Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question 

 Click To Read Current Posts  

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Troops Getting Bad Medicine?

Rate this question


Berta

Question

The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site

VA NEWS FLASH from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 11-19-2006 #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly Page

BLOOD-CLOTTING DRUG GIVEN TO TROOPS LABELED DANGEROUS --

"It's a completely irresponsible and inappropriate use of a very, very

dangerous drug." More than 1,000 GIs have been given drug that

has caused strokes, heart attacks and death in other patients.

Is this more Pentagon "Guinea Pig" medicine?

It's time to ask a serious question here: Is the Pentagon experimenting on our troops again?

The British seem to think so. Brit veterans' groups are complaining about the use of this drug and are considering a lawsuit. That background story here... http://www.vawatchdog.org/

old%20newsflashes%20SEP%2006/newsflash09-17-2006-2.htm

Today's story here... http://www.chron.com/

disp/story.mpl/ap/health/4345323.html

Story below:

---------------

Hemophilia drug used on GIs labeled risk

The Associated Press

BALTIMORE — A blood-coagulating drug designed to treat rare forms of hemophilia is being used on critically wounded U.S. troops in Iraq despite evidence it can cause clots that lead to strokes, heart attacks and death in other patients, The (Baltimore) Sun reported for Sunday's editions.

Recombinant Activated Factor VII, which is made by Danish pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk, is approved in the United States for treating forms of hemophilia that affect fewer than 3,000 Americans. It costs $6,000 a dose.

The Food and Drug Administration said in a warning last December that giving Factor VII to patients who don't have the blood disorder could cause strokes and heart attacks. Its researchers published a study in January blaming 43 deaths on clots that developed after injections of Factor VII.

However, the Army medical command considers it a medical breakthrough that gives front-line physicians a way to control deadly bleeding. Physicians in Iraq have injected it into more than 1,000 patients, reported The Sun, which makes its first Sunday edition available Saturday afternoon.

"When it works, it's amazing," said Col. John B. Holcomb, an Army trauma surgeon and commander of the Army's Institute of Surgical Research. "It's one of the most useful new tools we have."

Critics strongly disagree.

"It's a completely irresponsible and inappropriate use of a very, very dangerous drug," said Dr. Jawed Fareed, director of the hemostasis and thrombosis research program at Loyola University in Chicago and a specialist in blood-clotting and blood-thinning medications.

Military doctors said patients requiring transfusions of 10 or more units of blood have a 25 percent to 50 percent chance of dying from their injuries, and there is enough evidence of the drug's effectiveness to continue promoting its use.

"I've seen it with my own eyes," said Air Force Lt. Col. Jeffrey Bailey, a trauma surgeon deployed this summer as senior physician at the American military hospital in Balad, Iraq. "Patients who are hemorrhaging to death, they get the drug and it stops. Factor VII saves their lives."

However, doctors at military hospitals in Germany and the United States have reported unusual and sometimes fatal blood clots in soldiers evacuated from Iraq, including unexplained strokes, heart attacks and pulmonary embolisms, or blood clots in the lungs. And some have begun to suspect Factor VII, The Sun reported.

Contacted Saturday by The Associated Press, an Army spokeswoman, Mary Ann Hodges, declined to comment immediately on the report because she had not seen it.

Doctors say determining the precise cause of blood clots is rarely possible, making it difficult to establish definitively whether Factor VII is responsible for complications. And military doctors caution against drawing any conclusions from individual cases.

Officials at Novo Nordisk said complications don't mean the drug is too dangerous to use.

"It's really not a question of an absolute safety level, but rather a ratio of benefit to risk that has to be established," said Dr. Michael Shalmi, vice president of biopharmaceuticals for Novo Nordisk.

"We're making decisions, in the middle of a war, with the best information we have available to us," said Holcomb at the Army's Institute of Surgical Research.

---------------

Larry Scott

Want more information on this and other veterans' topics?

Try the VA Watchdog dot Org Search Engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Isnt it crazy that they would be using this medicine sometimes when its not needed. I saw on there it was 6 thousand bucks a shot. WOW!!! expensive...There must be a way to test this medicine without killing people long term with blood clots, heart attacks and bad side effects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

The Brits and the US have worked together on many projects. The USS Saratoga is a US ship.

First two, are from the BBC - Brithsh Unclassified. The third one, is a picture from my cruise book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use