Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bilateral Tinnitus

Rate this question


praned1983

Question

Has any body ever got a bilateral factor for 10% tinnitus. I just got my hearing test done and I look on myhealth.va.gov and notice he add in the report that I had bilateral tinnitus from years of ringing in the ears. I been back from Afghanistan 4 years now and I was thinking the ringing was normal but an veteran friend of mine told me about it so now I could possible be rated at a minimal of 80%. I wish I knew about this 4 years ago. Any body got any ideas.

 

So know my disabilities look like this current

Total Combined Disability

You have a 70% final degree of disability. This percentage determines the amount of benefit pay you will receive.

Rated Disabilities

Table of Rated Disabilities
Disability Rating Decision Related To Effective Date
mechanical low back pain (claimed as mechanical lower back pain) 0% Service Connected   11/14/2011
pes planus, right foot 0% Service Connected   11/14/2011
gastroesophageal reflux disease (claimed as esophageal reflux) 10% Service Connected   11/14/2011
deviated nasal septum (traumatic) (claimed as deviated nasal septum {acquired}) 0% Service Connected   11/14/2011
anxiety disorder Not Otherwise Specified (sub-syndromal PTSD) (claimed as PTSD) 30% Service Connected   11/14/2011
obstructive sleep apnea (claimed as sleep apnea) 50% Service Connected   11/14/2011
pes planus, left foot 0% Service Connected   11/14/2011
bronchitis   Not Service Connected    

tonsillar hypertrophy (claimed as chronic tonsillitis)  

 

Service Connected

 

 

 

06/08/2015

And these are my pending Disabilities

Pending Disabilities

Table of Pending Disabilities
Disability Submitted Type Actions
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 04/04/2016 SEC  
Ear Infection 04/04/2016 SEC  
Foot Condition Left 04/04/2016 NEW  
Migraine (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 04/04/2016 NEW  
Vitamin Deficiency 04/04/2016 NEW  
Allergies 04/04/2016 NEW  
Asthma 04/04/2016 NEW  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 04/04/2016 NEW  
Sacrilliac Injury Or Weekness 03/25/2016 SEC  
Lumbosacral Strain 03/25/2016 SEC  
Sarcoma 03/25/2016 SEC  
Sarcoma Soft-tissue 03/25/2016 SEC  
Sciatic Nerve Paralysis 03/25/2016 SEC  
Mechanical Low Back Pain (claimed As Mechanical Lower Back Pain) 03/25/2016 INC  
Laryngitis 03/25/2016 SEC  
Deviated Nasal Septum (traumatic) (claimed As Deviated Nasal Septum {acquired}) 03/25/2016 INC  
Flatfoot Bilateral (acquired) 03/25/2016 SEC  
Pes Planus Left Foot 03/25/2016 INC  
Schizophrenia 03/25/2016 SEC  
Anxiety Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (sub-syndromal Ptsd) (claimed As Ptsd) 03/25/2016 INC  
Flatfoot Bilateral (acquired) 03/25/2016 SEC  
Pes Planus Right Foot 03/25/2016 INC  
Chronic Laryngitis 03/25/2016 SEC  
Esophageal Condition (stricture Spasm Deverticulum) 03/25/2016 SEC  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (claimed As Esophageal Reflux) 03/25/2016 INC  
Chronic Laryngitis 03/25/2016 SEC  
Tonsillar Hypertrophy (claimed As Chronic Tonsillitis) 03/25/2016 INC  
Chronic Adjustment Disorder (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Major Depression (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Unspecified Depression Disorder (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Other Specified Somatic Symptoms (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Gulf War Veteran With Diagnosed Illness As Qualifying Chronic Disability (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Illness Anxiety Disorder (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Obsessive Complusive Disorder (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/25/2016 NEW  
Anemia Primary 03/25/2016 NEW  
Somatoform Pain Disorder 03/23/2016 SEC  
Somatic Symptom Disorder 03/23/2016 SEC  
Sinusitis 03/23/2016 SEC  
Insomnia 03/23/2016 SEC  
Headaches 03/23/2016 SEC  
Insomnia 03/23/2016 SEC  
Headaches 03/23/2016 SEC  
Insomnia 03/23/2016 SEC  
Tinnitus (related To: Ptsd - Combat) 03/23/2016 NEW  
Unemployability 03/23/2016 NEW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I believe tinnitus is a single 10% rating and as such the bilateral factor does not apply?

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well that sucks if it did that would get me 76% disabilities if it single that is 72% but I got like 32 pending issues I gave the va to look at that I can possibly get about 12 of them to be SC or secondary to my Sleep Apnea, PTSD, Flat Feet, or GERDs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Green is correct. Tinnitus is a single 10% non-bilateral rating.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div5;node=38:1.0.1.1.5#se38.1.4_187

Quote
6260   Tinnitus, recurrent 10
Note (1): A separate evaluation for tinnitus may be combined with an evaluation under diagnostic codes 6100, 6200, 6204, or other diagnostic code, except when tinnitus supports an evaluation under one of those diagnostic codes.  
Note (2): Assign only a single evaluation for recurrent tinnitus, whether the sound is perceived in one ear, both ears, or in the head.  
Note (3): Do not evaluate objective tinnitus (in which the sound is audible to other people and has a definable cause that may or may not be pathologic) under this diagnostic code, but evaluate it as part of any underlying condition causing it.
 

There are other ear-related disabilities, like Meniere's syndrome, which may also involve tinnitus and result in higher ratings.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Yep, good ol' Fort Living room. That takes me back to my basic training days. Someone does something stupid and the drill sgt's would yell, "Where do you think you are? Fort Living Room?"

I'm in the Birmingham area. I don't make it to Huntsville as often as I would like. They do have a decent commissary on Redstone Arsenal.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use