Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dr. Notes - Range of Motion C&P Results explaination

Rate this question


Hobbes

Question

I recently had a C&P exam (5 Apr 16) for increased compensation.  I am currently SC at 50%: 10% patellar Tendonities left knee, 10% limited extension left knee, 10% bursitis - left hip, 10% right knee degenerative joint disease, and 10% bursitis - right hip as of March 2011.  I filed for an increase in 2013 and I was denied, but I disagreed with the results via a NOD given the C&P doctor did not do a range of motion test other than 'eyeballing' it when she contorted my knees in such a way, I left there sucking down motrin for six weeks before I kind of recovered, but still live day to day with chronic knee pain and issues.  Regardless, from my latest C&P,  I read the Dr.'s Notes and I was looking for help interpreting what the numbers mean and speculate approximate C&P increase, if. 

I've read the ROM information from VA and from http://www.militarydisabilitymadeeasy.com/kneeandleg.html.  However, when reading the Dr.'s Notes, the ROM extension values do not line up nicely to the information in these charts.  This is where I need help interpreting the results (Boldface - Yellow guess rating). 

Background:  All extension test were conducted from a seated position with my legs at 90 degrees (sitting on exam table).  I was only able to extend/lift either leg 10 degrees up or to about 80 -75 degrees given 0 degrees is completely horizontal with the floor.  During the exam, I stopped forward motion where the start of pain began (extreme pain)


******Snippet of Dr.'s Notes from C&P

3. Range of motion (ROM) and functional limitation
a. Initial range of motion Right Knee
[ ] All normal
[X] Abnormal or outside of normal range
[ ] Unable to test (please explain)
[ ] Not indicated (please explain)

Flexion (0 to 140): 0 to 140 degrees
Extension (140 to 0): 140 to 130 degrees  (Diagnostic code 5261? Guessing 50% rating????)


If abnormal, does the range of motion itself contribute to functional loss? [ ] Yes (please explain) [X] No
Description of pain (select best response): Pain noted on exam but does not result in/cause functional loss
If noted on exam, which ROM exhibited pain (select all that apply)?
Extension Is there evidence of pain with weight bearing? [ ] Yes [X] No
Is there objective evidence of localized tenderness or pain on palpation of the joint or associated soft tissue? [X] Yes [ ] No

If yes, describe including location, severity and relationship to condition(s): entire right knee joint, moderate, unclear

Is there objective evidence of crepitus? [ ] Yes [X] No

Left Knee
[ ] All normal
[X] Abnormal or outside of normal range
[ ] Unable to test (please explain)
[ ] Not indicated (please explain)

Flexion (0 to 140): 0 to 140 degrees
Extension (140 to 0): 140 to 120 degrees (Diagnostic code 5261? Guessing 50% rating????)


If abnormal, does the range of motion itself contribute to functional loss? [ ] Yes (please explain) [X] No
Description of pain (select best response): Pain noted on exam but does not result in/cause functional loss

If noted on exam, which ROM exhibited pain (select all that apply)?
Extension Is there evidence of pain with weight bearing? [ ] Yes [X] No
Is there objective evidence of localized tenderness or pain on palpation of the joint or associated soft tissue? [X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, describe including location, severity and relationship to condition(s): entire right knee joint, moderate, unclear

Is there objective evidence of crepitus? [ ] Yes [X] No

b. Observed repetitive use Right Knee Is the Veteran able to perform repetitive use testing with at least three repetitions? [X] Yes [ ] No
Is there additional functional loss or range of motion after three repetitions? [X] Yes [ ] No

Select all factors that cause this functional loss: Pain, Weakness ROM after three repetitions:
Flexion (0 to 140): 0 to 130 degrees
Extension (140 to 0): 140 to 120 degrees


Left Knee Is the Veteran able to perform repetitive use testing with at least three repetitions? [X] Yes [ ] No
Is there additional functional loss or range of motion after three repetitions? [X] Yes [ ] No

Select all factors that cause this functional loss: Pain, Weakness ROM after three repetitions:
Flexion (0 to 140): 0 to 140 degrees
Extension (140 to 0): 140 to 110 degrees


c. Repeated use over time Right Knee Is the Veteran being examined immediately after repetitive use over time? [X] Yes [ ] No
Does pain, weakness, fatigability or incoordination significantly limit functional ability with repeated use over a period of time? [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Unable to say w/o mere speculation

Select all factors that cause this functional loss: Pain, Weakness Able to describe in terms of range of motion: [X] Yes [ ] No
Flexion (0 to 140): 0 to 140 degrees
Extension (140 to 0): 140 to 120 degrees


Left Knee Is the Veteran being examined immediately after repetitive use over time? [X] Yes [ ] No
Does pain, weakness, fatigability or incoordination significantly limit functional ability with repeated use over a period of time? [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Unable to say w/o mere speculation

Select all factors that cause this functional loss: Pain, Weakness

Able to describe in terms of range of motion: [X] Yes [ ] No
Flexion (0 to 140): 0 to 140 degrees
Extension (140 to 0): 140 to 110 degrees


d. Flare-ups No response provided

e. Additional factors contributing to disability Right Knee
In addition to those addressed above, are there additional contributing factors of disability?
Please select all that apply and describe: None
Left Knee In addition to those addressed above, are there additional contributing factors of disability?

Please select all that apply and describe:  None 4.
Muscle strength testing
a. Muscle strength - Rate strength according to the following scale: 0/5 No muscle movement 1/5 Palpable or visible muscle contraction, but no joint movement 2/5 Active movement with gravity eliminated 3/5 Active movement against gravity 4/5 Active movement against some resistance 5/5 Normal strength

Right Knee:
Rate Strength:
Flexion: 5/5 Extension: 4/5
Is there a reduction in muscle strength? [X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, is the reduction entirely due to the claimed condition in the Diagnosis Section? [X] Yes [ ] No


Left Knee:
Rate Strength: Flexion: 5/5 Extension: 3/5
Is there a reduction in muscle strength? [X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, is the reduction entirely due to the claimed condition in the Diagnosis Section? [X] Yes [ ] No


Thanks! I appreciate translating the ROM values with VA Disability tables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use