Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

VA Document Shredding...Again

Rate this question


Meddac

Question

Not sure if this has been posted or not, but I just got done reporting it as a new flash on my podcast. VBA has been caught again. Will it take some of the limelight off of VHA? Just an fyi for everybody.

BTW, VBA training is poor in my experience while working there.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/04/16/ig-report-va-has-been-shredding-documents.html

GEEZ.!.!.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I have been complaining since 2008, the LAST time VA was caught shredding evidnece en masse.  

Then VASEC Dr. Peake published a memo, and VA said they "put controls in place" so it would not happen again.  

The "controls" put in place were ineffective, or not implemented at all.  

Personally, per Dr. Peake's memo in 2008, I submitted a "Special Handling REquest due to document mishandling" in Dec. 2008.   I sent this certified mail return receipt requested.  

VA got the request, and there is an internal memo where a VA employee said, "He did not think this was a shredding case, because the shredding occurred OUTSIDE the 18 month period identified in the memo by Dr. Peake".  

In other words, the VA shredded my documents but that was before and after the 18 month period from 2007 to 2008, where the VA arbitrarily decided that the Veteran could resubmit documents in that period of time, and the Veteran would be taken at his word that is when he submitted them.  

Interestingly, the Special Handling request I submitted in 2008 was NOT in my 2012 RBA even tho there were internal documents in the RBA which referenced my 2008 Special Handling request.  

Bottom line is that shredding continues, unabated, and Veterans can not do anything about it.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It appears that it is continuing to some extent, but most all of VA is going digital which is concerning for many different reasons.

Bottom line is that everyone needs to be very aware. That fact cannot be understated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

broncovet

If you have these copy of these denouements & receipt of your green card when you sent them and some one from VA sign for them back then....send that in as your evidence and ask if they were not shredded  then where are they?

''Interestingly, the Special Handling request I submitted in 2008 was NOT in my 2012 RBA even tho there were internal documents in the RBA which referenced my 2008 Special Handling request.''  

jmo

................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If the VA has no proof of shredding your Documents and can't prove it and you can with copy's and your return receipt they signed for them back then...then the VA has to presume that you sent them in and give you the benefit of doubt.

jmo

........Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

or how can the VA say they don't have something  when the veteran has his own copys of things the VA sent to the Veteran them self?

I keep every copy the VA ever sent me  and in a copy from them its coming from their own typed wording.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

With this continued pattern of behavior, I guess "constructive receipt" has gone out the window

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use