Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Degenerative Arthritis Secondary to Lower Back Pain

Rate this question


Anthony61

Question

I served in the Marine Corps from 1980-2000. During Boot Camp and throughout my 20 career and even now, I suffer from incapacitating lower back pain, which is far worse today than it was during my years of active duty. The back issue was noted during my VA exam upon retirement, and didn't receive at rating in 2000 after I retired. In 2014, I decide to file a claim due issues with my, which had worsened. In May 2015, I was awarded a 10% disability rating under VA Code 5235. I know for a fact the lower back pain I experience today is a direct result of the trauma, wear and tear and misuse of my back during my military career. A recent MRI shows (Mild facet hypertrophic changes with congenital shortening of the lumbar vertebral pedicles resulting in mild narrowing of the neural foramen at the L3-4 through L5-S1 levels bilaterally. The central canal is patent throughout the lumbar region). My Doctor stated these are just terms that mean I have Degenerative Arthritis. I'm trying to determine if I should file a secondary claim for this issue under my current disability rating for my back pain or approach the Degenerative Arthritis as a separate claim seeing the range of motion has already established under my current disability rating?      
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

It sounds like the severity of the service connection needs to be looked at. Good luck and welcome to Hadit

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I served in the Marine Corps from 1980-2000. During Boot Camp and throughout my 20 career and even now, I suffer from incapacitating lower back pain, which is far worse today than it was during my years of active duty. The back issue was noted during my VA exam upon retirement, and didn't receive at rating in 2000 after I retired. In 2014, I decide to file a claim due issues with my, which had worsened. In May 2015, I was awarded a 10% disability rating under VA Code 5235. I know for a fact the lower back pain I experience today is a direct result of the trauma, wear and tear and misuse of my back during my military career. A recent MRI shows (Mild facet hypertrophic changes with congenital shortening of the lumbar vertebral pedicles resulting in mild narrowing of the neural foramen at the L3-4 through L5-S1 levels bilaterally. The central canal is patent throughout the lumbar region). My Doctor stated these are just terms that mean I have Degenerative Arthritis. I'm trying to determine if I should file a secondary claim for this issue under my current disability rating for my back pain or approach the Degenerative Arthritis as a separate claim seeing the range of motion has already established under my current disability rating?      
 

do i understand that you are currently 10 percent for your back and you want to file an additional claim for the same area? if not, then please correct me.

 

first, the va is going to treat the thoracic and lumbar area as one. if you are experiencing worsening in the area you are connected for, then file an upgrade. but i don't think you can do what you are asking. i am currently 40 percent for my back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have degenerative arthritis of the lumbar and thoracic (cervical also, but rated seperately) which is counted as one.  You get 10% for arthritis found by x-ray.  That is all you can get for arthritis, unless your bedridden etc..  Now your rating is based on range of motion, which they gave you 10%.  So if you did get service connected for arthritis, you would still be at 10% as you cant piramid these two for the same body part.

However, there is an advantage to get the SC for arthritis, as that would be a stepping stone to get other body parts Secondary to your arthritis.  I have two adjoining joints that where secondaried because of arthritis.  And then once they were SC'd (secondary) if claimed increase and got 20% for both because of range of motion.

If I were you, I would file for a increase and new for secondaries on any adjoining joints.

Appearently arthritis spreads...

Hamslice

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

do i understand that you are currently 10 percent for your back and you want to file an additional claim for the same area? if not, then please correct me.

 

first, the va is going to treat the thoracic and lumbar area as one. if you are experiencing worsening in the area you are connected for, then file an upgrade. but i don't think you can do what you are asking. i am currently 40 percent for my back.

iceturkee, thanks for the quick response. My thought was to file a separate claim for degenerative arthritis rating code 5003 based on the findings of the MRI. The 10% I'm currently receiving under rating code 5235 was based on chronic lower back pain and listed as a back condition. At the time I filed for the lower back issue, I knew nothing about the degenerative arthritis a this came about a year after filing for the 10% I currently have. Filing for claims and increases is somewhat new to me, so I'm just looking to those with experience with the VA claims requirements.

Thanks

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have degenerative arthritis of the lumbar and thoracic (cervical also, but rated seperately) which is counted as one.  You get 10% for arthritis found by x-ray.  That is all you can get for arthritis, unless your bedridden etc..  Now your rating is based on range of motion, which they gave you 10%.  So if you did get service connected for arthritis, you would still be at 10% as you cant piramid these two for the same body part.

However, there is an advantage to get the SC for arthritis, as that would be a stepping stone to get other body parts Secondary to your arthritis.  I have two adjoining joints that where secondaried because of arthritis.  And then once they were SC'd (secondary) if claimed increase and got 20% for both because of range of motion.

If I were you, I would file for a increase and new for secondaries on any adjoining joints.

Appearently arthritis spreads...

Hamslice

 

Hamslice, thanks for the advice as this all new to me. To ensure I'm tracking, I should file for an increase on the 10% I currently have for my back condition (chronic lower back pain) under 5235 and new secondaries for L3-4 through L5-S1 joints?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hamslice, thanks for the advice as this all new to me. To ensure I'm tracking, I should file for an increase on the 10% I currently have for my back condition (chronic lower back pain) under 5235 and new secondaries for L3-4 through L5-S1 joints?  

i would agree with hamslice's recommendation. in theory, it should be easier to receive primary and secondary service connections based on arthritis in the back.

and arthritis does spread. well, it really doesn't spread per se. but arthritis of the spine can lead to arthritis of the hips and feet and so forth.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use