Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Radiculopathy L4-L5 vs Chronic Sciatica Claim

Rate this question


Mo

Question

Hello all,

First off...BIG THANKS!!!!  I am a newbie (sorta) and have been following this site for close to 2 years. You all helped me go from 40% to 70% total last year! This is my first post so I hope I am asking it in the right place. (Haven't found an answer similar). 

I have initiated a claim for an increase of my PTSD. I am also claiming secondary disabilities to DDD (rated 40%)  such as Depression and Radiculopathy. But I noticed I don't have a diagnosis for it.  All my treatment records state DDD or chronic LBP until they recently starting stating "Radicular symptoms begining 6/18/15".  I have 21 pages of VA medical documentation for burning, altered gait, radical symptoms, inability to ambulate, in addition to over 50 days of work missed this year, 2 local ER visits, and 1 VA ER visit.

Do I file for Radiculopathy or Sciatica and if Awarded ask for retroactive pay from 2004?

I have my medical files and here is the following:

  • 8/13/15 MRI:

Test Name: MRI L Spine without contrast  

Reason for study: 32m with low back pain radianting to right leg

Clinical History: hx of lumbar radiculopathy L$-L% in 2004. Now with worsening pain, muscle spasms, and nubness in RLE

Report:
MRI lumbar spine without contrast.
Clinical Indication: 32M with low back pain radiating to right
leg.
Contrast: None.
Comparison: None.
Findings:
Segmentation: Normal.
Vertebral column: Vertebral marrow signal without evidence of
fracture or metastasis. Alignment normal.
L1-L2: Disc without significant dessication. Negative for disc
herniation or spinal stenosis.
L2-L3: Disc without significant dessication. Negative for disc
herniation or spinal stenosis.
L3-L4: Disc without significant dessication. Negative for disc
 herniation or spinal stenosis.
L4-L5: Moderate disc desiccation and bulge with dorsal annular
fissure and small central disc extrusion with minimal cephalad
migration. Negative for resultant spinal stenosis.
L5-S1: Mild disc desiccation and bulge with dorsal annular
fissure. There is a 10 mm extradural cyst within the right
lateral recess at the upper S1 vertebral level, consistent with a
discal cyst and resulting in moderate right lateral recess
stenosis with displacement and impingement of the right S1 nerve
root. Negative for canal or foraminal stenosis.
Impression:
1. Negative for spinal canal stenosis. 2. Degenerative changes
at L4-5 and L5-S1 with right-sided discal cyst at L5-S1 resulting
in moderate right lateral recess stenosis and impingement of the
right S1 nerve root.
 

  • 6/15/04 MRI 

L3-4: Mild, broad-based disk bulge. The spinal and neuroforamina are unremarkable.

L4-5: Focal, central disk extrusion with partial migration of the disks superiorly along the L4 level posteriorly. There is contact of the exiting L4 nerve root by the disk extrusion. The lateral recess is unremarkable. The spinal canal at the L4-5 level demonstrates flattening from the disks. There is high signal at the central part of the L4-5 disk, which may represent annular.

L5-S1: Mild , broad-basked disk bulge, but the spinal canal and neuroforamina are normal.

Impression: Findings consistent with disk extrusion at the L4-L5 level, with migration of the disk superiorly. Psossible annular tear at L4-L5 level.

  • 8/11/04 In service ER visit

Physical Assessment: Posture and gait both abnormal/ antalgic, abnormal striaight leg raise, ROM (limited to pain), and tender to palpation

Comments: HNP @ L4-L5, annular tear L4-L5

Diagnosis: Chronic sciatica

 

Sorry to be so long on my first post, but I want to give as much info as possible. Thanks so much in advance!!!

Edited by Mo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

first, i would ask your doctor to inquire why the neurology consult was cancelled. then i would ask if he or she would list it on your problem list.

 

my radiculopathy has been confirmed several times from emg's and also listed several times on my problem list. good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

VA did an evaluation prior to your ETS then?  You might talk to a VSO on that, if that evaluation/decision was defective, you might stand a chance for retro.  Maybe need a lawyer for a reopen on this, but if they failed to award you for a valid condition, and you can prove that based on your MEB and PEB, you could prevail.  They would give at least the min rating.

 

If the gait was altered in 2004,and you had pain, and you were not awarded anything from that, it might be worth checking into.  Remember, regulations state that if a condition causes you pain, then you must be granted at least the minimum rating for it (10%).  If you can establish that you had pain reported in the MEB/PEB in 2004, and then document the back/leg condition as it progressed over the last 11 years, they could grant a staged rating as the condition got worse. 

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

Radiculopathy is not a diagnostic code.

It is a medical condition affecting the nerves.  They have to ID which nerve is affected, and rate the condition based on the DC that applies.  Typically, they rate L2 to S1 nerve impingement as sciatic nerve problems. Depending on the level, it can also be rated as the femoral nerve as well.  Your issue looks like sciatic nerve impingement.

Levels of disability depend on the severity of the condition. Paralysis/partial paralysis  is listed as;

 Mild (10%) to moderate (20%) are typically nothing but sensory issues.  Mild are just subjective symptoms alone, where the vet reports numbness, tingling/burning sciatic pain.  Moderate is mostly sensory as well, with objective evidence (medical examination, EMG/NCV tests).  Moderately severe (40%)is a step up that would include motor sensory deficit, abnormal gait, weakness, atrophy would be mild at this level.  Severe (60%) would be the worse than just moderate.  Finally, complete paralysis (80%) would be that the nerve is not functioning at all, you couldn't walk with this condition, atrophy and circulation issues would exist. 

 

Below paralysis, is neuritis and neuralgia.  Both of these are also staged from 10% up. 

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i would file for radiculopathy. as for being awarded retro back to 2004, i dunno. don't see a confirmation of it then. have you had any emg's? did they confer the diagnosis? and, if so, how far back do they go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i would file for radiculopathy. as for being awarded retro back to 2004, i dunno. don't see a confirmation of it then. have you had any emg's? did they confer the diagnosis? and, if so, how far back do they go?

I haven't had any EMG's yet. They keep canceling my consult to the Neurologist. The only confirmations I have are:

  • 2004 ER visit while in service stating injury and  a diagnosis of "Chronic Sciatica" > 6weeks
  •  9/11/15 secure messages from my pact MD stating, "... I have yet had the opportunity to meet Mr. XXXXXX but my understanding is that he has been treated for Radiculopathy and nerve pain." "...placed a consult for him to be seen by neurosurgery for further evaluation. I do see they cancelled the consult but I am not sure why..."
  • 9/06/15 MRI stating, "history of radiculopathy L4-L5 in 2004
  • 7/29/15 VA ER Visit stating, "acute lumbar pain with radicular symptoms....altered gait...exquisitely ttp pf lumbar spine, right and left sacroiliac joints, and right hip....sensation to pinprick diminished in right calf..."

I'm wondering if there is enough evidence there without a clear diagnosis or should I ask my PCP to note it on my Computerized Problem List via Secure Messaging until I get to Neuro....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If you have never put in a claim for chronic sciatica (from 2004 medical records) you will not be granted retro for it.  If you were denied from a 2004 claim, never appealed, you can reopen, or CUE, depending on the file contents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use