission of N & M E involving a pending BVA appeal actually reset and or add significant time to the final RO's Certification of the appeal to the BVA? I would think absolutely, if it's received shortly before the "60 Day Cutoff" for submission of N&M E. What if it's received 1 or 2 years before the RO Certification and 60 day  Evidence Cutoff?

I've had no experience with the BVA, but I would have a hard time setting on N&M E that I believed was so compelling as to to be a Real Deal Maker. Considering all the mistakes most Vets, myself included, made on their 1st foray into the Claims Arena; I still believe a N&M E triggered RO Review by a Sr Rater or DRO is worth consideration.

 As I recall, I think I recently read that after filing your 9, BVA hearings are still taking upwards of 500++ days.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the posts!  I have one case that I will need to file a NOD on, and the remainder on a Form 9 to the BVA.  This is a relief knowing that I'll have a little time to get another IME/IMO if needed.  I was worried that once I submitted my Form 9, all bets were off for new and material evidence.

My blood pressure just went down a few clicks knowing this.  Thanks again!

Mark

 

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use