Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Now what?

Rate this question


Scout Swimmer

Question

03-19-16

Granted 30% asthma according to AB8 letter. (From 06-03-2011)

03-20-16. Received SOC regarding headaches. 

03-21-16 Submittef rebuttal to SOC and fired VSO. (Did not follow remand instructions/failed to consider nexus for migranies related to service connected asthma, rhinitis, nasal blockage, deviated septum never addressed).  

Have not received official rating yet. Also did not receive retro payment or new monthly adjustment for April. 

Damn VA. Real good at sending BS denials. Not so good at getting Veterans their entitlements when proven wrong. 

0311

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Your thread is all over the place.  What exactly are you asking us???

 

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

ScoutSwimmer, did you notice in the evidence section (for SOC on migraines), what evidence was considered? I think I remember you saying you had IMOs done by Dr Bash, were they listed as evidence? If you could redact personal info and post a copy of the SOC, we should be able to suggest some options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm sorry if I am all over the place with this. I'm just really frustrated with these people. Its actually really simple and I do have a handle on it. The issues on remand where asthma, migraines, deviated septum, chronic rhinitis, nasal blockage. Case is on remand, C&P's were completed for Asthma and migraines (other breathing issues were not even addressed, which were in the BVA remand as well).

Asthma granted at 30% over a month according to AB8 (still no retro or packet)

Migraines denied (They only considered it as direct connect which is ridiculous because Bash and the first C&P DOC said they were a result of the Asthma that is now connected)

Got a letter yesterday saying my Veteran Advocate (John Dorle is not accredited so American Legion is still my POA. Again, ridiculous since he is listed on the VA database is accredited.  

I really don't have any questions at this point. (Except maybe a timeframe to retro and the official decision for the asthma) ) I'm certain time will sort things out. I am just really frustrated with this 5 year appeal and these VA people. I don't know if they are incompetent or doing this stuff intentionally but I just wish it was over.  

Again, sorry for the confusion. I use this place to vent out my frustration. It helps.

Edited by Scout Swimmer

0311

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

ScoutSwimmer, you have nothing to apologize for. We all need to vent sometimes!! When you do receive your statement of case(or award letter for asthma), BE SURE to look at the evidence reviewed section. It would also of course help to redact personal info and upload a copy here on hadit.I reread your post and realized you did receive an SOC for the migraines. Can you post a copy, look over the evidence page very carefully, if ANY of your IMOs, other impotant evidence is not listed, resubmit that evidence asap with a statement detailing that the important evidence was not considered. That is a violation of one of the regs, hopefully one of the elders will comment also, let me look up which one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks Flores. 

The good news is we finally received the official rating today. I'm not very computer savvy but I wish I could post it because it's actually a bit funny. They offered no medical or legal explanation of why they ended up granting the service connection. Almost as if they just shrugged their shoulders and gave up. 

No retro yet but it looks like they got the timeline correct at least so that's good.

Thanks for understanding. . 

0311

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use