Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

after winning tort

Rate this question


3wood

Question

I settled my tort for delay of cancer diagnosis for 35k.  My question is can I now go after the va healthcare system for a monthly disability. The VA regional office  attorney ordered her on outside medical opinion that found the VA was in fact at fault hence the settlement. I tried the online disability route but it was denied because it wasn't service related.  Any guidance or info much appreciated. trying to avoid a attorney but my be my only course of action at this point.  thanks,  Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

GOOD FOR YOU!

You can file for Section 1151 benefits.

We have a lot of info here on that in the 1151 FTCA forum.

They will deduct the offset from any comp they give you, until it is recovered.

Did you deal with the FTCA without a lawyer? I did and was able to negotiate an offset that was very favorable.

Then years later I proved the malpracticed  conditions were also due directly to Agent Orange. They had to refund the offset they deducted from me.

The amount of the offset appears in the settlement papers you received.

Unlike FTCA there is no deadline on 1151 claims. They will want the offset negotiated amount back, however.

 

.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What I mean is of course they found me eligible for DIC ,under 1151 so they deducted the offset from that.

Then I received 2 awards under AO DIC. After the first AO SC death award they paid me back the offset. They didn't want to but I knew the regs and got some GC honcho to call them and demand they pay it. They did.

But there are other factors here to consider and we don't have all the skinny to really opine on the 1151 issue..........

I am a widow of a vet -death by VA.and AO.  I suggest you carefully read the FTCA info here as to offsets, as that might depend on when the 1151 claim was filed. I filed both FTCA and 1151 at the same time.

A few months ago I won another 1151 claim , over 20 years after the veteran died.

As the Radio show link that was posted here today with Dr. Bash indicates, malpractice does not happen over night and the consequences can grow.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I double checked...yes there will still be an offset.

This recent BVA decision has those regulations and the OGC Pres Op that explains it.

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp14/Files7/1456651.txt

I hope you do not go through the Bull Crap this FTCA vet went through...They pulled this crap on me too.

Funny how stuff either disappears or is never properly associated with 1151 claims....sometimes so we must keep on our toes with them.

The recent 1151 I won had a 2 page medical opinion from their own chief cardio doc in DC.

They absolutely ignored it, and I think the guy who fills their paper cup dispenser at their water cooler prepared the "medical review" to deny it. I raised hell and CUED them within days of getting the denial.

Of course they awarded the claim then, very fast, and referred to the Strategic Health Team VACO Cardio report.

(The same report that helped with my FTCA wrongful death claim.)

This crap  is not incompetenece...it is deliberate.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you Berta!  You gave me so much I'm going to give myself a day or two to read where you've pointed me. After I get my bearings,may I ask for more directions. It's like being in a maze but trying to figure out where the exit is when you're not in tip top mental or physical capacity to begin with...lol.   Thanks again Berta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GREAT!   The General Counsel started low with me too(I asked for millions on the SF95 he he)

But we had a state cap here in my state so I got them up to a little less than that.

They know if we are disabled, or in my case I was a grief stricken widow, that they can try to play games with us.

But I was not only satisfied with the settlement I got ,  I liked dealing with the General Counsel and Regional Counsel attorneys a lot.

They knew I had the goods on them and we had brief and friendly conversations that were about other nuances of 38 USC etc etc and other claims issues,too. They are brilliant lawyers. They said I was too tough. You bet I was.

But the best thing I did (because my daughter, a veteran USAF 7 Years) got me to re-open years later for DMII due to AO.

I didn't see any DMII basis and sure didn't want to have another VA claim, but she reminded me that it was ''as likely as not" they might have missed diabetes as a diagnosis and obviously no treatment ,since they already had malpracticed so much.

I studied his med recs, autopsy etc etc again and then I studied Endocrinology.

She was right.They couldn't even rate it at all...I still wonder about that....but that awarded a direct DIC SC death, REPS benefits, Chapter 35 extension, FTCA refund, maybe some other stuff too...and best of all I could accept a service connected death.

There was no Peace with Honor for my husband in a Section 1151/FTCA wrongful death.

On a personal note here, my recent PCP annual exam Monday found my cholesterol was great and my Tryglycerides were 84, reduced from 93 last year. I have no heart disease and I think it is because I eat right and exercise.

I recall my husband's Tryglycerides were way over 200 and his HDL/LDL etc was bad too.I used those VA Blood chem reports to prove he had diabetes mellitus along with other extensive medical evidence.

I learned from studying those blood chem reports that diabetes can become a trilogy of these 3 readings and can certainly lead to heart disease (diabetic cardiomyopathy) or make AO IHD get worse.

The VA docs had put little check marks on some of his high readings in the med recs and never did a single thing to look into why the readings were so high.

I dont advise anyone to do FTCA by themselves unless they are willing to read, research, spend the time it takes, and practically become a doctor. But you and I and a few others here over the years have succeeded because we were willing to go the whole 9 yards....and we had the EVIDENCE. I commend you!

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use