Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Do you see a CUE in this C&P Exam?

Rate this question


syne7

Question

Here is my C&P Exam from 1998.  Do you see a CUE?

C&P Examination 1/20/98

 

PLACE MEDICAL OF EXAM: HISTORY: New  Orleans V.A.M.C.

 

 

 

The patient is a 27-year-old white male who was in the Army from 1990 to 1997.  The patient had two problems while he served his time in the military.  He had a stress fracture of the distal phalanx of the second and toe and he had a loose tendon of his left ankle.  The patient states that his left toe does not give him and problems.  The patient states basically his left ankle doesn’t give him any problems but he does have pain during physical activity.  The patient states that since his injury to his ankle, he had about 20 or 30 ankle sprains and his last one was about seven months ago.  The patient stated that has sustained these ankle injuries basically during physical activity.  The patient states that otherwise during his daily, non-physical activities, the patient does not have any ankle problems.

 

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:

 

Skin:  No hypo or hyper-pigmentation noted.  Vascular:  No abnormal findings.  Nuerological:  Sensory and motor, no abnormal findings.  Musculoskeletal:  The second left toe the DIPJ full range of motion.  Toe in rectus position.  Ankle dorsiflexion 10 degrees.  No intra-articular swelling.  No ligamentous laxity noted.  No peri-articular swelling of the ankle.  No intr-articular swelling of the ankle.  There is 45 degrees of ankle plantar flexion, 10 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion.  The range of motion without any pain or crepitus.

 

X-RAY:

 

Refer to radiology report.

 

IMPRESSION:

 

1.        Status post stress fracture of second left toe without any problems.

 

2.       Full range of motion of left ankle without any pain, swelling or functional loss.  However, patient had a history of 20-30 ankle sprains during physical activity but not during non-physical activity.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1

I believe there was a clear and unmistakable error (CUE) on my rating decision of 8/05/1998 for the following claim:

 

1.       5271 Chronic Left Ankle Sprain (Claimed as loose tendons, left ankle) )% from 5/11/1998.

The following are the CUEs that occurred during my left ankle evaluation

 

1.       No DeLuca or Fatigability protocols were used during the C&P Exams.

 

2.       The C&P Exam dated 1/17/1998 by Demarco stated ankle dorsiflexion at 10 degrees.  Then follows up to say “full range of motion.”  Normal range of motion dorsiflexion is 20 degrees of dorsiflexion per 38 C.F.R. § 4.71.  Clearly 10 degrees is only 50% of 20 degrees.

 

3.       The rating decision dated 8/5/1998 states, “There was no evidence of limited range of motion in the left ankle to warrant a compensable evaluation.  However, there were multiple pieces of evidence demonstrating a limited range of motion:

 

a.       The C&P exam noted a 50% limitation of dorsiflexion (10 degrees versus 20 degrees).

 

b.       Service medical records dated 11/25/1992 show left dorsiflexion at 0 degrees and plantarflexion at 35 degrees (10 degrees below the 45 degree plantarflexion).

 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The CUE would be found, if there is one, in the RO decision that interpreted this C & P exam.

Chedk the diagnostic code and ratings in existence at time of the 1998

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use