Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

This sums up some of it for VA and VHA

Rate this question


Meddac

Question

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/04/17/newt-gingrich-veterans-administration-grievously-sick/

I'm not real in-tune with the VHA side of things, but I do know that it is severely broken. On the VBA side of the house I agree that the Appeals backlog is huge as reported in the story. If VA shifts resources to address it then the claims backlog will once again skyrocket. The see-saw of priorities goes on and the taxpayers are funding it.

In the VA they literally refer to all of this type of news as "job security", and it really is just that. The Union protects employees, but too often it's the wrong employees. The internal process is so far gone that I don't think it can ever recover. Not even a complete sweep of management will solve the VA's problems because it goes much higher and lower than that.

I could spend all day on this forum trying to educate, inform, and expose.....but I don't want to be on some TV show with my wife telling the world how I failed to get stuff done around the house!! :wacko:

 

Edited by Meddac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The VHA is full of problems, as well as the VBA side of things....I could write a book about that...oh I forgot I promised my daughter I would...

she wants to know the real story of dad's death and my FTCA case because she was in the military when VA settled all that.

I wonder if the title should be "Death By VA"

I got an email today (probably from Ben Krauses site,) that said the VA cops are monitoring a Facebook site to see if it appears the vets there are going to plan some sort of protest.

Years ago the IG monitored hadit and any other vets site to see if we were telling vets how to scam the VA. Of course they found nothing of the kind here...we should in fact be a training program, for the VAROs.

Heck I bet every vet and their survivors wants to protest against the VA sometimes but one of our oldest members here ( Pete S from Texas, always said 'getting vets to join together to do anything is like herding a bunch of cats. ' That is often so true yet 77,000 apparently have signed a Blue Water Navy petition.( Blue Water vets who claim they were exposed to AO during the Vietnam War and whose ships are not on the AO Ships list yet. or wont be put on it aka Danang Harbor vets)

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I am so pissed off at this system.  I have a vet who filed an appeal and after about a year we are waiting for a hearing and he dies.  So all the work the VA did in preparation for this hearing goes out the window because his wife files as a sustaitute so now we have to start all over again.  Also the vet was S/C so the wife was listed as a dependant.  Now because of the substitute, they want her to file a 686 showing her being a dependant.  What a crock.  Where does this end? 

bobbyq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Here is the link to Ben's news on the VA cops and Facebook thing.

http://www.disabledveterans.org/2016/04/18/dhs-va-police-monitoring-va-is-lying-facebook-group/

Bobbyq- don't get discouraged.....years ago my husband died with his 1151 in process. He asked me hours before he suddenly died to continue that claim if they killed him.

I had to start from  day one on the 1151 and his PTSD claim for higher rating.

This should not be an issue in this survivor's case. Because of the substitution regulations.

They will need a lot more than the 686.

Is this for DIC?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I appreciate Newt sticking up for Vets..but he has no solutions, just problems.   The problems are so big, and so widespread, it probably will take legislation to fix it.  I think at the root of it is the unions, which sues VA whenever someone gets fired, so it makes it so difficult to fire people they just keep moving them from place to place to place.  

It reminds me of the old Catholic Church.  When a priest was suspected of molesting, they moved him to another area.  Very, very bad idea, and when it caught up with the Catholic Church it was very very bad.  

Its the same thing with VA.   You dont want  to relocate your problems you want to fix them.  The union largely prevents that.  

Im a pro union guy...voted for the union in my company, tho it was defeated.  The VA needs to be able to trim dead wood, especially when its wormy dead wood infecting the whole forest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hey Berta, thanks.  Short story is we are claiming he got Hep C from air guns, the ship was quarantined for Hep C, later down the road his SMR shows Hep C and the VA says it is not s/c.  Led to cirrhosis of the liver, and finally hepatocellular carcinoma cancer and killed him.  He had his wife on the 40% SC claim and then now that we are doing the appeal they want a 686, and they already know he was married and had a dependant so why the 686 now?  On top of all this their daughter was murdered in January, so the widow has her hands full.  The VA still has not paid death benefits from Sept of last year.  He was being treated at the VA hospital but in the denial the VA basically said THEIR doctor was better than his private doctor. He did NOT have a private doctor.  Any ways...........just PO'd

bobbyq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use