Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Increased eval/Re-open/or Secondary - Quadriplegic

Rate this question


ekgilley

Question

Long story coming.  In 1991, my husband  was in a Light Armored Vehicle accident which killed his best friend. My husband did  not adjust well after this, and started having gruesome and violent hallucinations. Sixteen years later in 2009, my husabdn's PTSD was becoming horrifying again.  He stopped talking for a month.  I panicked and called the VA hospital where he went for his regular spinal cord injury treatment ( he was considered a catastrophic non service connected veteran).  I filed a NEW claim for PTSD, with all of the evidence from his LAV accident in 1991, notarized affidavits from his girlfriend at the time stating he was suicidal, evidence of the LAV accident,etc.  He was given a 30% service connected rating in 2009.  He was then able to receive proper treatment at the lake City VA Hospital.  In 2011, my husband died at the age of 39 from complications due to his quadriplegia.  

I receive no widows benefits.  I would like to re-open his claim from 1992 so that he could get a 100% service connected rating.  It is what he deserved, and I feel he was stomped on and spit out by the Marine Corps and the VA.  I am not concerned about back pay or accrued benefits, although I won't turn them down.  What is the best way for me to get the rating he deserved?  Reopen his claim using the 30% service connection as evidence for his PTSD/quadriplegia?  Or do I claim his quadriplegia is secondary to his PTSD?  Or should I just try to get his successful 30% increased to 100%?

 

Thank you so much for this site.  I have avoided this for 4 years, and it may be too late.  But I really want to give him the rating he truly deserved while he was alive.

Edited by ekgilley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

  I'm truly sorry for your lose.

  Welcome to the forums as we have many people here that help many veterans and their families in guiding them in the right direction. They may ask you to upload the last decision with all of his personal information blacked out.

  It sounds like he was "lowballed". If we can find that evidence was not used or a mistake on VA's part you may be able to file a appeal for a CUE. That would force them to reopen the case. I am no expert in CUE's and my advice is to be taken with a grain of salt. Either way you need to find a good VSO/attorney that will help you because your looking at a very large sum of back pay if you achieve in winning the claim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

ekgilley,

Welcome to Hadit.  My deepest sympathies for your loss.  We have some truly dedicated and knowledgeable folks here, like R3dneck mentioned.  Several of which are lawyers that specialize in VA claims cases.  Your husband was definitely victimized multiple times by the LAV tragedy, over and over again. 

Berta has gone through a myriad of claims involving her husband while he was alive, and even more so after his passing due to negligence on the VA's part.  I feel she will be particularly helpful in your situation.

Again, welcome.

Semper Fi.

Andyman73

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Andyman, it was what my husband ( dead 21 years in 2 weeks) went through with VA that brought me here to help others. He and then I dealt with so many different VA related issues, it became quite an education.....and his death had meaning because it has helped others.....

But I am baffled by this situation.....and at a loss as to what this widow should do

Did you ever file for DIC? There would be no accrued benefits unless you filed a 21-534 DIC application within the first year after his death and then you became the claimant on any pending claims he had at death, that you succeeded in getting a SC accrued rating for.

as there any claim pending when he died that you continued or was this the last denial:

 "When he originally filed his claim for total and permanent disability due to quadriplegia ( the file makes no mention of PTSD or suicide), he was denied  his claim due to his own negligence."

Can you scan and attach their Reason and Bases part of the decision and the evidence list, for that denial (cover C file #, name, address etc prior to scanning and attaching it here.

" He was given a 30% service connected rating in 2009."

Was the 30 % SC for the PTSD?

 " He was then able to receive proper treatment at the lake City VA Hospital.  In 2011, my husband died at the age of 39 from complications due to his quadriplegia. "

Is that exactly what the death certificate said? A death certificate usually would have specific cause of death as the primary condition as then contributing conditions listed as well.

Was an autopsy done?

This might be a very difficult claim and I really dont know how you could re open it as his survivor.

 

Have you contacted PVA (Paralyzed Veterans Association) for a vet rep?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Was he incountry Kuwait or Iraq , when the LAV stressor occurred?

"I receive no widows benefits.  "

Did you ever apply for DIC? If so can you post the denial as to their Reason and Bases? Are you still within a one year period from date of that  denial?

I am sure you could still apply for DIC but the actual cause of death and any contributing causes on the death certificate would have to be service connected. VA deemed the suicide attempt ,causing the quadriplegic disability, as willful misconduct. Did you husband ever have private MH treatment records that perhaps VA never obtained or never knew of, that revealed his PTSD was catastrophic to the level it would possibly lead to a suicide attempt?

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use