Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sleep Apnea added to schedular?

Rate this question


Steve G.

Question

Can someone tell me when sleep apnea was added to the schedular? Although I'm convinced I most likely had it when I was still active, I don't think anyone had heard of in 1991 so was never diagnosed. I was just turned down for a separate rating for high blood pressure (a separate issue for another topic soon) because the separate rating was added in 1998 after my time in service. This led me to wonder if this affects sleep apnea claims. FTR, I was diagnosed w/ SA several years ago and never bothered to try to claim it due the length of time and the VA's such helpful attitude. The VA did cover my CPAP machine, so they do help some. 

Thanks for the help - 

Steve G.

USAF Msgt, retired 1991

Currently rated at 70%

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Im not sure what you mean by "sleep apnea added to the schedular"?  

If you mean when did VA begin compensation for sleep apnea with CPAP, well I looked and the most recent update was in 2006, but that does not mean they first started in 2006.  

You can still apply for compensation for sleep apnea in at least 2 ways:

1.  You can still try to get "direct" SC due to service. If you have documentation that you had sleep apnea symptoms, such as loud snoring, give it a shot.  Chris Attig, the attorney has a whole booklet on sleep apnea  and he may/may not be able to help you.  

2.  You can also (more likely) get sleep apnea secondary to a service connected condition.  There is significant evidence linking sleep apnea to depression and PTSD, for example, but that is not the only way.  Its possible its secondary to nasal/sinus conditions but you would likely have to have physican documentation regardless.  

 

I would not "shy away" even if there was no such thing as sleep apnea diagnosis in 1991.  Here is ONE good reason.  Alex Graham (aka Ask NOD) noted that he and or friends had been denied SC for hep c because "the record was silent for any treatment for Hep C".  Well no, there was no treatment or even diagnois of hep c in the 1970's Vietnam war.  They did not even have a name for it!  I think it was first called "Non  A non B" hepatitus, but they probably did not have a test for it back then either!.  That does not mean you have not been infected with the hep c virus...no!  Just because medical science had not figured it out yet, that does not mean that those hep c bugs swimming around in your liver did not do any damage.    In other words, medical science's inability to test for or treat Hep C in the 1970's does not mean you could not have gotten infected with the virus back then, especially if you were injected with a jet gun, got a blood transfusion, or many other transmission means, such as handling infected blood, such as a medic in war time.  

Ditto for sleep apnea.  Just because we did not figure that out back then, does not mean that sleep apnea wont do its damage or that you did not have it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You either do or don't not have, verifiable SA symptoms in your SMR's. Maybe Buddy Statements as to symptoms? "I'm convinced I most likely had it," won't cut it.

Direct SA Awards, without SMRs, is just about impossible. As a Secondary Issue, a much better chance. Which of your current SC's was DX'd prior to your SA DX? A breakdown of your current SC's would be helpful.

Check SA Medical Literature, usually about 11 or so Listed possible causes of OSA. How many do you have? Has your SA Specialist opined in his Clinician Notes, as to a possible etiology? Were you considered Obese and have a 17+ in neck when you retired? How much has your BMI increased, from 91?

Start an FDC on E-Ben to establish your file date, just don't hit the Submit Button. Then, get busy on your supporting evidence for a Direct or Secondary SC.

Semper Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I just checked out the Mayo Clinics causes of OSA.

1. excess weight

2. neck circumference

3. narrowed airway

4. being male

5. being older

6. family history

7. use of alcohol, sedatives, and tranquilizers

8. smoking

9.nasal congestion

Edited by Fat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

They have been saying they were going to adjust it in 2016 during an edit of the Reg since at least around 2013, I believe.  Rumors were down to 30%, but who knows if that was legit or just hypothesizing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the info.

I was recently turned down on CUE request because the req to rate HPB separately happened a couple of years after my initial rating and all my HPB readings from that point on were normal. Apparently my in-service readings no longer counted (I'm working on that separately)..

Although I have been currently diagnosed with Sleep Apnea, and am under treatment (CPAP, provided by the VA). everything I've seen is that you have to prove you
either were diagnosed or had several of the symptoms prior to separation. The only thing I've got is a medical history of Heart disease, a couple of pictures of me with a fat neck, my uniform shirt from my separation, size 19, worn with a neck stretcher, a  vague recollections of being told I snored a lot during overnight exercises and training.

I'd like to try to claim it but I think it will take some real creative writing on the part of my current Doc's and a bit of luck.

Thanks again for the help and suggestions, still working on several issues.

Steve G.
MSGT, USAF Ret

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use