Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

denied Sleep Apnea as secondary to PTSD

Rate this question


Jimmer

Question

Hi everyone, I just received the BBE that stated I was denied sleep apnea as a secondary to PTSD.  The denial was not surprising.  The fact they really never looked at my evidence is.   Yes I am going to file a NOD, immediately.  Some of the comments for the reason for denial, would be humorous, if it wasn't downright stupidity.  The VA indicates "on January 15, 2015, you reported to the examiner (NP) that had been diagnosed for sleep apnea, had had used a CPAP devise but were not currently using it. You reported that you planned to have another sleep study to re-evaluate whether or not to return to using it"  Not true, I told the "doctor wanna-be", that the machine was cumbersome, noisy, and difficult to move, and that I used it as much as needed, almost every day.  On August 28, 2015, I had a sleep study done, and my condition had worsen, and that I needed to use the CPAP machine, every night, giving me a small portable Mirage Quattro machine.  I had a DBQ and a letter filled out by a board-certified pulmonologist  who my sleep apnea was stated my sleep apnea  "more likely then not aggravated by my PTSD, and the PTSD was more likely then not  aggravated by my obstructive sleep apnea."   He went into detail explaining  how and why they effected each other.  The VA  stated the doctor "did not state your OSA is caused by your PTSD, however your he noted your OSA is aggravated by your PTSD". "Your private medical sleep study  indicated you need to use a CPAP machine, therefor no evidence shown of aggravation in this case".  Also they stated since I am at 50% PTSD, "adding OSA would be combined into a single rating of 50%."  Here is the kicker:  "to establishservice connection on a secondary basis, the evidence must show chronic disease or injury which resulted from a service-connected disability or was aggravated thereby".  This is what I was trying to do!  I spelled it out to them this was a secondary to PTSD, and the doctor indicated  the OSA was aggravated by the PTSD.  I am going to see the pulmonologist Friday, and have him redo a DBQ and another letter.   I am trying to find a way to reply, with downright biting scarcasm" to the VA.  Part of me wants to just request a BVA hearing and have letters, DBQ from a dozen "board certified pulmonologists" and shove it in the VA face!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

C&P Examiners always takes what the veteran states out of context and puts there on context in his/her report.

example :

During aC&P EXAM for compensation or service connection the  veteran states''I  TRY to get out more but due to my SC disability I can't because of the pain is so server.

Examiner''Veterans states he is getting out more so his disability has shown improvement.''

This is what makes a denial eazy for the raters

and its why we need to take a spouse or friend with us to the C&P Exam   or in some states take a recording devise.

JMO

.............Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Let your medical evidence do the talking for you.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck52,  You are absolutely right.  I will let my medical evidence speak for me, it just I get frustrated with all the b.s., the VA throws are way.  Your example it the nail on the head!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use