Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need advice to denied Sleep Apnea claim

Rate this question


Wayne TX

Question

Would like some opinions.......I have sleep apnea and restless legs....two sleep studies done at VAMC.......been on a CPAP since early December.......I am already SC for both allergic rhinitis w/Polyps and Sinus......would either of these or both be strong enough secondaries to get Sleep Apnea SC approved?  I have nothing in my service records for sleep disorder or sleep complaints.  I was told I was a loud snorer but I didn't think much of that.  I do have a history of allergies and sinus surgery all during my military service and a lot in VA File.  I got denied on Sleep Apnea claim in January 2016.  I got an IMO done in May 2015. but Dr. went with Obesity opinion (which I qualified as well, 40 pound weight gain) instead...........he did not use allergy and sinus SC as secondaries. He could of gone with the rhinitis but didn't...........sinus did not get approved until January 2016. Also, I was not on a CPAP yet when I filed the initial claim....all I could supply was two sleep studies results showing I had moderate apnea.  I was not issued a CPAP until December of 2015, and got my denial in January 2016.  I need to file a NOD now so looking for some advice in going this route. Thanks

 

Edited by Wayne TX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 It's Quite hard to get  SC for  OSA/S.A.

 you need a document from prior military service of some type of OSA or S.A., However it can be proved why you have OSA today from other prior military S.C.disabilities.

Do you have a SC Rating with VA For PTSD??

If so it can be connected to OSA from taking medications for PTSD  this would be a secondary to filing a claim for OSA.

 you need a VA OSA Diagnose and on cpap machine.& a nexus from the Dr that order your SA Study and reason.

Here is a link from VA Watchdog about OSA. & Getting it S.C.

https://www.vawatchdog.org/obstructive-sleep-apnea-osa.html

Maybe this will be of some help

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I would not let Obesity get in the way...to many normal weight people have S.A.  

So when a Dr tells you to lose weight and you won't have S.A ask him can he guarantee that?

sure we all would love to have our dream weight but hey we live our lives like we see fit   right!

jmo

....................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

to add to what Buck said-   current weight gain of 40 lbs since when?

Assuming you were within weight standards when active duty, can you ID a cause for the weight gain-  injury (that is SC)causing no PT, causing weight gain?  if so I'd say the SA would be secondary to injury which caused the weight gain and is the cause for the SA.

Just a thought.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

It is tough, but treat sleep apnea like most other claims, but don't overlook secondaries.  

I keep saying this, but you need 3 things to service connect most anything (except secondaries):

1.  Current diagnosis

2.  In service event or aggravation.

3. Nexus or link between the two (doc's stmt that says your sleep apnea is at least as likely as not due to xx event in military service.

With a secondary, you dont need an in service event, you already have that with the primary.  You just need a current diagnosis and a strong IMO/IME to a service connected condition.

My advice is to get your C file, go over it.  YOu may be suprised you already have a nexus to secondary conditions (I was).  The VA did not like that, and ordered a C and P exam anyway, from one of their denial puppets who had no experience in sleep medicine.  

You can go to Chris Attigs website who has great information on sleep apnea.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Broncovet,

Yes, plug that Attig SA info!  Good info there.  I really ought to heed your advice on that one myself. 

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use