Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  



Active duty son trying to get some advice on how to handle my dad’s VA claim.  I appreciate any feedback and suggestions on how to proceed. 

My dad who is 78 years old is a Navy veteran of 23 years and served in Vietnam.  He was stationed on the USS Kawishiwi (AO 146), which is a Navy ship on the VA’s “brown water” list (http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/shiplist/list.asp).  My dad filed a VA Claim in 2003 for several diseases related to Agent Orange to include Type II diabetes, Heart Disease (had quadruple bypass, angioplasty, and splints done), Hypertension, various skin conditions, Gall Bladder and Liver conditions.  The documentation that VA acknowledge receiving for this claim included his VA Form 21-526, VA Form 21-4142, Copy of his DD214, VA Form 21-22, and copies of medical records from MTF (Portsmouth Naval) and various civilian doctors.   Unfortunately I don’t have a copy of the decision letter for this claim but I know he was denied the claim as these medical issues on his EBenefits “Disabilities” page have these medical issues being “Not Service Connected”

My question is shouldn’t at least some of the issues be defaulted as “Service Connected” due to Agent Orange exposure as a “brown water” veteran?  Most of the research I’ve done state that a Vietnam Veteran who have any of the diseases (http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/conditions/) and can prove that they were in Vietnam as either “boots on the ground” or “brown water” should receive VA compensation.  If this is the case why was my dad denied his claim?

So again I’m looking for advice on how to proceed. 

1.       Do I file a new VA Claim for my dad’s diseases related to Agent Orange? 

2.       If I file a new VA Claim what will the date be for his benefits?  Will it be the date of this new claim or can they revert back to the original claim date from 2003?

3.       Should I not open a new claim and try to reopen the original 2003 claim? 

Note: My dad is already receiving 40% disability for hearing loss and tinnitus.

I wish I could have been more on top of this for my dad but I haven’t lived in the same area as him for 18 years and its difficult trying to stay on top of things.  I was home visiting for Thanksgiving and spent some time going through his documents and wanted to see what I can do.  I’m now committed to working this through resolution.  My dad is a hard worker who worked 2-3 jobs most of his life to support his family.  I would love to see him get these benefits that he deserves. 


Edited by allfromvb
mispelled word

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I think you have made a mistake on the ship name. The USS Kawishiwi (AO 146)

was a fleet Oiler and likely stayed at Yankee Station. Her cruise info shows only Viet Nam west packs. There is a ship named the USS Kishwaukee (AOG-9) Operated primarily or exclusively on Vietnam's inland waterways.


I wish I could help more but unless John Rossi and Company pull a rabbit out of thin air, The probability of service connection for BWN will remain very thin.






Edited by jbasser

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

John is correct. The most recent VA AO ship's list (Nov 2015) is here:


I suggest that your dad obtain all of his military service records and his SMRs.

Veterans have succeeded in proving exposure to AO, even being exposed stateside.

I assume the denial was never appealed.

"Should I not open a new claim and try to reopen the original 2003 claim? "

The claim can be re-opened with strong New and Material Evidence, that can overcome the reasons they denied.

"My question is shouldn’t at least some of the issues be defaulted as “Service Connected” due to Agent Orange exposure as a “brown water” veteran?  Most of the research I’ve done state that a Vietnam Veteran who have any of the diseases (http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/conditions/) and can prove that they were in Vietnam as either “boots on the ground” or “brown water” should receive VA compensation. "

That is basically true.

"If this is the case why was my dad denied his claim?'"

I assume they denied because they had no proof of boots on ground or brown water.

I had a Brown water vet many years ago that they awarded AO SC  then suddenly wanted to drop his compensation.

Nothing is impossible. We worked very hard to prove them wrong with evidence, and they restored his full AO comp.

That is why I said your statement is basically true but sometimes it involves a battle.

You need to have your dad obtain his C file to see the reason they denied his claim.

Perhaps it is that maybe the wrong ship was claimed as exposed to AO and/or with 23 years of military service, his SMRs and military records could reveal he was exposed to AO elsewhere.

Our AO forum has many of those cases whereby vets proved they were exposed to AO outside of Vietnam, and had presumptive AO disabilities.

His DD 214 should reveal any decorations/awards  he got ...some might prove he served in Vietnam.

Then again he might have to send in a DD 149 (the form is available here under a search), to find out what might be missing on his DD 214.









Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


No matter what happens, you are doing a very honorable thing, to help your father with this. 

Semper Fi.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I agree because this is often very time consuming work but that is often what it takes.

This is a link to the Robert Gray Case,posted here by the attorney who represents this veteran



The case ruling has had significance to other Navy veterans thus:


In part:

"Nevertheless, an August 2012 response from the Personnel Information Exchange System (PIES) confirmed that the Veteran served "in the official waters of the Republic of Vietnam" on several occasions between 1965 and 1969, including service aboard the USS JEROME COUNTY, LST-848 (1965-1966), the USS ALUDRA, AF-55 (1968), and the USS KAWISHIWI, AO-146 (1969).  However, the PIES response indicated that there was no conclusive proof that the Veteran had "in-country service."  While there is indication that the ships on which the Veteran served were stationed in harbors and locations off the Vietnamese coastline, there is no official documentation that these vessels docked during the Veteran's service."  

In another Recent BVA decision, the Gray case is mentioned again


What this means is that the Remands call for the VA to look further into other ships the veterans had been on.

You need to see all of your father's military records and even try to obtain deck logs because the BVA, in the above recent decision, with a finding that the USS Kawishiwi had docked in Vietnam,suggests to me that this potential evidence of docking ,if proven,  would not only help prove this BVA vet's  case but it would help get this ship onto the VA's AO ship's list.

I would think your dad might well have been on other ships as well, some which could be on the recent AO list now.

The brown water vet I mentioned above...that took a lot of research as well as countless phone calls I had with him,

in those days when I could spend that type of time on the phone and doing research.

One day we had discussed the legal vocabulary of the regulations at length ( which also became part of his appeal but he requested a hearing too) and then we ended the call with just BSing about Vietnam.Suddenly he remembered a incident he had never mentioned to me before.I asked him to repeat what he just said in as much detail as possible.....

BINGO....regardless of the evidence we already had, he revealed the exact nexus he needed!

He immediately set to work again and found documented  proof of what he told me....it think it was in the ship's logs and he also

found a buddy for a buddy statement to confirm it, and sent that evidence to his VARO ASAP.

The VA cancelled the hearing and dropped their proposed reduction of his AO comp.

My long point here is your dad and you need to converse as much as possible on when and where he served and the complete military records he obtains will jog his memory.

AO was in Korea, Thailand, CONUS, Guam, Okinawa, etc etc and vets have proven that fact.

James Cripps, the first CONUS vet, (a member of hadit) and Kurt Pressman, the first Thailand AO vet, a member here as well,

did the leg work and through their victories they helped many others. Nothing is impossible.

Personally I would not depend on VA to clearly follow any remand (as within the above cases) or attempt to obtain what many remands call for.

I feel the veteran  should be proactive in doing that themselves.






Edited by Berta
  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Check out John Hill Attorney H&P Veterans Attorneys 

Interesting read.

 I had heard through the grapevine  that if any soldier from any Branch of service set one boot on the ground in the RVN is eligible for AO benefits if he can prove it.




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Yes 

      After a PTSD/Unspecific MDD Diagnose From the VA Dr's

      The gold standard for diagnosing PTSD is a structured clinical interview such as the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5). When necessary, the PCL-5 can be scored to provide a provisional PTSD DSM 5 diagnosis.

      Any clinical clinician such as MD ,Psychiatrist even a L.C.S.W. (Certified)can perform the Diagnostics Evaluation Employed by the the VA

      ...They just need to figure out your symptoms and put together a list of your symptom's that you possess or show from the evaluation...I am not 100% Sure just how they do this ?

      being I am not a Dr or clinical clinician 

      Once a Diagnoses of PTSD is given they try to set you up with a Therapist to help with your New dx And how to adjust or cope with the Anxiety and Depression the PTSD can cause.

        you learn the tools to cope with and depending how severe your symptoms are ? 

       They test /screen you with phychoeducational type therapy treatment usually at first.

       Warning  some of this therapy can be very rough on a Veteran  from holding on to guilt  from the trauma its self or you maybe in a  ''stuck point''from memories and guilt or from the stressor's or anything that reminds you of the trauma you endured.

      The therapy works  even if we think it don't,  I recommend Therapy for all PTSD Veterans  it could very well save your life once the correct therapy is in place and the Veteran makes all his Clinical Appointments.

      I still have Combat PTSD it probably will never be cured completely but we can learn the tools it takes to cope with this horrible diseases 

      even learning breathing techniques  Helps tremendously during a panic attact.

      I have guilt from the war in Vietnam  ( I ask my self what could I have done to make a better outcome/difference?..and also I am in what the therapist calls stuck points. working on that at present once a week for 90 minutes.  I am very fortunate to have the help the VA gives me and I am lucky I have not turned to alcohol or drugs to mask my problem.

      But I have put my family through a living hell with my angers of burst.and they all stood by me the whole time years and years of my family life was disrupted because of me and my children &spouse  never deserved it one bit.

      That's all I want to say about that.

      At least I am still around. and plan to be tell my old age dying day.
    • No timeframe gotta love that answer it’s even better when you ask 1800 people or call the board directly they’ll say you’ll know sooner then later. I had mine advanced and it was about 2 months later until I had the decision in my hand which seems forever but in the present system in 2016 lightning fast...
        • Thanks
    • I am serviced connected for ankylosing spondylitis back in 1985. I had a C&P exam on 7-7-19 since I am asking for an increase in my cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral ratings. After speaking with the DAV to find out progress and info on my exam, the Rep. noted sort of what I expected. Radiculopathy was noted and ROM was 0-15 for cervical, and 0-25 for back. I am currently rated as Cervical 30%, Thoracic 10%, and Lumbosacral 40%. The main question that I have is relating to the thoracic 10% and lumbosacral 40%. I am confused on these two. Is Lumbosacral separate from the thoracic/others ? Since my back ROM is at 0-25, does this mean that my thoracic might increase from the 10% to a higher rating ? I am confused how they break down my ratings from cervical at 30%, Thoracic at 10%, and Lumbosacral at 40%. Also, with the radiculopathy, is this something that they will rate also ? I am currently at 90% total combined for all my disabilities. I hope this helps for someone to give me advice/answers.
      • 4 replies
    • Thank you @GeekySquid for your reply. 


      I have redacted personal information for my documents listed below. 

      I look forward to your reply. 

      HEADACHE STR 2006 copy_Redacted.pdf


      Pages from Original Denial-Grant Reasons_Redacted.pdf
    • Hello Defenders of freedom!

      I have a question pertaining to this denial for headaches. The decision letter is quoted below. 


      3. Service connection for headaches.

      "We may grant service connection for a disability which began in military service or was caused by some event or experience in service.

      Your STRs are negative for any treatment of or diagnosis of headaches. On your post-deployment exam in 2005 you denied any headaches. On separation, you denied any headaches. VA treatment records are negative for any treatment of or diagnosis of headaches. On VA exam, the examiner stated there was no evidence of any residuals of a traumatic brain injury.

      We have denied service connection for headaches because the evidence of record fails to show this disability was incurred in or caused by military service."

      From my understanding these 3 points must be overturned to successfully win a CUE case:

       (1) either the correct facts, as they were known at the time, were not before the adjudicator or the statutory or regulatory provisions in existence at that time were incorrectly applied; 

      (2) the error must be undebatable and of the sort which, had it not been made, would have manifestly changed the outcome at the time of the prior determination

      and (3) a determination that there was CUE must be based on the record and law that existed at the time of the prior adjudication in question.  

      @Berta, or veterans out here who have knowledge/experience, tell me what facts you think would be needed to prove this denial for headaches was an error? 
      • 14 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines