Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bladder Cancer, Hyperthyroidism, Parkinson Disease or Symptoms Associated to Agent Orange but IOM downgrades Spina Bifida

Rate this question


Jumpmaster

Question

Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides—Tenth Biennial Update

The Agent Orange Act of 1991, extended by Public Law 107-103, direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to contract with the NAS to conduct a comprehensive review of scientific and medical literature on health effects from exposure to Agent Orange, and to conduct biennial updates. The statute directs each new NAS committee to determine, to the extent that scientific data permit, meaningful determinations: See more at:  

http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/Activities/Veterans/HealthEffectsVietnamVeteransHerbicides.aspx

Download the PDFs:  It may help veterans diagnosed with presumptive Bladder Cancer, Hyperthyroidism and Parkinson Disease or Parkinsonism (Parkinson-like-Symptoms) denied SC years earlier for association with Agent Orange.  Especially, for numerous veterans that served Outside of Vietnam and denied disability based on inadequate herbicide associated Agent Orange direct exposure evidence. Don’t forget that the VA and DOD withholds the essential medical or scientific facts, from veterans that proves your Outside of Vietnam herbicide exposure.  It’s up to everyone to dig up the hidden exposure facts that prove your own herbicide exposure during service.  Keep fighting for SC and never, ever, give up, and Whenever, the VA denies your claim.  Relax, Breathe, then lock and load, aim accurately at your herbicide exposure target, breathe again, and rapid fire away down the VA RANGE --with armor-piercing VA NOD and Appeals evidence that results in service connection. 

http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=21845#

Additional major findings in the 1,000-plus page report, released March 10, 2016, included Parkinsonism and Parkinson’s-like symptoms and spina bifida.

IOM announced bladder cancer and hypothyroidism were upgraded to “limited or suggestive evidence” of a link between the diseases and exposure to Agent Orange. This was a change from the Update 2012 category of “inadequate or insufficient.”

IOM also added “Parkinsonism” and “Parkinson’s-like symptoms” to the list for “limited or suggestive evidence” of an association.  In the report, the IOM Committee noted that, “…there is no rational basis for an exclusion of those with Parkinson-like symptoms from the service-related category denoted as Parkinson disease.  To exclude a claim for a condition with Parkinson-like symptoms, the onus should be on VA on a case-by-case basis to definitively establish the role of a recognized etiologic factor other than the herbicides sprayed in Vietnam.”  Parkinson’s disease was added to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ presumptive service connection list on August 31, 2010.

In a rare move, the IOM downgraded spina bifida to “inadequate or insufficient evidence to determine an association.”  The birth defect has been in the “limited or suggestive” category of association for children of all Vietnam Veterans since Update 1996. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thanks for this info....that is a big change on bladder cancer and hypothyroidism.

It will be interesting to see what VA does with these findings and how fast they will move on [the regulations.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Folks,

I've reviewed the report in entirety. Significant for VA consideration from my humble perspective --- and it the past has taken 6-9 months for proposed regulatory response: (1) will be the reiteration of limited or suggestive association for hypertension/stroke, 810ish-850ish (this was recommended in the 2012 Report for which the VA did not make any regulatory changes).  Page 15 notes the IOM was "disappointed" that pending cohort studies were not yet available for consideration; (2) recommendation for limited or suggestive association for bladder cancer, p 516-540ish; (3)  clarification of Parkinson's-like symptoms, p 743; and (4) recommendation for limited or suggestive association for hypothyroidism, ps 841-860ish. 

I'll also note the IOM again addressed issues pertaining to non-cancerous respiratory conditions (COPD, etc..), pg 870s, maintained inadequate or insufficient but noted there disappointment that the long-term cohort study regarding COPD was not yet available for consideration (PG 15).  The expected study was also mentioned in the 2012 Agent Orange Report.

Seth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use