Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

SMC J; SMC S, What to file for?

Rate this question


THOMAS89031

Question

Scenario:   VA awarded veteran a 100% PT IHD Agent Orange Claim (Nehmer) filed back in 2010.   But neglected to award SMC.

When you file, should  you request SMC J or SMC S?  (SMC (j) is 2673mo; SMC  (s) is 2993 mo.)

Do you mention Bradley vs Peake  or Nehmer provisions?

 Do you indicate its being filed as a CUE or just say:________etc,etc.......

Any other opinions?   Thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I was awarded 100% TDUI P&T no future exams and disability as of chronic  in nature back in 2002 and they never mention SMC.

 a veteran has to meet the criteria for the SMC   and need to meet the % rating of 160% over the 100% the VA has  a special rate table to rate SMC's when a veteran qualify 

if you have a CUE you need  to file the correct form   21-4107 or 4597

I believe? but not sure on these form #???

you may want to read  Regulation 38 1404 part 20

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
55 minutes ago, Buck52 said:

I was awarded 100% TDUI P&T no future exams and disability as of chronic  in nature back in 2002 and they never mention SMC.

 a veteran has to meet the criteria for the SMC   and need to meet the % rating of 160% over the 100% the VA has  a special rate table to rate SMC's when a veteran qualify 

if you have a CUE you need  to file the correct form   21-4107 or 4597

I believe? but not sure on these form #???

you may want to read  Regulation 38 1404 part 20

Buck:  In Bradley v Peake  22 Vet.App.280 (2008)  It states "If the disability alone supports TDIU, then the

disability satisfies the requirements of a single SC disability rated 100%"

Could you now file a SMC claim using Bradley v Peake ?.

Thanks for the other suggestions..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I had an SMC CUE awarded under Nehmer but that statement simplifies what I posted on it here in 2012 (available under a search)

If TDIU is granted solely for one disability and any additional disability ( independent of the TDIU one) is rated at least at 60% that qualifies for SMC .

Same as for 100% SC.

My husband was 100% P & T for PTSD , then awarded 100% posthumously for a 1151 stroke.

They (Nehmer) gave him the Housebound award of SMC S but in another part of the very long decision, they also considered the 100% plus 60% regs too.

SMC S pays the same amount regardless of HB or 100 plus 60.

What is SMC J?

The SMC  CUE I won I stated was for "Lack of consideration of the SMC mandate". That was their legal error.

I sent them the Mandate.It was dated years prior  to the decision I cued.

The established medical evidence they had at time of the alleged CUE fully supported the fact that they legally had to consider the SMC mandate.

I had to spell that out to them like they were 10 years old.

Once they properly applied the mandate ,they awarded the CUE claim.They also awarded a IHD CUE claim I had filed and a CUE on the 1151 stroke ratings.

Those claims were less then 2 or 3  paragraphs. CUEs should be keep simple, no rhetoric, just cite the laws they broke and how they broke them, to your detriment ( mean they owed you cash due to their error)with the date of and attach a copy of the decision (and rating sheet)of what you are calling a CUE on. You Must be specific as to the Legal Errors.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta,  "What is SMC J?"   My Bad,  I was reading what I thought pertained to SMC.. 

But to answer your question, the cite I misquoted as thinking it dealt with SMC was actually 38 1110 (j) --

Sorrry.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, Berta said:

I had an SMC CUE awarded under Nehmer but that statement simplifies what I posted on it here in 2012 (available under a search)

If TDIU is granted solely for one disability and any additional disability ( independent of the TDIU one) is rated at least at 60% that qualifies for SMC .

Same as for 100% SC.

My husband was 100% P & T for PTSD , then awarded 100% posthumously for a 1151 stroke.

They (Nehmer) gave him the Housebound award of SMC S but in another part of the very long decision, they also considered the 100% plus 60% regs too.

SMC S pays the same amount regardless of HB or 100 plus 60.

What is SMC J?

The SMC  CUE I won I stated was for "Lack of consideration of the SMC mandate". That was their legal error.

I sent them the Mandate.It was dated years prior  to the decision I cued.

The established medical evidence they had at time of the alleged CUE fully supported the fact that they legally had to consider the SMC mandate.

I had to spell that out to them like they were 10 years old.

Once they properly applied the mandate ,they awarded the CUE claim.They also awarded a IHD CUE claim I had filed and a CUE on the 1151 stroke ratings.

Those claims were less then 2 or 3  paragraphs. CUEs should be keep simple, no rhetoric, just cite the laws they broke and how they broke them, to your detriment ( mean they owed you cash due to their error)with the date of and attach a copy of the decision (and rating sheet)of what you are calling a CUE on. You Must be specific as to the Legal Errors.

 

 

 

 

Berta, What is the amount VA pays for SMC S?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The rates are here under a search and at www.va.gov, the link should be on their main page ,and here at Mil.com:

http://www.military.com/benefits/veterans-health-care/va-disability-compensation-rates.html

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use