Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Compensation claim

Rate this question


Michael Enriquez

Question

Here's one I could really use some help on. I started a claim for a variety of symptoms ( about 8) in January 2014. I realize now that it was a big mistake to do that. My claim is now in the gathering of evidence phase with a projected date to completion of 8/2016 - 1/2017. Prior to that it was in the pending decision approval for 3 months 12/2015- 3/2016 where it went to preparation for decision where it stood for a month and a half to get to the point that I am at now. I've checked with the 1-800 number and get the standard response about workload and backlog. I've asked to have my claim decided with the information available, tried to get it expedited due to hardship and these haven't worked. My case is being handled by the Denver Regional. Update or maybe could be additional information. During the time I have been waiting, I have been granted Social Security Disability. One of my claims is for IU. I sent that information to the VA. Will this help on my claim and by doing this will my claim be delayed even longer?

Edited by Michael Enriquez
add new information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I don't feel ebenefits dates are always reliable.

If you have given VA the evidence they requested on the 5103 letter, there isn't much you can do at this point in my opinion, but to wait.

Do you have a vet rep? Was this a TDIU claim? You filed in Jan 2014. With the backlog it is not unusual to still be waiting in 2016 for a decision.

One of my claims took from 2003 to 2012, and was set for BVA transfer but I got it resolved favorably when it was sent to the Nehmer division ( AO claims) 9 years

It still stuns me how long that took and addition claims I filed in 2004 were with it. Also awarded in 2012. 8 years

My evidence was impeccable.

Another claim I had was filed in 2003 and awarded in 2009 from a BVA decision and then I had to fight for them to pay me the retro (it was a refund technically) 6 years, almost 7 until refund came.

My evidence for that one too, was impeccable.

I am the survivor of a deceased veteran and not a veteran myself but during the whole time I waited for those above claims to be properly resolved I continued to seek evidence, even though I felt I had already sent them enough.

Waiting is miserable. I remember ,on the day my husband died, (he had been told to call the RO in Oct, as  they would have a decision by then, and he called only to find they had not moved on the claim at all in many months) he was upset and said to me he almost wished they would deny it, so that he would not be waiting anymore..... as it was, those claims took about 3 years more  to resolve and he never saw the award letters because he was dead. At least he wasn't waiting anymore.

They could have resolved both claims in his lifetime.

I am sorry you are waiting so long and many others here are waiting too long too.

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Actually having more items in your claim can be an advantage. The workers in the regional office are under time constraints to get work done. You are more likely to get partial approval and deferred items so they can close out temporarily the claim. I had 35 items one time. They called me and asked how we could close some of the claims. All were valid claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Sounds like your case may have been involved in what the VA refers to as "Challenge". This is where VA "trains" new VSRs or Raters, and it generally takes anywhere from 2-4 months depending on whatever VA Central Office guidelines are right now. That usually explains a lot of the bouncing status updates. I know for a fact the training is being conducted right now (and has been for a while) for VSRs and Raters.

It could also be that your case was being handled by a new employee (already trained) at the Regional Office. They do their work which changes the status, and then their work gets checked by a mentor who likely annotates errors and send he case back which changes the status again....

Now, I have heard from a LOT of Veterans the line of: "Well, why is my case with someone that's new and doesn't know anything?" They are understandably upset about this, but all I can say to that is that this is how VA trains their new employees. Yes, they work "Live" cases, and yes it takes longer. It's something that I've opposed for a long time, but it's not going to change anytime soon.

And I agree with waccamawwild that VA employees are under time constraints (VA calls it "suspense") to get work done. However, those time constraints don't mean much at all to VA employees, and claims are often outside of or past the suspense dates that have been set.

I also want to add that if you do have a lot of issues as waccamawwild points out, then you are only somewhat likely to get a partial decision and deferred elements. When the VA defers issues it does not temporarily close out the claim. It closes the issues that were decided, but the claim stays open and pending for the issues that were deferred.

VA attempts now to not defer anything because overall claim timeliness is so important to Congress. They do still defer things, but it has scaled back a lot. They also make deals like the one that waccamawwild sites in the post. Be careful of this though because there are a lot (a whole lot) of VSRs AND Raters out there who are only looking to scale back their pending workload. The deal is not always the most favorable for the Veteran.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use