Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Metabolic Syndrome & Diabetes.

Rate this question


syne7

Question

Has anyone had luck establishing diabetes with metabolic syndrome?

I found a blood test / exam in my SMR that had 4 of the 5 criteria for metabolic syndrome:

Waist greater than 40"
Low HDL
High Triglycerides
High BP

Would that be a good wedge to service connect diabetes?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

It's been a few years since I got into this! DMII is/was considered by many to be a metabolic disorder. But, the VA does not want to exactly say this, since it opens up another big can of worms! When I was first diagnosed with DMII, it was obvious that I had some symptoms of it for years, and that they were below the levels recognized as confirming a DMII diagnosis. I ended up seeing an endocrinologist several times, and having some less common diagnostic tests done. At the time, typical medical insurance would not cover the test costs. The VA would not even consider doing them. Unless there is a "head stuck in sand" position, it's reasonable that there is at least an association between several service connectable conditions, metabolic disorders, and the endocrine system.  In a way, due to the compensation side, the VA sort of concentrates on the effects rather than the root causes.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I used evidence of that syndrome in my AO DMII death claim.

My husband had never been diagnosed or treated for DMII.

But I also had considerable more evidence then just the syndrome values that appeared on his Blood chem records.

Glucose readings from your records are the first main marker of diabetes.

And the best glucose readings come from HB1AC tests.

Somewhere here at hadit is how I helped a vet who had been denied for years (CAVC twice) prove he had inservice diabetes.

However in both cases above, mine and his, it was our IMOs that garnered the award.

Diabetes has many symptoms. I used the VA's own diabetes training letter ( searchable here at hadit) as a template for my claim and for the local vet's claim.

Also the fact that the DMII criteria had been lowered years ago is something the VA tried to use against the claim.

It was a considerable amount of work I did in both above cases, to even have enough evidence to make sure any IMOs would be solid.

Research is everything on claims like this, and a full understanding of every medical entry, blood chem report, med acronyms,  etc etc etc in the SMRs as well as the current VA /private medical records.

My DMII claim took 6 years to award and I gathered evidence their entire 6 years, even after obtaining 3 IMOs.

Because I overlooked one of the many autopsy slides, thinking I understood the description of a heart slide, I missed a very probative piece of evidence that could have saved me lots of research and time. My IM0s didn't consider that slide either.

Unfortunately the claim was to prove that my husband's death was contributed to by untreated, undiagnosed diabetes, due to his AO exposure in Vietnam.

It was not a Sec 1151 claim. But it was the most important award I ever received.

I studied Endocrinology for 6 years.  You will need far more evidence than the metabolic syndrome entries, which might or might not be diabetes, although they can be considered as a pre diabetic condition leading to full blown diabetes.

They are important blood values, but only a part of the puzzle.

The VA Training letter here might help you go over your SMRs in a new way. I used my husband's driver's license and even his VA  dental records, and also his VA employee records, among considerable other evidence to prove my case.

I think my research kept the IMO price down. I sent a cover letter referencing the tabbed medical records and entries that revealed much of the medical evidence..but as I said no diagnosis or treatment for DMII

It only took a few days for my IMO doc to prepare the IMO.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use