Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appealing Retro Pay Percentage

Rate this question


Jimmer

Question

Hi Everyone, thanks for all the get info that you have provided, it has helped me, to really begin to understand the nonsense that the VA pulls on us veterans.  I have a question, and your help would be greatly appreciated.  I had filed in 2007 for SC disability on my left eye.  The VA fought this repeatedly, saying I had poor eyesight prior to joining the military (not true) to just flat out denying with vague answers(Doesn't meet the criteria for SC disability).  In October 2013 I had a BVA hearing, in which they agreed my eye problem was service connected.    I was awarded a 10% disability, which I immediately appealed.  In February  2015 I had a eye exam at the VA, and they raised the disability to 60%.  Then later in 2015 they "CUED" themselves and raised the rating to 80%.  I had felt the VA purposely "low balled" my initial award because it went back to February 2007, of seven years.  This is the kicker"  I just found the letter that I had provided to the VA from five different board certified ophthalmologists  that stated my exact vision of both my left and right eye.  Looking at the code of ratings  (CFR 4.79) my rating fell between 50% to 60%.  In other words, the VA had this information, prior to assigning me the rating, and they deliberately ignored it to come up with their measly 10%.  I felt this was done purposely to avoid paying a higher rating covering seven years.  What would be my best way to proceed?  Hire a lawyer,  File a CUE?  As I said, they had this information, (even mentioned it in one of their denial letters)  but choose to ignore it.    Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

This happens a lot.  The VA's favorites, are in this order:

1.  Delay, hopefully until you die. 

2. Deny when they can, award only if they must.  

3.   Lowball whenever possible, 0 percent is their all time favorite lowball.  

4.  Hornswaggle you on effective date, after they have tried numbers 1 through 3, above, repeatedly.    

     I do think its a good idea to run this by an attorney.  You are disputing both effective dates, and disability percentages.  Its very tough to "cue" a disability percentage because the criteria usually leaves doors open to interpretation, and interpretion disputes are not CUE.  

    All this said, its a Colvin violation for the board to fail to give a reasons and bases as to why they did not consider a specific, favorable, medical exam without a reasons and bases.  

    In other words, the BOard can reject these five favorable medicl exams, but they must give a reason why they did so.  You know, for example the examiner, was not board certifed in opthamalogy, while the C and P examiner was.  They can reject your evidence, but they need to say why.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Quote

 

Thanks for the advice Broncovet, I will contact an attorney.  The VA had the letters from the five different "board certified" ophthalmologists, and each one had a vision that fell into the 50%-60% disability range.  When I had a VA eye exam in February 2015, he came up with a 60%.   I never received a letter or reason for the VA coming up with 10%.  I fell they were just "pissed off", because I took it all the way to a BVA hearing, and they ruled in my favor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Depending on when you received your rating in 2015, instead of filing a CUE claim, if it has not been a full year file a NOD ASAP. Veterans gets CUE on the brain and think that is the best way to go but IMHO a CUE claim should be a veterans last choice and beyond the one year to file a NOD. By filing a NOD it will result in the same retro payment as a CUE claim and you do not have to give up the benefit of doubt. Filing a NOD claim is a lot easier to win than a CUE claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If you have not filed your NOD and you go beyond the one year for it, it really doesn't matter what kind of evidence you have, when you file your CUE VA will deny your CUE.  VA will come up with something to the effect that your Cue claim does not rise to the level of CUE and you get no retro pay.

P.S. I thought this was familiar, so it has been 30 days or so, I hope you filed that NOD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Quote

 

Broncovet,  The eye doctors actually came up with a  vision 20/400 left eye, 20/200 right eye, I was able to determine the percentage disability from the schedule of ratings for the eye.  It was right at 60% disability.    Pete992,   I did file the NOD, within the year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use