Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Veterans Affairs pays $142 million in bonuses amid scandals


pacmanx1

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

WASHINGTON – The Department of Veterans Affairs doled out more than $142 million in bonuses to executives and employees for performance in 2014 even as scandals over veterans' health care and other issues racked the agency.

Among the recipients were claims processors in a Philadelphia benefits office that investigators dubbed the worst in the country last year. They received $300 to $900 each. Managers in Tomah, Wis., got $1,000 to $4,000, even though they oversaw the over-prescription of opiates to veterans – one of whom died.

The VA also rewarded executives who managed construction of a facility in Denver, a disastrous project years overdue and more than $1 billion over budget. They took home $4,000 to $8,000 each. And in St. Cloud, Minn., where an internal investigation report last year outlined mismanagement that led to mass resignations of health care providers, the chief of staff cited by investigators received a performance bonus of almost $4,000.

As one of his final acts last year before resigning, then-VA secretary Eric Shinseki announced he was suspending bonuses in the wake of revelations that VA employees falsified wait lists to meet wait-time targets — ostensibly as part of efforts to secure the extra pay. But he only curtailed them for a sliver of VA executives -- those in senior levels of the Veterans Health Administration, which oversees health care.

The agency has continued to pay performance-based bonuses to nearly half of agency employees, including in health administration, according to data provided to USA TODAY by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee. In all, some 156,000 executives, managers and employees received them for 2014 performance.

OK ,I wanted to give a site for others to check it out. Also you can check to see who got a bonus, all you have to do is click on your state and it will come up.   The average bonus was about $3,000.00 or more. So tell me how in the heck can a Hospital Houskeeping Officer get a $3000.00 bonus.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/11/11/veterans-affairs-pays-142-million-bonuses-amid-scandals/75537586/

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Maybe the Hospital Housekeeping Enlisted only got $300 bonuses... :blink:

Edited by Vync

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

No cost of living increase for you, but bonus for meeeeeee,

Sorry son's a bitch's,,

Hamslice

You are so right!

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doing the math, $142M / 280k employees = average of $507 per employee.

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i finally sat down and crunched some numbers.  I have always though the cost to build new hosptials, maintain old ones, hire and retain physicians/nurses etc was not cost effective for veterans care.  I crunched some numbers if we just added vets to the existing federal government health care network.  A new regime of regulations based on ratings could come into effect.

I couldnt find numbers of vets based on rating only a 10-60% and 70%+

so i just pulled everyone together from 10-100% which is a very liberal figure of the total cost.................\

here it is....................

 

Currently for a individual with dependents the government pays $437.69 while the employee pays 197.23 for the standard option for BCBS for a total of $634.92 per month which equals 7619.04 in premiums per year.

Given that 30% rating will give you “free” no cost to you healthcare at VA facilities we will approach this from a no cost to vet.

Currently as of 2013 there were 2,208,186 vets with 10-60% rating and 965,943 with over 70% rating.  Combined that is 3,174,129 total vets from 10% to 100%.  In terms of healthcare only those with 30% or more qualify for that “free healthcare”  to be liberal with it.. lets consider all vets in that number 30% or more.

The VA submitted a budget this year for  1.675 billion for construction.  Removing the grants for state extended care facilities and cemetary work we are looking at 1.55 billion for major and minor construction. 51 Billion is being spent yearly on Medical Programs that does not include joint DOD funds and VET choice act.

A total of 52.55 Billion is spent on health care and construction of new facilities as well as maintenance of other ones.

Now back to FED HEALTH insurance coverage, this is based off the pamphlets for a Blue cross fed health plan..

Medications (10) per month: 1200 yearly

Mental Health Apt (4) per month: 1200 yearly

Inpatient Admission (2) per month: 6000 yearly

Ambulance (5) yearly: 500 yearly

non generic RX: 600 yearly

Sleep Study: $90 one time

 

That means to include the premium this vet would have paid $8512 that would nominally now be paid for by the VA. Adding in the premium cost that is now $16,131.04 per year.

So now we have by multiplying 16131.04 by 3,174,129 vets over 10% we come up with 51,202,001,864.16

For roughly less that the total spent on health care and construction for next year we could pay for every vet over 10% to have a standard BCBS plan,  be brought inpatient 2x a month, weekly mental health counseling, ambulanced 5x a year, 10 generic prescriptions per month and a sleep study .

 

 

i have always thought it would be cheaper and better for everyone (but the VA union) to just close down the hospitals, offer severance (one time large cost) for the medical staff (plus the uptick in need for care at local facilities would necessitate hiring in the local areas where the hospitals already were, the best ones would get jobs right away) and just put everyone onto FED employee plans.

 

This is separate from the above as far as discussion purposes.

My thoughts would be a revamping of the rating medical care criteria.  I know this isnt popular maybe, but i will say what i feel.  not everyone who is 30% needs no cost health care.  i have 30% for my feet.  they hurt they make it impossible to run any long distance, standing too long causes alot of pain, but it isnt the same as someone who is experiencing migrains so bad that they have to leave work and spend days in bed because of splitting migraines (i have those two, but if i had to choose i would take 2x the pain in the feet i have now to get rid of those headaches).

I think that medical care could be rated as well alongside rating for compensation based on your loss of ability to work to make up for it.  Anything that is directly SC would be covered 100% but anything else NOT SC would be inverse of the comp rating you have from 70% to 30%

If you are 70%+ you are covered 100%

If you are say 50% the inverse from 100% is 50% so you pay 50% of the premiums/co pays as set for federal employees

If you  are 30% your inverse from 100% is 70% so you pay 70% of the premium.  If you have a claim that bumps you to 70% and a EED date going back 2 years you are not only retro'd for that comp but also the health costs.

It would need more details and like i said some peoples 30% is much worse than others and that should be taken into account. 

Its not perfect but i think most vets would rather have that and go to the doctor and facility of their choice than have to drive to a VA hospital.

 

Edited by USMC_VET

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use