Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

VA Disability Claims Articles

Ask Your VA Claims Question | Current Forum Posts Search | Rules | View All Forums
VA Disability Articles | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users

  • hohomepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • 27-year-anniversary-leaderboard.png

    advice-disclaimer.jpg

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Sleep apnea secondary to TBI

Rate this question


Carlos daniel

Question

Hello everyone. I'm new to this forum and had a question in regards to getting compensation for sleep apnea. I know hey are making it harder for vets to get compensation for sleep apnea these days. I finally have my C&P exam tomorrow. I was told some time ago that it may be hard for me to get compensation for OSA because I didn't get diagnosed with it until after I separated from the military. I separated in 2008 and when I finally had my first physical from the VA in 2009 the physician recommended that I have a sleep study completed. I have been using a CPAP since 2009. I have no idea why I did not submit my claim after being diagnosed. I suppose it was because I was content with the current compensation that I was receiving. I was told from a friend that works at the VA that I have a better chance of getting compensation for sleep apnea by claiming it as a secondary to my TBI. My current percentage for TBI is 70%. Any advice would be appreciated. Will keep posted with results.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Sleep apnea is one tough cookie to get connected if you were not diagnosed in service. I have tried to connect it secondary to PTSD and was denied even after I went for an IMO with a favorable C&P filled out. The darn C&P they sent me to resulted in the doc saying its due to weight gain. Now I am in the process of proving them wrong. The biggest thing I can say in your case is you have to get a doctor that specializes in that field to agree with you and provide written solid medical rationale as to why your OSA is linked to your already service connected TBI. Give the doc something to work with. Tell him that you dont get out of the house because of your TBI. Do the medicines the VA has prescribed cause weight gain, you could link it to that. There are several things that OSA can be linked to but its not likely that a VA c&p doc will link it at a C&P. I recommend going outside and getting a doc to write up the C&P for you. How did your exam go? Favorable I hope...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

With episodes of Central Apneas, C02 builds up in the blood and the Brain doesn't signal the need to breath. Like when you're awake and intentionally hold your breath as long as possible, the old brain signals you to breath immediately due to the C02 buildup.

I can't recall seeing any explicit CSA Claims discussions on Hadit, generally, they've all been OSA or a combination of OSA & CSA which is classified as MSA (Mixed SA).

Do you have a copy of your Overnight Sleep Study? How about posting a redacted copy, along with the Sleep Dr's complete DX and RX? Are you on supplemental 02 attached to your Cpapor Bipap?

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I  totally agree with Gastone,  & if you have a C-PAP Machine or Bi-Pap use it, & get use to using it keep it clean and disinfected & use it every night...for your own good buddy ...worry bout your claim later.

I understand if VA uses the Choice Card and sends veteran to a private sleep study   We can't get  copy of the sleep study...I' had a Choice Card private study (Nice place) but I could never get a copy of the sleep study..I tested postive for Sleep Apnea and VA sleep clinic got me a C-PAP to use  I've had it now 2 YEARS,

If you been Diagnose with OSA/or MSA Mixed /Sleep Disorders= Use that C-PAP Machine.

I agree & don't use the OSA & Don't use the word ''caused by'' ask the Doc to use ''Related To''

Sleep Apnea is  KILLER waiting to Happen.

Edited by Buck52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Citation Nr: 1616188	
Decision Date: 04/22/16    Archive Date: 05/04/16

DOCKET NO.  15-02 781

On appeal from the
Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in San Diego, California


THE ISSUE

Entitlement to service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, to include as secondary to the service-connected disabilities.


REPRESENTATION

Veteran represented by:	Daniel Smith, Attorney at Law


ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

R. R. Watkins, Associate Counsel


INTRODUCTION

The Veteran served on active duty in the U.S. Navy from July 1987 to December 1990. 

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an April 2014 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO).  

This appeal was processed using the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) paperless claims processing system.  There is also a paperless, electronic record in the Virtual VA system.  


FINDING OF FACT

The Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea is shown to be etiologically related to the service-connected disabilities.


CONCLUSION OF LAW

Obstructive sleep apnea is proximately due to the service-connected disabilities.  38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.310 (2015).


REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

As the Board is granting the Veteran's claim in full, no discussion of the VA's duties to notify and assist is necessary, as any defect is not prejudicial to the Veteran.

In order to prevail under a theory of secondary service connection, there must be: (1) evidence of a current disorder; (2) evidence of a service-connected disability; and, (3) medical nexus evidence establishing a connection between the service-connected disability and the current disorder.  See Wallin v. West, 11 Vet. App. 509, 512 (1998).

In addition, the regulations provide that service connection is warranted for a disorder that is aggravated by, proximately due to, or the result of a service-connected disease or injury.  38 C.F.R. § 3.310.  Any additional impairment of earning capacity resulting from an already service-connected disability, regardless of whether or not the additional impairment is itself a separate disease or injury caused by the service-connected disability, should also be compensated.  Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995).  When service connection is thus established for a secondary disorder, the secondary disorder shall be considered a part of the original disability.  Id.

The Board notes that 38 C.F.R. § 3.310 was amended, effective October 10, 2006.  Under the revised § 3.310(b) (the existing provision at 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(b) was moved to sub-section (c)), any increase in severity of a non-service-connected disease or injury proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury, and not due to the natural progress of the disease, will be service-connected.  In reaching this determination as to aggravation of a non-service-connected disorder, consideration is required as to what the competent evidence establishes as the baseline level of severity of the nonservice-connected disease or injury (prior to the onset of aggravation by service-connected disability), in comparison to the medical evidence establishing the current level of severity of the non-service-connected disease or injury.  These findings as to baseline and current levels of severity are to be based upon application of the corresponding criteria under the Schedule for Rating Disabilities (38 C.F.R. part 4) for evaluating that particular non-service-connected disorder.  See 71 Fed. Reg. 52,744-47 (Sept. 7, 2006).

The determination as to whether the requirements for service connection are met is based on an analysis of all the evidence of record and the evaluation of its credibility and probative value.  38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2014); Baldwin v. West, 13 Vet. App. 1 (1999); see 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a). 

When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding a material issue, the benefit of the doubt in resolving each such issue shall be given to the claimant.  38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b); Ortiz v. Principi, 274 F.3d 1361, 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2001); see 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102.  If the Board determines that the preponderance of the evidence is against the claim, it has necessarily found that the evidence is not in approximate balance, and the benefit of the doubt rule is not applicable.  Ortiz, 274 F.3d at 1365.

In a February 2016 brief, the Veteran's attorney asserted that the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea was caused by his service-connected disabilities, including traumatic brain injury (TBI) with primary insomnia and a deviated nasal septum status post septoplasty.

The only matter at issue is whether there is a nexus between the Veteran's currently diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea and his service-connected disabilities.

In July 2014, Dr. G.H. completed a Sleep Apnea Disability Benefits Questionnaire (DBQ).  Dr. G.H. confirmed the Veteran's diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.  He opined that it was more likely than not that the obstructive sleep apnea was caused by the service-connected TBI. 

In November 2014 VA obtained a medical opinion to determine the etiology of the Veteran's sleep apnea.  After reviewing the record, the VA examiner opined that it was less likely than not that the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea was proximately due to or the result of a TBI.  She elaborated that sleep apnea is a condition of the upper airway and throat not of the brain.  TBI causes damage to the brain rather than the upper airway and throat.

In January 2016, A.C., a private registered nurse, provided an opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea and his service-connected disabilities.  A.C. reviewed the Veteran's claim file before offering her opinion.  After discussing, the relevant medical literature and evidence, she opined that it was likely that the service-connected deviated legal septum contributed to obstructive sleep apnea.  She elaborated that the nose accounts for more than 50 percent of the total resistance of the upper airway.  Although the Veteran underwent a septoplasty for his deviated septum in 1997, nasal bone imaging studies from July 2012 and December 2012 demonstrated continued nasoseptal deviation to the right.  The irregular shape of the nasal septum could partially block the passage of air and interfere with breathing.  She added that it was at least as likely as not that the service-connected TBI contributed to the onset of the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea.  In support of her opinion, she cited a variety of studies that showed TBI is a risk factor for the development of obstructive sleep apnea.

The Board finds that the private positive nexus opinions are the most probative opinions of record.  A.C.'s opinion, in particular, was based upon an extensive review of the record and a detailed discussion of relevant medical literature.  The November 2014 VA examiner's opinion is inadequate as it does not address the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and the service-connected deviated nasal septum or consider relevant studies.  The November 2014 VA opinion also fails to address whether the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea was aggravated beyond its natural progression by the service-connected disabilities.

The weight of the evidence demonstrates that the Veteran has obstructive sleep apnea that was caused by his service-connected disabilities.  Therefore, service connection for obstructive sleep apnea is granted on a secondary basis.


ORDER

Service connection for sleep apnea secondary to the service-connected disabilities is granted.



____________________________________________
GAYLE E. STROMMEN
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use