Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How is back pay figured

Rate this question


jgrod

Question

I'm received compensation (70% for PTSD since 2011). I had an appeal for back condition that was just awarded (March 2016) 20% DDD and 10% secondary radiculopathy Lle effective date March 2013. 

My question: do I get back pay at 30% for new SC or just 10% (the difference between 70 and 80%) 80% is the new combined rate?

Also, I had been fighting my back condition since my discharge in 1993. I filled within a year of discharge but finally got the SC. Can I get effective date to my date of discharge? If so, how?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Edited by jgrod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Good questions!  

1.  You get the "difference" between what they paid you before, and what your new rating is.  You have to figure it out each month, as the comp changes, and you get the "older" rate in years past.  

2.  Yes.  You should get an effective date the day after discharge if you filed within a year of discharge.  If you did not, then you can file a NOD.  Caveat:  You get the later of "the date you applied" or "facts found", which means the date the doc said you were disabled.  Example:

You get out of the service in April 2002.  In August 2002, you apply for "bad knees".  

IN July, 2014, the doc does an xray and says you need new knees and schedules surgery, AND the doctor opinies that your knees caused you no problems at all from 2002-2014, but in July, 2014, you need new knees.  Lets further assume VA has SC'd your knee problems.  

What is effective date?  Its the later of the facts found or the date you applied.  The doc said your knees were fine until July 2014, so your effective date is July 2014 for 30%, but 0% from August, 2002 because, while your knee problems were service connected, you had no symptoms (according to your doc) from 2002-July 2014.  So the "facts found" are you get SC at 30 % from August 2014, not 2002.  

To refute this docs opinion, you could get a private doctor review your records and show you had constant knee issues from 2002 through 2014.  

  

This is for example only, and not any person, just a hypothetical case.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The c&p doc wrote, "it is directly related to his time on active duty starting in 1991 when the SMR mention the back pain radiating into the left leg. This was only made worse by the fall on the Navy Ship. Records over the years show a consistent history of lumbar pain and always into the left leg. This makes this condition at least as likely as not related to his time in service."

Also stated that my sciatic nerve is "incomplete paralysis - moderately severe." What is the reading for that? Is it 10% because that's what I got. I'll get letter and post what was awarded.

Thanks for the help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use