Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Army/ VA surgery

Rate this question


praned1983

Question

Does anyone know if you can put in a claim for when you have surgery. The reason I ask I am schedule to have back surgery next month with the VA. I am scared shitless. But I want to know if you can put a claim for 2 surgeries or scars. My first surgery was when I was in the Army 10 years ago I had all 4 of my wisdom teeth taken out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

If you are SC for your back, then go ahead and get look at filing for convalescence:
http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/claims-special-convalescence.asp

 

Like you, the Army also removed all four of my wisdom teeth when I was on active duty ages ago. The act of having all four wisdom teeth removed -- by itself -- does not qualify for a compensable rating, but pain and problems kept me going. When I originally filed, they denied me and gave that reason. I appealed and then they came back and denied again saying the surgery was elective. I appealed again and the BVA sent me for a C&P exam. Of course, the x-ray showed nothing, but I did have limited ROM and pain. I was sent for an arthrogram and that proved that the surgery was bungled. They granted SC because the oral surgeon said that the cause was the surgery and the effect was limited ROM and pain. Initially, I was granted 10%, then later I filed for increases to 20% and 30%.

 

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div5;node=38:1.0.1.1.5#se38.1.4_1150

9905   Temporomandibular articulation, limited motion of:  
Inter-incisal range:  
0 to 10 mm 40
11 to 20 mm 30
21 to 30 mm 20
31 to 40 mm 10
Range of lateral excursion:  
0 to 4 mm 10
Note—Ratings for limited inter-incisal movement shall not be combined with ratings for limited lateral excursion  

 

Keep in mind  that inter-incisal range is vertical opening/closing and lateral excursion is horizontal left/right movement. Even if you get SC for both axis', you will only get the a single rating under 9905, which would be the higher of the two.

If you have other problems related to this, like headaches, you can file secondary for those.

 

Regarding scars from the surgery, I know I have some decent ones inside my mouth, but never considered filing for them. Not sure if it is possible, but might be worth a shot. I know mine get tight and ache periodically.

I hope this helps!

Edited by Vync

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Surgical scars are compensable. But, there as always, are some gory details.

Are the scars painful ?

Are they superficial or deep ? The VA likes to say that all the scars are superficial, even if the underlying surgery went through multiple layers of flesh, tissue, muscle, and bone.

(I.E. CABG) 

There can be a length requirement, as well as a disfiguring factor.

 

When I hit the VA with an NOD/appeal, they reversed course. The old/new law bit applied. But, they rated all scars at 0%, and then surgical scars as a compensable %.

????

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

That just does not seem to make much sense, but then again, we're talking about the VA...

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use