Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Changes in Regulations, watch for "gotcha's"

Rate this question


Question

  • Lead Moderator
Posted (edited)

Watch out for the "Gotcha": Did you read the regulation as "only" applying to a "child of a Vietnam or Korea Vet"?   It isnt.  See the word "OR".  YOU (if you are receiving compensation OR pension OR DIC) should get the benefits of a "liberalizing" law, that is, a law change in the Vets favor. 

§3.114 Change of law or Department of Veterans Affairs issue.

 

(a) Effective date of award. Where pension, compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, or a monetary allowance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 18 for an individual who is a child of a Vietnam veteran or child of a veteran with covered service in Korea is awarded or increased pursuant to a liberalizing law, or a liberalizing VA issue approved by the Secretary or by the Secretary’s direction, the effective date of such award or increase shall be fixed in accordance with the facts found, but shall not be earlier than the effective date of the act or administrative issue. Where pension, compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, or a monetary allowance under 38 U.S.C. chapter 18 for an individual who is a child of a Vietnam veteran or child of a veteran with covered service in Korea is awarded or increased pursuant to a liberalizing law or VA issue which became effective on or after the date of its enactment or issuance, in order for a claimant to be eligible for a retroactive payment under the provisions of this paragraph the evidence must show that the claimant met all eligibility criteria for the liberalized benefit on the effective date of the liberalizing law or VA issue and that such eligibility existed continuously from that date to the date of claim or administrative determination of entitlement. The provisions of this paragraph are applicable to original and reopened claims as well as claims for increase.

 

(1) If a claim is reviewed on the initiative of VA within 1 year from the effective date of the law or VA issue, or at the request of a claimant received within 1 year from that date, benefits may be authorized from the effective date of the law or VA issue.   (Notice it does not say VA has to review to see if the new law gets you more benefits, its says if they do, you can get an eed) 

 

(2) If a claim is reviewed on the initiative of VA more than 1 year after the effective date of the law or VA issue, benefits may be authorized for a period of 1 year prior to the date of administrative determination of entitlement.

 

(3) If a claim is reviewed at the request of the claimant more than 1 year after the effective date of the law or VA issue, benefits may be authorized for a period of 1 year prior to the date of receipt of such request. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1805, 1815, 1821, 1832, 5110(g))

Did you catch the Gotcha??  If the VA does not initiate a request and YOU dont know about the new law, you can only get a year back pay. 

Edited by broncovet

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

The new VBM by NVLSP has arrived and that also has all updates to any VA Regulations.

If you are registered with a Lexis Nexis account you should receive it soon.

Good info Broncovet.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted

Berta, 

   Is this the 2015 VBM or the 2014?  I have the 2014 version, and I did not think the 2015 version was out yet?  

  • 0
Posted

It is the 2015 version.

They have info on the new NOD form,updated contact info for VARO directors etc, new info on inferred claims not specifically expressed by the veteran, the Vietnam Harbor AO situation,  C 123 info (AO) ,updates on the Camp Lejuene Families Act of 2012 and other stuff.

Because I had eye surgery, they aren't adjusting my reading glasses until December and I am suffering from eye fatigue- brightness of everything from cataract removal...even with sun glasses on inside so I have not read anything in detail in the new VBM yet .

I am sure their section on CUE is as good as it always was and maybe that part is updated too.

The failure of many VS0s to provide adequate representation is due, in part, in my opinion, to their reluctance to purchase and use the VBM.

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted (edited)

Yes, I agree, its a very sad situation where VSO's pay their head honchos 300k per year, but wont buy a VBM to properly advise Veterans.  It demonstrates to me that the VSO organizations are not all that interested in helping Veterans, they are much  interested in collecting big salaries for top dogs.  

Many or most of the frequent VSO mistakes are addressed by the VBM.  

Edited by broncovet
  • 0
Posted

BroncoVet,

What is pertaining to? I am a disabled Veteran child of a disabled Vietnam, combat injured, longevity retired Veteran.  Not that it makes me special in any sense of the word, and my AO/spina bifida claim is buried somewhere on the back 40.  But is this related only to that, or what?  Thanks

Andyman

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted (edited)

38 CFR 38 3.114 applies to the Effective date of benefit awards, and your retro payments when there is a "change of regulations".   It applies to ANYONE who gets benefits, not "just" children of Vietnam or Korean Vets.   The wording is confusing, but notice the "Or".   

Edited by broncovet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use