Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Second-signature review on SMC claims?

Rate this question


mbl22885

Question

My claim is currently at pending decision approval. I talked with my VSO from the VFW today and it told me it was "Under review for a second-signature." I looked around the web and saw stuff mostly saying a second-signature is required in bigger back payments, but I also found an OIG report stating " VSC management has a policy requiring second-signature review of rating decisions involving higher levels of SMC." So is a second-signature in my case just normal procedure or should I start to get excited?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Lead Moderator

I agree with the VSO here.  Ebenefits has been wrong multiple times for me, personally.  There is one thing that is reliable on ebenefits, however.  Its the AB8 letter.  The VA does not want to have you print out a letter that you are 100 percent if you are only 40.  One thing, tho, even about AB8 letter.  It will only go back to December of the previous year, so people think that is there effective date, when that really means there was a Cola adjustement on Dec1 of each year, even tho the Cola is often zero. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

This is a problem I have with VSO's, your VSO should know that EAP equals CUE.  VA gets away with it anyway, but it amounts to a denial of due process for the Veteran.  You see, the EAP is "Extroridary Awards Program", where 2 signatures are required where retro is over 25 k.  But the problem with that is, the Veteran is supposed to be able to request a hearing at any stage..and the Veteran can not request a hearing on this.  

My recommendation is you simply wait as there is nothing else to do.  However, the credibility of your VSO just dropped about 4 notches IMHO.  1.  He should know that EAP equals CUE, and 2.  He should certainly not tell you its awaiting 2 signatures even if that is the case.  He may be trying to do a good job and let you know in advance, but I think he should have kept his mouth shut.  

http://thomasandrewslaw.blogspot.com/2010/08/macklem-eap-equals-cue.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This is a problem I have with VSO's, your VSO should know that EAP equals CUE.  VA gets away with it anyway, but it amounts to a denial of due process for the Veteran.  You see, the EAP is "Extroridary Awards Program", where 2 signatures are required where retro is over 25 k.  But the problem with that is, the Veteran is supposed to be able to request a hearing at any stage..and the Veteran can not request a hearing on this.  

My recommendation is you simply wait as there is nothing else to do.  However, the credibility of your VSO just dropped about 4 notches IMHO.  1.  He should know that EAP equals CUE, and 2.  He should certainly not tell you its awaiting 2 signatures even if that is the case.  He may be trying to do a good job and let you know in advance, but I think he should have kept his mouth shut.  

http://thomasandrewslaw.blogspot.com/2010/08/macklem-eap-equals-cue.html

Thanks for the info.

So the second-level signature is only used in claims where the retro pay exceeds 25k and higher levels of SMC do not require a second-level signature, per VA policy?

I'm taking away that no matter the case, the second-signature is basically a violation of due process and I have cause to file a cue.

Is this about right?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Bronco is right bud, and that is why I don't recommend VSOs to anyone anymore. Good luck and keep us posted

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Bronco is right bud, and that is why I don't recommend VSOs to anyone anymore. Good luck and keep us posted

I'm taking his word. I was just trying to clarify. Starting to get excited, but I know it's best to wait until I know the outcome in final.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Read the linked article, Macklem.  I dont claim to give legal advice. While  VA has "done away" with EAP, they pretty much do the same thing, put lipstick on the pig and take her to the dance.  VA can call the pig "Miss America's Sausage and eggs" but, she still looks like a pig to me.

What you described sure sounds like an EAP to me.  

Before you cut that pig up into pork chops, lets give her the "once over".

1.  HOusebound is currently about 347 per month.  If you figured you were awarded housebound, SMC S, it would amount to "about" 25k retro if you were awarded back to "about 2008 or 2009".   So, look at your records and see if an effective date of 2009 or earlier makes any sense.  Remember, you dont have to apply for SMC S, its inferred when you meet the criteria.  Did you get a "single" 100 % rating in 2009 or earlier?  Or, did you get rated "100 plus 60" in 09 or earlier.  If so then maybe you can have bacon and eggs, and invite her "for" dinner, lipstick and all.  

However, if a SMC back to 2009 or earlier is not likely, then your retro is likely less than 25 k.  The old EAP was 10 years OR 25k.  Believe me, when VA pays you a 25,000 dollar or more check, they check that over pretty thoroughly.  You just wont know there were 2 signatures.  2.  Other SMC's will give a different retro, but you can figure them up, too. 

My advice is to simply do nothing but WAIT.  But, you could EMAIL your VSO and "ask" him for an explanation as to why 2 signatures.  Then save his response "just in case".    If he is a snake, he will get suspicious, but if he is dumb, then he will likely explain.  I think that VSO is either ignorant, or a snake out to bite you.  

       BUT...there are good VSO's who work hard, but just dont quite really understand the VA regs.  And those guys are good people too, not everyone needs to be a rocket scientist to fill out a 21-4138 or other forms and get the right address to mail them to VA.  You dont need to tell em that you were born at night but not last nite.  

    Chances are good you get your benefits, but I have found over and over, with Va its best to CYA.  So just keep a record..what VSO said, when he said it, whether it was by phone, and his name plus time of call.  (This is why I love email, I have been emailing my VARO director.  Now, there is a record of every word he told me.  I asked him to do this because I am hard of hearing, which is true, it just happens to be an "extra benefit" that I can HOLD HIM Accountable to every word he writes in an email.  I love that!  

    Keep a great record, and wait for your decision.  THEN, when you appeal, if its in your best interest, you can allege a Macklem violation and CUE, if necessary.  

 

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use