Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

CUE: How detailed should my assertions be?

Rate this question


propp3

Question

Filed for a CUE last July, multiple assertions/issues, all relation to my original denial of a knee claim(never appealed) and a RO decision(on remand) to increase my % for my back condition, also final after BVA appellate review. All issues are old, dating back to '92(knee claim) '95(BVA remand to the RO re: my back) and '96(the BVA appellate review).

I've don lots of case law and regulation research, applicable at the time, supporting my assertions..all my cites/etc back up my assertions of what should have been done/followed, and what was done or not done, wrong(cites of case law, COVA decisions).

The RO passed(said nope), the DRO did not find in my favor(awaiting SOC), and I filed my VA-9/appeal to the BVA. Now I'm completing my summary, further presentation of issues, evidence in support, all my cites, etc.

My question? How detailed should I be? I've rec'd advice to keep it short, brief...a few pages. But every research I done about CUE says otherwise...explaining the need for detail/detail/detail. My statement/letter will probably end up after editing at a good 30-40 pages in length. Even with editing to eliminate redundancy, I feel all the issues I've asserted and a forensic eval of the evidence...with supporting case law/regulation/BVA remand instruction('95) cites included...is all necessary and important in making my case.

As I responded to one who advised almost absolute brevity....brevity hasn't accomplished shit for me in the past. After reading my VSO briefs and quotes of case law(about 2 pages), I was stunned by the *lack* of argument. 20 years ago I didn't know any better and thought and relied on the VSO(mine is DAV) as the *duty expert*. But like I said, it didn't work then(brevity) and I have little confidence it'll work now. Hell, I just recently found a case cite I think is of *extreme* importance to my CUE claim(Hyder v. Derwinski), and my VSO didn't mention...discuss with me, or even put forth in argument. I met my VSO appeal specialist for the 1st time only 20 minutes before my DRO hearing last June.

Opinions, advice? Anyone here win a claim of CUE and if so, how detailed were your assertions and arguments and presentation of evidence?

Prop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Pull up any similar case that you can find in the CAVC on the subject matter.  Note how extensive they are, and how direct and to the point their decisions are.  They don't cite paragraphs of other case law unless it is absolutely needed, only a sentences most of the time, that directly apply to the current case.

Same thing with BVA cases.  Use enough that nobody can question what the meaning is, brevity is courtesy.  30 or 40 pages would need be a very complex case with a long history.  Figure on a format.  Always use names, dates and times whenever you can.  Copy and paste their own words at every opportunity, as brief as possible.

1. What they did.

2.  What was wrong and why. Cite violations here.

3.  What is right, with citations showing what should have been done according to USC/CFR/M21.

4. How you want it corrected, and why.

 

Same format, for every topical issue you want corrected.

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Opinions, advice? Anyone here win a claim of CUE and if so, how detailed were your assertions and arguments and presentation of evidence?"

yeah, I have won a few, helped some members here who won CUE and my daughter says the NOD I prepared for her contained a statement of CUE as well.

My assertions were very brief.After I charged them with violation under auspices of CUE ( 38 USC 5109A)

I referred to and attached the decision I cued, stated the exact regulations they broke , in some cases copied and pasted the regs and the hyperspace link or attached then instead, and told them how they had caused an altered outcome.

I also used M21-1 MR too for some of them.

If you carefully search our CUE forum I probably posted there my shortest CUE claims.

The medical evidence must have been established at time of the CUE and in VA's possession at that time.

A copy of the decision being reffered to should cover that.

But not always. I won one CUE on a disability that had no rating or percentage at all on the rating sheet but had been established, ,by medical evidence, at time of the decision.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Good answers, Pwrslm, and, as usual, Berta.  "Just the facts, maam".  

Simply show how their decision, which stated, "xxxx" (quote the decision)  violated Regulation 38 CFR   3. abc   which states, "yyyy".  (quote the regulation in conflict with your decision).  

You need to understand that CUE is a "standard of review" and has a specific "legal defination".  :  

a. It does not mean they failed in their Duty to assist.

b.  It does not mean you think you should have got 50 percent and the rater gave you 30 percent.   

Instead, CUE must be:

1.  Undebatable.

2.  The error must be "outcome determinative".  The RO decison that misspelled  "Reegional Office" is irrelevant.  

3.  Based on the laws and facts available AT THE TIME OF your alleged CUE.  

Save some time and space keeping to the criteria for CUE and dont waste your time on "non criteria" such as your opinion.  They dont care your opininion! They dont care about my opinion or Berta's either.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

CUE is used almost exclusively to try to win an EED.  Example:

You get denied for knee issue.  Many years later, the VARO awards you on knee issue.  

You appeal the effective date of the award, as you can point out theVA already admitted its service connected in the most recent decision.  Remember, VA wont dispute what VA says, they will dispute what you say.  That is why you use their words in the decision against them.    

Now, you have the task of finding an error in the early RO decision that MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR CUE STANDARD OF REVIEW.   

Not  just "any error", but an error rising to the CUE standard.  

You probably want to forget about the alleged CUE errors disputing the disability percentage, those are usually judgement calls, which dont meet CUE standard of review.    

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Broncovet is correct ..... CUE must be a clear error in interpreting the law. I won my CUE in two weeks time. It was a clear error in that they did not apply the bilateral factor which made a big change in the outcome. I kept the actual CUE claim to four pages plus copies of evidence (exhibits) supporting the error in the claim. Good luck !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

One thing few realize about CUE. If you filed in 92 and didn't appeal, the claim "died". If your reopen the same thing in 96 and lose, then take it to the BVA and lose, it's dead.   Once it has been adjudicated at the BVA, you can never disturb the 92 RO ruling. You can file CUE on the 96 appeal but not the underlying 92 decision. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use