Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Copies of C&P Exam Results Must Now Be Requested from Your RO?

Rate this question


lotzaspotz

Question

This is interesting and unfortunate, if true.  My husband had another C&P exam yesterday. It was at a VA office in town dedicated to these exams, but not at the VAMC.  While it was going on and I was waiting in the lobby, I asked the receptionist for the form to complete to get a copy of it, as I've always done.  She replied, and the examiner later concurred when I asked him the same thing, that the VA nationwide has implemented a new policy.  Copies of exam results must now be requested directly from the RO, and will not be available until after a claim is decided.  VAMC's will no longer provide copies to veterans.  You can guess what's going to happen (or more likely, not happen) if veterans have to jump through this brand new hoop to get medical information that rightfully belongs to them in reference to their claims and appeals.

Has anyone else heard this?  I'm wondering how the HIPAA laws impact this.  Our Congressman is also an M.D., and I'm ready to contact him, but I'd first like to get my facts straight.  I asked about accessing the information on ebenefits, but they told me to expect a change in that, but they didn't know how that was all going to shake out.  

 

Edited by lotzaspotz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

They apparently feel Like the vets are getting to much information and catching errors that screw up their indecision process!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

From what I have learned over the past 6 years, that is the way it has always been, just the policy hasn't been enforced at most RO's.  The C&P exam is technically part of your claim, not health records, so technically we shouldn't be able to see the results until the claim is completed.  I know that sucks, cause it's nice to get an idea of what the doctor actually is reporting.  We have to remember that the C&P doctors are not part of the VAMC, they are part of the RO.  I have all my claims done through the Boise RO here in Idaho and I have always been able to see my C&P's a few days later.  But I have heard of others stating what you said a couple years ago.  

100% P&T Schedular !!

50%  Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea, 40%  Fibromyalgia (GW presumptive), 30%  Right shoulder issues (Labral Tear surgery, arthritis, surgery post motor vehicle accident), 30%  Somatic Symptom Disorder (claimed as depression and anxiety), 30% Onychomycosis (nail fungus) right great toe, 30% IBS with diarrhea (GW presumptive), 10%  Hypertension, 10%  Hypothyroidism, 10%  Tinnitus, 10%  Right knee issues (meniscus surgery, arthritis),   0%  Right shoulder surgical scars,  0%  Right knee surgical scars,  0%  Erectile Dysfunction, 0%  Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism, SMC-K  Loss of Use of Creative Organ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
11 minutes ago, Okichewy1 said:

From what I have learned over the past 6 years, that is the way it has always been, just the policy hasn't been enforced at most RO's.  The C&P exam is technically part of your claim, not health records, so technically we shouldn't be able to see the results until the claim is completed.  I know that sucks, cause it's nice to get an idea of what the doctor actually is reporting.  We have to remember that the C&P doctors are not part of the VAMC, they are part of the RO.  I have all my claims done through the Boise RO here in Idaho and I have always been able to see my C&P's a few days later.  But I have heard of others stating what you said a couple years ago.  

its always been the policy of the vba. the exam is not part of the vha. its just been throughout the years, some regional offices adhered to the policy and others didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, wingnut73 said:

They apparently feel Like the vets are getting to much information and catching errors that screw up their indecision process!

when my clinic still did the exams, veterans would call the ortho doctor and bitch about their report even before the claim was adjudicated. he got pissed and i can't say i blamed him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Yep.   Always remember this, tho. 

"The left hand of VA does not know what the right hand is doing".  

Try the "teenager" method.  First, always try sugar.  It works better than vinegar.  Be nice, and ask.  But, when that fails:    

If Employee A (Mom) says no, ask employee B (Dad).  

If Employee A and B say no, then ask Employee or Supervisor C (YOur teacher).  

If there is any disagreement between A, B, or C, manipulate the situation to your advantage:


"But, Dad, the teacher says its necessary".  or, in VA speak, "Your supervisor said...."

Of course, the reverse also works, "Teacher, my mother prohibits this.  Do you want to my Mom to call the principal?"  

Teenagers have been using this method for hundreds of years to get into trouble.  It works.  Look how many teenagers have succeeded in getting into trouble.  I was one of them.

CAUTION:   Don't Lie, but manipulate instead.  "Gee, Dad, its not my fault the teacher said, "quote what teacher said".    VA speak:  "Gee, Your boss said ......, do you want me to call him and tell him about your reluctance to do this?"   

Use the bosses name..after you discuss the issue with the boss.  Its also good to use a little Fear, for example:

"Does(Bob johnson, insert Directors name)  know about this?"

  Remember, when ever there is something wrong at VA, it always boils down to "who knew what and when".    When Shinseki got fired, he remarked he trusted what his employees told him to his demise.   You can even quote that to the supervisor, but look up Shinseki's exact words.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use