Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Strange NOD acknowledgement, Outdated Right to paid Attorney info

Rate this question


GuaymasJim

Question

I received a letter dated February 19, 2016 informing me that my NOD had been received.  Included with the letter was a generic “Appeal Process Election” form which they want me to fill out and return within 60 days.  This seems odd since the new NOD VA FORM 21-0958, which I used, asks that very same question in Part III Sec. 9 entitled: “Appeal Process Election.”  My election of Traditional Appellate Review Process was clearly marked. 

Also, there is a third option on this attached “Appeal Process Election” form which does not appear on the VA FORM 21-0958:  “[] I have reconsidered and wish to withdraw my appeal.”  This just seems like another crude attempt at getting veterans to abandon their appeals.

The letter also included this statement verbatim:

 

“An agent or attorney may also represent you.  However, an agent or attorney can charge you only for service performed on or after the date of a final decision by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

It has been my understanding that since June 20, 2007, a veteran can be represented by a paid attorney anytime after filing a NOD an initial RO denial.

Has my RO gone completely off the rails or is this the way it is done now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Huh!? GuaymasJim, I have absolutely no idea what they are talking about on the attorney issue. To my knowledge nothing has changed, absolutely we are allowed to have attorneys represent us at RO and BVA levels. May I ask which RO your claims are being worked at, one of the elders will probably comment as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I got the same letter.  It is for you to let them know if you want the DRO Review Process, or Traditional Appeal Process.  I elected DRO because it is normally faster.  However, if the DRO process does not turn out in your favor, you can still continue to the BVA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

But of course!   Never you mind that the Veteran elected the traditional appeal in the applicable NOD form.  

There is still a chance the VEteran may have forgotten he did so, and this gives VA still another "glitch" opportunity so that VA can delay the claim some more.  The VA's motto is never delay a claim until next month when you may have an opportunity to delay it much longer.  

The fact that you already made this election is irrelevant, as there is still "one more chance" that the VA can still figure out how to delay your claim longer.  

If you were a VA employee (executive) you could type this up, submit it, and explain how you have single handedly save VA lots of money and collect a bonus, just like the VA employees who figured out the "secret lists" which led to Veteran deaths.  Remember, some of these Vet deaths may have been receiving benefits, so look at all the money VA will save for parties, by a premature Veteran death.  Its what they do.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

flores97,  thought so too, but how can I believe my lying eyes?

DD12,  did you submit your NOD on NOD VA FORM 21-0958 or was it written out?  As stated the form has the exact same first two options but also a third option to abandon your appeal.  The NOD form doesn't have that third option.

bronco, my thoughts exactly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use